Parliament10 wrote:I just can't see Ainge rocking the boat, so to speak, just for Finances.
I think that it would take a major player coming in, to trade any of the core. Particularly, Team Shamrock.
John K had an interesting analysis based on anticipated cap adjustments, assumed Tatum extension and repeated tax implications where it pays for itself to put Hayward on a longer 5yr deal... He proposed an opt-out with a 5/100 starting at 17.5m on year 1 (it's on the March 30th Locked-On podcast - fast forward to 30'ish min).
But the net of it was getting him to a 5yr this summer by avoiding the luxury tax line (and starting the counter for the repeater) ends up being a wash. Think of it as financing the tail end of his new contract with money saved from avoiding the tax and subsequent repeater taxes.
So in the Celtic's favor (assuming you want to keep Hayward, which I do)... You can structure a compelling deal to Gordo for long term stability (remember, he has 4 kids) that nets him a collective extra $66m of wealth at no real expense to the company.
[quote=“dkb964”]156-1 Celtics are frauds when pressure is put on them. They would have been toast if Luka was not stupid enough to foul himself out. Enjoy this ONE finals win. There will never be another with the Js and the Celtics cant afford stacked team.[/quote]