ImageImageImage

Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,706
And1: 31,252
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1861 » by 31to6 » Thu May 18, 2017 11:56 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


Well to each his own then. I'm not that high on Fultz like some of you over here.. Dont see big superstar potential in him.

i'm just not so sure you can say that considering he is doing things nobody else coming out of college has in decades


i dunno LBF; I'm certainly pumped about the pick but think you and some others might be getting a bit ahead of things here.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,337
And1: 61,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1862 » by Froob » Fri May 19, 2017 12:34 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.

He's worth more than Giannis?
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1863 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Fri May 19, 2017 12:41 am

Froob wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.

He's worth more than Giannis?

i think thats his benchmark, not sure GIannis has quite the same skills, but obv more athletic
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
sarcasma
Junior
Posts: 447
And1: 250
Joined: Aug 01, 2007

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1864 » by sarcasma » Fri May 19, 2017 1:07 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:so many of the things that Fultz does, you can't "practice" you can't "work on" you can't "get better at" they are things you either can or cannot do, and thats what separates superstars from stars and starters.


Give me some examples. Trust me, I want to keep him.
sarcasma
Junior
Posts: 447
And1: 250
Joined: Aug 01, 2007

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1865 » by sarcasma » Fri May 19, 2017 1:12 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


Well to each his own then. I'm not that high on Fultz like some of you over here.. Dont see big superstar potential in him.

i'm just not so sure you can say that considering he is doing things nobody else coming out of college has in decades


He may have the best floater in the league RIGHT NOW....and hes not even in the league yet.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1866 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Fri May 19, 2017 1:43 am

Bradley, Zeller, Crowder and Bkn 18 for George if he agrees to an extension right away.

Sign Griffin.

IT/Fultz
Brown/Smart
George/ Nader
Griffin/
Horford/Zizic

Assume we couldn't make that happen if we brought Olynyk back..but I'm willing to lose the guy to get that starting 5. Could maybe use some mle money or vet min on a couple guys like Nene or Paul Gasol. Maybe trade Rozier for a PF?

Reality is we need to open up playing time for Jaylen and Fultz. So what better way to do that than to turn the guys in front of them into 1 big time stud that will replace their production and open minutes for them in the rotation? Griffin might be far fetched..but if we pull a PG13 trade off on draft night I don't see a better situation for him. Worst case scenario we never get over the hump with that core but enter George's early 30's with Fultz and Brown as possible stars, Zizic and Yabu as possible solid starters, trade IT at the backend of his deal and let Horford expire.

Would be cool to assert ourselves as a top 3 team with a chance at a chip for the next 3 years while still developing multiple studs at home. It would be an opportunity to rule the NBA for 10+ years. From everything said by Wyc so far I can't imagine he wants it to play out in any other way.

Multiple years of George as a Celtic vs James in the ECF would be amazing.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1867 » by Andrew McCeltic » Fri May 19, 2017 1:47 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:so many of the things that Fultz does, you can't "practice" you can't "work on" you can't "get better at" they are things you either can or cannot do, and thats what separates superstars from stars and starters.


Yeah I feel you. I've wondered if he's a little overhyped - esp. when his stats against good competition aren't as elite - but he does have that "it" factor - the eye test says he's sort of a cross between Derrick Rose and TMac - athletic as hell, great handles, makes it all look easy. And doesn't look reliant on elite explosiveness like Rose, should be a better long-term bet on health.

Good to know the league consensus is he's head and shoulders above everyone else.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1868 » by Darth Celtic » Fri May 19, 2017 1:51 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.

Preach
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
ViperGTS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jul 04, 2016

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1869 » by ViperGTS » Fri May 19, 2017 2:21 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:so many of the things that Fultz does, you can't "practice" you can't "work on" you can't "get better at" they are things you either can or cannot do, and thats what separates superstars from stars and starters.


Same thing I feel about Jaylen. His drive and ability to get "dirty" is innate. He'll be a phenomenal rebounder as he matures. His hang time is insane.
User avatar
AgentGreen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,940
And1: 3,481
Joined: Feb 12, 2013
Location: Greentown
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1870 » by AgentGreen » Fri May 19, 2017 6:28 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


Well to each his own then. I'm not that high on Fultz like some of you over here.. Dont see big superstar potential in him.

i'm just not so sure you can say that considering he is doing things nobody else coming out of college has in decades


Wasn´t Beasley considered one of the most polished offensive talents in years? People where telling us that Wiggins is a generational talent and would be the next Lebron..

I'm not saying that Fultz will be a bust. i think that he will be a very good scorer in the league eventually, but thats it.. nothing more.

If we are talking about Fultz showing stuff that nobody's shown in the last decades. Sorry but i dont agree with that at all. Kyrie was the last guard who came out of college with one the most complete offensive package and dribbling skills that nobody had seen in years.
Image
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1871 » by Edug27 » Fri May 19, 2017 6:43 am

AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.


Boston would gladly add anything else they want to the package. That's how good AD is.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1872 » by Edug27 » Fri May 19, 2017 6:54 am

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


Yep. This isn't like the Wiggins/Love situation. We aren't signing Lebron this summer. You don't trade a 19 year old stud like Fultz for guys in their late 20's who aren't going to put us over the Cavs as long as Lebron is still there.

AD is the only guy worth discussing but it's not really much of a discussion as he isn't on the market. I do think Danny would at least spend a second thinking about Porz, but wouldn't do it. I'm a big Porz fan and think Brad could do wonders with him. But Fultz is the real deal here. The kid can score. And Brad has shown the success he can have running his system around a big time scorer.

