ImageImageImage

The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

CeltsfaninDC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,791
And1: 2,338
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1901 » by CeltsfaninDC » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:50 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Right it would suck to get a Porzingis or Embiid.


6 drafts x top 5 picks = 30 picks. 3 turned out to be all stars so far. That's 10%. I don't like 10% odds.

So if they draft another Oden or ABennett you'd be happy?


Fixed it for you
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1902 » by sully00 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:50 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:
aim2please wrote:
sully00 wrote:
Spoiler:


I would say there is a massive problem with that statistic or the way you are using it. Offensive Rating and Defensive Rating are what you are talking about the estimate of points per 100 possessions. Drummond leads the NBA with a defensive rating of 98 and has for the last two seasons. The Pistons are 7th in the NBA in defensive rating as a team 106.9 essentially the exact opposite of what your citing.

If I am looking at this page
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/drumman01/on-off/2017
I am pretty sure -11.4 in Defensive Rating is a good thing. They give up 11.4 points per 100 possessions less with Drummond on the floor.


You're reading it wrong. Look at Durant's numbers. +7.5 with him on the floor. http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/duranke01/on-off/2017

According to bball refence, Pistons are 11.4 points per 100 poss better when he sits. He has the tools to be a monster on the defensive end. I don't watch Pistons that much to know why isn't he making their defense better, but those numbers are ugly.

Edit: They were much better with him on the floor last year http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/drumman01/on-off/2016

Same on stats.NBA.com. Pistons are better with him sitting, worse with him playing.


His individual numbers are almost identical to the previous season
'15-'16 103 ORTG and 98 DRTG
"16-'17 104 ORTG and 98 DRTG

Someone smarter than me has to reconcile that. It maybe that the rest of the Pistons starters are just that much worse and there is some evidence to that.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1903 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:50 pm

DelMonte West wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Mid day show on EEI terrible as usual. Muttnansky wants the Celtics to give up the farm for jimmy butler and when a caller made the point that the birds, magics, Jordan's, Duncan's, Shaqs and Lebrons of the world win titles and not guys like Jimmy he didn't know what to do and just started yelling.

Holley and Keefe are the only thing on that station worth a damn


The only radio personalities I'll even bother with are Toucher and Rich (harmless radio, don't take things too seriously, frequently have Ainge and Gorman on) and Dale and Holley (moreso for Holley; Dale isn't too knowledgeable about basketball but is the best straight man on sports talk). Everything else is garbage and in constant "the sky is falling; trade the picks for treadmill city" mode.

It's painful, they act like drafting in the top 4 this year is somehow a bad thing, I doubt they've seen one college basketball game this season
CeltsfaninDC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,791
And1: 2,338
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1904 » by CeltsfaninDC » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:51 pm

Mo-Town wrote:Surely the only way we deal Drummond is the 2017 Brooklyn pick

I guess your keeping him then
London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1905 » by London2Boston » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:51 pm

K-DOT wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

Good thing Bill Simmons has zero say in the Celtics organization. If you didn't know better, you'd think he was a Knicks fan. What a goofball.

So you wouldn't trade a cheap role player, two mid-20s picks, and filler for Carmelo Anthony?
Y'all more delusional than the guys on the Knicks board


Cheap role player on an absolute steal of a deal Vs an albatross of a contract. You need to give me picks to take that contract and No D chucker
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1906 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:51 pm

CeltsfaninDC wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Green89 wrote:
6 drafts x top 5 picks = 30 picks. 3 turned out to be all stars so far. That's 10%. I don't like 10% odds.

So if they draft another Oden or ABennett you'd be happy?


Fixed it for you

Why would you go into a draft expecting to draft a bust? That's ludicrous
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1907 » by BleedGreen1989 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:52 pm

K-DOT wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

Good thing Bill Simmons has zero say in the Celtics organization. If you didn't know better, you'd think he was a Knicks fan. What a goofball.

