ImageImageImage

Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,559
And1: 70,445
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#181 » by Celts17Pride » Thu Jan 30, 2020 2:20 pm

Good Morning! Celtics get Brandon Ingram yet? :lol:
100proof
Starter
Posts: 2,187
And1: 1,117
Joined: Jul 25, 2019

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#182 » by 100proof » Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:00 pm

LewisnotMiller wrote:Sex Pants and a first round pick for Jakob Poeltl?



In a heartbeat.

Doubt spurs do it thiugh
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#183 » by ddb » Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:05 pm

the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry
100proof
Starter
Posts: 2,187
And1: 1,117
Joined: Jul 25, 2019

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#184 » by 100proof » Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:10 pm

ddb wrote:the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry


agree, but still

Hayward, Romeo, Memphis pick
for
Ingram, Favors, Moore.

Nawlins ups the ante with a player of ingrams production in Hayward while adding a young do all wing and a lotto pick
Ball
Jrue
Hayward
Zion
Hayes

Boston shores up center position and adds ingram.
Kemba/Wannamaker
Brown/Smart
Ingram/Moore
Tatum/Theis
Favors/Kanter
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#185 » by ddb » Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:47 pm

100proof wrote:
ddb wrote:the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry


agree, but still

Hayward, Romeo, Memphis pick
for
Ingram, Favors, Moore.

Nawlins ups the ante with a player of ingrams production in Hayward while adding a young do all wing and a lotto pick
Ball
Jrue
Hayward
Zion
Hayes

Boston shores up center position and adds ingram.
Kemba/Wannamaker
Brown/Smart
Ingram/Moore
Tatum/Theis
Favors/Kanter


I'd do that deal all day long. I just don't see why NOLA does
100proof
Starter
Posts: 2,187
And1: 1,117
Joined: Jul 25, 2019

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#186 » by 100proof » Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:52 pm

ddb wrote:
100proof wrote:
ddb wrote:the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry


agree, but still

Hayward, Romeo, Memphis pick
for
Ingram, Favors, Moore.

Nawlins ups the ante with a player of ingrams production in Hayward while adding a young do all wing and a lotto pick
Ball
Jrue
Hayward
Zion
Hayes

Boston shores up center position and adds ingram.
Kemba/Wannamaker
Brown/Smart
Ingram/Moore
Tatum/Theis
Favors/Kanter


I'd do that deal all day long. I just don't see why NOLA does



depends on if they want to make a serious playoff push. Jru and Hayward give them stable support who can produce at a high level. Good clear headed vets to work with all the youth they have. And they add what is essentially 2 lotto picks as well.

I think they consider it long and hard.
malachiii
Ballboy
Posts: 14
And1: 21
Joined: Nov 09, 2019

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#187 » by malachiii » Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:16 pm

100proof wrote:
ddb wrote:the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry


agree, but still

Hayward, Romeo, Memphis pick
for
Ingram, Favors, Moore.

Nawlins ups the ante with a player of ingrams production in Hayward while adding a young do all wing and a lotto pick
Ball
Jrue
Hayward
Zion
Hayes

Boston shores up center position and adds ingram.
Kemba/Wannamaker
Brown/Smart
Ingram/Moore
Tatum/Theis
Favors/Kanter


and we are ko'd in the second round. too many shooters not enough play makers
100proof
Starter
Posts: 2,187
And1: 1,117
Joined: Jul 25, 2019

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#188 » by 100proof » Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:20 pm

malachiii wrote:
100proof wrote:
ddb wrote:the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry


agree, but still

Hayward, Romeo, Memphis pick
for
Ingram, Favors, Moore.

Nawlins ups the ante with a player of ingrams production in Hayward while adding a young do all wing and a lotto pick
Ball
Jrue
Hayward
Zion
Hayes

Boston shores up center position and adds ingram.
Kemba/Wannamaker
Brown/Smart
Ingram/Moore
Tatum/Theis
Favors/Kanter


and we are ko'd in the second round. too many shooters not enough play makers


that is certainly an interesting take
Mr Loggins
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,160
And1: 2,498
Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#189 » by Mr Loggins » Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:49 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Froob wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:I mean, Ingram would be a phenomenal fit between Brown and Tatum, but.. he's going into restricted free agency.. I guess you'd have to offer Langford, probably Grant and/or Rob Williams, Edwards, and 3 or more 1sts.. It's interesting, especially if you could give up Rob and turn around and trade Hayward for Capela or whoever..

I don’t see how that’s close to appealing for Ingram unless they secretly hate him.


Agree, but.. they could have reservations about his health, his fit with Zion, not wanting to give him a max - Brooklyn let DAR go - they might want to sign someone else (Hayward?) over the summer..

If there are any legs to the rumor, if you turned Langford and Rob Willians and picks into Ingram and then traded Hayward for Capela, Drummond or Myles Turner..



it’s just like that craigslist Ted Talk where that guy turned a paperclip eventually into a house
Mr Loggins
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,160
And1: 2,498
Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#190 » by Mr Loggins » Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:53 pm

100proof wrote:
ddb wrote:the Brandon Ingram "rumor" is the most random trade idea of all-time. Why in the world would NOLA ever want to trade Ingram? a 22-year old averaging 25ppg. With Zion/Ingram in place the Pels have a core. The only way this makes sense for NOLA is if they want to acquire someone like KAT via trade and feel like collecting as many picks/assets as possible puts them in the best position to do that.