The question becomes what to do with IT. Can he play with Fultz? Do you pay IT? Is Fultz a PG or 2? If he's a PG, then why resign IT. If he's a 2, then do you move Avery? Also, is Jaylen ready to take over for Crowder? Does Crowder really provide more than what Jaylen is capable of? If we sign Hayward, and draft Fultz, are we saying Jaylen will never be a starter here? Is 24 year old Jaylen better than current Hayward?

Oh so many questions.
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1873 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Fri May 19, 2017 7:10 am

Edug27 wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


Yep. This isn't like the Wiggins/Love situation. We aren't signing Lebron this summer. You don't trade a 19 year old stud like Fultz for guys in their late 20's who aren't going to put us over the Cavs as long as Lebron is still there.

AD is the only guy worth discussing but it's not really much of a discussion as he isn't on the market. I do think Danny would at least spend a second thinking about Porz, but wouldn't do it. I'm a big Porz fan and think Brad could do wonders with him. But Fultz is the real deal here. The kid can score. And Brad has shown the success he can have running his system around a big time scorer.

The question becomes what to do with IT. Can he play with Fultz? Do you pay IT? Is Fultz a PG or 2? If he's a PG, then why resign IT. If he's a 2, then do you move Avery? Also, is Jaylen ready to take over for Crowder? Does Crowder really provide more than what Jaylen is capable of? If we sign Hayward, and draft Fultz, are we saying Jaylen will never be a starter here? Is 24 year old Jaylen better than current Hayward?

Oh so many questions.

yep, all the yep.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
claycarver
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,652
And1: 2,099
Joined: Jun 18, 2014
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1874 » by claycarver » Fri May 19, 2017 9:24 am

I wonder how annoying it is to Klay Thompson that he doesn't even make 3rd team all NBA with Durant in town. I doubt he's annoyed enough to demand a trade, but who knows. Win a championship, get zero recognition, maybe thinks, "this sucks, I'd rather be a core piece of the next championship rather than 4th banana."

Yeah, probably not :)
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1875 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri May 19, 2017 1:25 pm

claycarver wrote:I wonder how annoying it is to Klay Thompson that he doesn't even make 3rd team all NBA with Durant in town. I doubt he's annoyed enough to demand a trade, but who knows. Win a championship, get zero recognition, maybe thinks, "this sucks, I'd rather be a core piece of the next championship rather than 4th banana."

Yeah, probably not :)


Hmm, I wonder if Klay takes a paycut and if Durant and Steph each take significant paycuts to have each other on the team. Keep in mind that Curry hasn't made as much cash as Durant has- 12 a year for 2 times MVP is pretty darn bad. He probably wants to cash in.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1876 » by Banks2Pierce » Fri May 19, 2017 1:32 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.

Preach


It's ridiculous to say anyone having a discussion around guys like Giannis, Towns, and Porzingis is clueless. Knicks are probably the only team that doesn't immediately hang up.
Roddy B for 3
Analyst
Posts: 3,544
And1: 1,042
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1877 » by Roddy B for 3 » Fri May 19, 2017 1:35 pm

Drummond/Olynyk
Horford/Crowder
Crowder/Brown
Fultz/Smart
Thomas/Rozier/Jackson

Boston trades Bradley for #11
Boston trades #11 + 2018 Boston 1st + 2019 Memphis 1st (or Rozier/Olynyk) + Johnson for Drummond

Or

Adams/Johnson
Horford/Olynyk
Crowder/Brown
Fultz/Smart
Thomas/Jackson

Boston trades: BKN 2018 + Bradley for OKC trades: Adams

OKC trades: Oladipo + 21 for Charlotte trades: Williams + 11


Gibson/Kanter
Williams/Collins
Roberson
Bradley
Westbrook
+2018 BKN

Charlotte:
Zeller
MKG/Kaminsky
Batum
Oladipo
Walker
+23
7/1/2019
(I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)
CelticsLV
Head Coach
Posts: 6,731
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1878 » by CelticsLV » Fri May 19, 2017 1:48 pm

But in reality you have to value number 1 pick as high as possible. Maybe Fultz translates so well to the NBA that he averages 20/5/5 right out of the gate. His skillset is that well rounded and polished at the age of 19. Nobody expected Towns to be so successful right away either. But here we are 2 years later and he's untouchable, posting up crazy numbers.

At that point you would simply laugh at offer like Butler for Fultz staright up.
TheOGJabroni
Head Coach
Posts: 6,475
And1: 1,994
Joined: Jul 28, 2007
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1879 » by TheOGJabroni » Fri May 19, 2017 5:25 pm

As I've seen a few times now, only guy I'm trading this pick (and more) for is Anthony Davis.

Both Brooklyn picks & Brown for him. You could do that deal and still have some legit cap space to fill out your roster (and keep Kelly).
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 21,217
And1: 10,097
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: RE: Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1880 » by KGboss » Fri May 19, 2017 5:44 pm

claycarver wrote:I wonder how annoying it is to Klay Thompson that he doesn't even make 3rd team all NBA with Durant in town. I doubt he's annoyed enough to demand a trade, but who knows. Win a championship, get zero recognition, maybe thinks, "this sucks, I'd rather be a core piece of the next championship rather than 4th banana."

Yeah, probably not :)

Well when they tie contracts into these awards there's the rub for Play.

He will be losing out on possibly over 100 million if he stays in golden State as the 3/4 option.

Return to Boston Celtics