So you wouldn't trade a cheap role player, two mid-20s picks, and filler for Carmelo Anthony?
Y'all more delusional than the guys on the Knicks board


Hell no. Wouldn't do Crowder straight up.

Here's a little secret most people outside of NY have figured out, Melo isn't very good.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1908 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:52 pm

London2Boston wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

Good thing Bill Simmons has zero say in the Celtics organization. If you didn't know better, you'd think he was a Knicks fan. What a goofball.

So you wouldn't trade a cheap role player, two mid-20s picks, and filler for Carmelo Anthony?
Y'all more delusional than the guys on the Knicks board


Cheap role player on an absolute steal of a deal Vs an albatross of a contract. You need to give me picks to take that contract and No D chucker

I wouldn't trade a ham sandwich for Carmelo Anthony
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1909 » by ConstableGeneva » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:55 pm

K-DOT wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

Good thing Bill Simmons has zero say in the Celtics organization. If you didn't know better, you'd think he was a Knicks fan. What a goofball.

So you wouldn't trade a cheap role player, two mid-20s picks, and filler for Carmelo Anthony?
Y'all more delusional than the guys on the Knicks board

Albatross contract that takes away cap flexibility. Doesn't help us get past Cleveland, let alone win us the title (which is the goal after all). Helps Knicks get out of a bind (Knicks FO has zero leverage when it comes to trading the guy). Crowder is a valuable asset because of his cheap-dirt contract and arguably a better fit in Stevens' current system. I could go on.

You can keep Melo for all eternity. That'll make most (not saying all) of Celtics fandom happy.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
TurboTitan
Starter
Posts: 2,188
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
Location: Windsor, ON
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1910 » by TurboTitan » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:57 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Mo-Town wrote:Surely the only way we deal Drummond is the 2017 Brooklyn pick


Cool. Talk to the Kings fans, who said something similar.

You're on the treadmill. We're not helping you get off. Sorry.

did you just compare us to the kings? :crazy:
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,597
And1: 61,594
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1911 » by DOT » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:59 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

Good thing Bill Simmons has zero say in the Celtics organization. If you didn't know better, you'd think he was a Knicks fan. What a goofball.

So you wouldn't trade a cheap role player, two mid-20s picks, and filler for Carmelo Anthony?
Y'all more delusional than the guys on the Knicks board


You don't get it. First MEM pick could be in the lottery, easily. Second Melo doesn't fit our system or our culture. As a matter of fact I've never viewed him as a winning caliber player. Mike Gorman, one of the most kind and polite play by play commentators said he wouldn't trade a bag of peanuts for Melo on radion(meaning in public)- I agree with him. Third - he cripples our ability of going after any FAs in the forseeable future- so he will be "our final piece".

Didn't they say the same thing about Paul Pierce until 2008? And at the age Melo is now, Pierce was only one game away from his 2nd championship, which many people say he would have won had Perkins not been injured
Look, the days of Melo being the best player on a serious contender are over. You put him as the 2nd or third option, and he'll be elite. This year alone, he's in the 97th percentile in terms of spot-up efficiently, meaning that he is much better off-ball than on-ball. Give him a star guard that controls the offense (IT), and a great head coach (Stevens), and he'd be great. Plus, this trade would leave you with enough assets to get another player, say Paul George or Butler, giving you a starting lineup of
IT
Bradley
PG/Butler
Melo
Horford
which is more than enough to contend with the Cavs, and depending on how much they give up for PG/Butler is a championship squad
And be real about free agency, no real game changers are going to be changing teams now due to the new CBA
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1912 » by ConstableGeneva » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:00 pm

Read on Twitter

It'll be a bag of funyuns an hour before trade deadline.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1913 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:02 pm

Mo-Town wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Mo-Town wrote:Surely the only way we deal Drummond is the 2017 Brooklyn pick


Cool. Talk to the Kings fans, who said something similar.