I call B.S. on this idea. sorry


agree, but still

Hayward, Romeo, Memphis pick
for
Ingram, Favors, Moore.

Nawlins ups the ante with a player of ingrams production in Hayward while adding a young do all wing and a lotto pick
Ball
Jrue
Hayward
Zion
Hayes

Boston shores up center position and adds ingram.
Kemba/Wannamaker
Brown/Smart
Ingram/Moore
Tatum/Theis
Favors/Kanter



seems like each one of the NO assets is worth more than the corresponding Bos assett
User avatar
jeremym480
Senior
Posts: 701
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jul 15, 2016
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
   

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#191 » by jeremym480 » Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:21 pm

I love talking trades as much as the next guy but yall are wasting a lot of energy on the fake Ingram deal.

Ingram should be an All-Star and is a RFA on a team that needs control of players because they aren't a FA destination. New Orleans hasn't been great this year but their injury situation has probably been worse than ours. They have one of the easiest schedules down the stretch and will more than likely be trying for the playoffs instead of tanking. It makes zero sense for them to trade Ingram now.
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,219
And1: 20,593
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#192 » by djFan71 » Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:33 pm

Spoiler:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Opinion piece. The part on Smart isn't based on rumors. But KOC is suggesting smart GMs should try to pry him away from the Cs, but he himself wouldn't do it if he's running the Celtics.

Read on Twitter

I'd love to steal Derrick White. I proposed one a while ago in a late night flurry... Something like Grant/Wanamaker for White/Metu. Maybe add a 2nd or MIL 20. Maybe not since Grant is our 3rd big at this point.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#193 » by ddb » Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:58 pm

djFan71 wrote:
Spoiler:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Opinion piece. The part on Smart isn't based on rumors. But KOC is suggesting smart GMs should try to pry him away from the Cs, but he himself wouldn't do it if he's running the Celtics.

Read on Twitter

I'd love to steal Derrick White. I proposed one a while ago in a late night flurry... Something like Grant/Wanamaker for White/Metu. Maybe add a 2nd or MIL 20. Maybe not since Grant is our 3rd big at this point.


SA will look to find a new home for LMA and DeRozen before dealing White. They like White.
sportfan6197
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 321
Joined: Dec 18, 2015

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#194 » by sportfan6197 » Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:59 pm

^SAS will dump Forbes before White
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#195 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:59 pm

Mr Loggins wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Froob wrote:I don’t see how that’s close to appealing for Ingram unless they secretly hate him.


Agree, but.. they could have reservations about his health, his fit with Zion, not wanting to give him a max - Brooklyn let DAR go - they might want to sign someone else (Hayward?) over the summer..

If there are any legs to the rumor, if you turned Langford and Rob Willians and picks into Ingram and then traded Hayward for Capela, Drummond or Myles Turner..



it’s just like that craigslist Ted Talk where that guy turned a paperclip eventually into a house


That’s a lot of my trade ideas, yeah :D But it happens. Look how Brooklyn got DAR, years ago the Bulls got Luol Deng because the Suns didn’t want their pick.. Cleveland got an unprotected lotto 1st (I think the one that became Kyrie) from the Clippers for taking the last year(?) of Baron Davis’ money.. We gave up an unprotected lotto pick that could have been Shawn Marion to *upgrade Andrew Declerq to Vitaly Potapenko*
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#196 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:00 pm

Lonzo would be a similar interesting target - I’d give up Langford picks etc. for him
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#197 » by sully00 » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:14 pm

NYG wrote:What pick(s) would Boston add to Vincent Poirier and Semi Ojeleye for Montrezl Harrell if the Clippers offered that as part of a bigger deal on their end?

I really like Harrell I would part with the Memphis pick for him and I don't even really care about the two late 1sts at all.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,597
And1: 8,077
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#198 » by Celtics_Champs » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:18 pm

I enjoy reading this thread but can only feel like a wet blanket because I truly believe one to three minor moves will happen in the entire league.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#199 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:20 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:If we traded Smart, I’d think it’d be much more preferable to do it in the offseason than during the season for chemistry reasons.


If it improves the team and gives us a path to contending, pull the trigger on any trade at any time.

This season is meaningless. Shoot, without a big move, this entire rebuild is meaningless.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Trade Thread, Part 3: The Fun Continues 

Post#200 » by sully00 » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:21 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
NYG wrote:What pick(s) would Boston add to Vincent Poirier and Semi Ojeleye for Montrezl Harrell if the Clippers offered that as part of a bigger deal on their end?


The problem is that we’d have the same problem that would cause the Clippers to deal him: with Smart, Hayward, Brown, Kemba and Tatum (re-signed on a max deal), the luxury tax hit from re-signing him would be too much to keep him. He’d be a strict rental for us.


At some point you just pay the damn tax your trying to win a championship. I am pretty sure this team planned on adding Anthony Davis, Kyrie Irving, Gordon Hayward, and Al Horford all making 27-30 mil a season. I am way more excited about paying 26 year olds than 33 year olds too much money. Make the deal for Harrell and hold the line with Hayward like you did last year with Horford.

Return to Boston Celtics