Fencer reregistered wrote:Ernest wrote:And if we do want to bring in another guard the correct answer (as it has always been) is of course Rondo. If any of our guards go down, we should offer the Hawks whomever we feel is the lesser of Nesmith and Romeo plus a late 1st and one of the end of the bench guys (Carson or Waters.) That's a decent trade for them
That seems like a massive overpay for a guy who switches teams in free agency every year or two.
I think he never got a huge pay day, and was probably heavily influenced by seeing KG get paid so much. His contract is for this year and an option for next at 9 mil right? I doubt anyone would pay more than that so he likely takes it. After that he'd be pretty old so you could probably keep him for low money. A trade for him now could likely keep him in Boston for as long as he wants to play. He was the 3rd best Laker in the finals so he can still play.
Again, I'm not really advocating it as I think Teague is fine as a b ack up point guard and we have Smart and Kemba. Can never count on a rookie but PP looks solid in a 4th guard role too. But for the 9 mil Rondo seems like a bargin if you want to win a title. Obviously guard is the last spot we need help with, but if you could get Rondo for not that much and it didn't effect any other moves, why not?
For the price- obviously who knows. But Nesmith or Romeo might not be that much. Danny should have a good idea what the chances are they become good. Even if they do become good, could we then keep them?It's not like we have them forever. Any other change we add like a late pick or Carson or Waters is really such a low chance of coming back to haunt us it doesn't matter. At the end of the day, seasons come down to a few key moments in playoff games and stats don't matter then. You need guys who can will you to a win and Rondo can.