You're on the treadmill. We're not helping you get off. Sorry.

did you just compare us to the kings? :crazy:

Yeah basically. How's Reggie Jackson working out for you?
User avatar
TurboTitan
Starter
Posts: 2,188
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
Location: Windsor, ON
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1914 » by TurboTitan » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:04 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Mo-Town wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Cool. Talk to the Kings fans, who said something similar.

You're on the treadmill. We're not helping you get off. Sorry.

did you just compare us to the kings? :crazy:

Yeah basically. How's Reggie Jackson working out for you?
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
DelMonte West
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 685
Joined: Jan 10, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1915 » by DelMonte West » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:04 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

It'll be a bag of funyuns an hour before trade deadline.


That isn't a bad deal, injury history and all. We have too many picks to effectively use outside of the BRK picks. Brook has his faults but he's a good scorer and big. Wouldn't mind him as a role-playing starter until Zizec rounds into form.
pasfru
Starter
Posts: 2,396
And1: 2,794
Joined: Oct 05, 2011

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1916 » by pasfru » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:05 pm

K-DOT wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
Read on Twitter

Good thing Bill Simmons has zero say in the Celtics organization. If you didn't know better, you'd think he was a Knicks fan. What a goofball.

So you wouldn't trade a cheap role player, two mid-20s picks, and filler for Carmelo Anthony?
Y'all more delusional than the guys on the Knicks board

Melo's not great but I wouldn't call him a cheap role player, come on now.
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1917 » by Gomes3PC » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:05 pm

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:
hickfromfrenchlick wrote:
Gomes3PC wrote:Drummond is a bad rim protector, period. He's only had one year where they've been better defensively with him on the court vs. off, and even then they had a not-great 105 DRtg. Last year he allowed opponents to shoot 53% at the rim, in the range of the likes of Kelly Olynyk, Frank Kaminsky, Nik Vucevic, Mason Plumlee and Enes Kanter.

He has all the physical tools to be good defensively, but he doesn't understand angles and frankly doesn't really put in effort on that end.


I think he would help us tremendously. He's clearly not maximizing his tools. If he didn't understand angles he wouldn't be averaging 14 rebounds per game. He's clearly struggling somewhat in SVG's scheme.

But let's be real: A UConn fan's opinion and a PC fan's opinion cancel each other out.


Stan's been trying to recreate the style he had in Orlando with Dwight. If Drummond can't excel on that sort of scheme, then I'd be weary about him. Not too often a team starts offering up a 23 year old center averaging a double-double if they were happy about his play.

Yeah, SVG got the absolute max from Dwight Howard with a similar system and arguably less talent around him. If Stan is ready to cut bait, it tells me he thinks there's even more problems with him than with Dwight, and that's saying something.
TheOGJabroni
Head Coach
Posts: 6,475
And1: 1,994
Joined: Jul 28, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1918 » by TheOGJabroni » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:05 pm

Read on Twitter

Is this legit or did they not ever have headers to begin with?
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,503
And1: 33,510
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1919 » by GoCeltics123 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:06 pm

A common question around town over the weekend was whether the Boston Celtics, who have assembled the ingredients needed for a superstar trade package but have gone so long without finding a suitable partner, would make it happen this week.

Here's hoping they have the nerve to make Jimmy Butler their prize.

If the Celtics make that move, LeBron James' unshakable hold on the Eastern Conference might finally loosen. Butler to the Celtics is a big enough deal—with legit NBA Finals ramifications—to put in perspective the relatively inconsequential move of DeMarcus Cousins from one mediocre team in Sacramento to another in New Orleans.

The Celtics have reservations, according to league sources, about adding Butler after how wonderfully the Isaiah Thomas emergence has gone. There is valid reason for concern, because Thomas is reveling in his top-dog status.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#1920 » by Homerclease » Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:06 pm

Mo-Town wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Mo-Town wrote:did you just compare us to the kings? :crazy:

Yeah basically. How's Reggie Jackson working out for you?

about as good as horford

Odd seeing as we're winning and you aren't. You and the kings are basically the same team except the kings decided to get off the treadmill and you're still clinging on

Return to Boston Celtics