fallguy wrote:What do people value more highly - the #3 pick or Jaylen?
Jaylen by a country mile
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
                                     
                                                       
               fallguy wrote:What do people value more highly - the #3 pick or Jaylen?
fallguy wrote:What do people value more highly - the #3 pick or Jaylen?
wickerhd wrote:
Props for coming up with an offer to a board not known for kindness to strangers.
Right now, we're focused on one max FA signing (Hayward or Griffin) and one big trade. The trade target is expected to be George or Butler, but I would much prefer Porzingas. Think he's a perfect 5 in the Modern NBA. I'd be good with the 3 and a couple of our non premium firsts for him. What do you think you'd need if there is no Melo in the deal.
                                     
                   
                                                    CrowderKeg wrote:LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Who needs jackson when we just signed Daniel "Danger" Theis?
You guys have been calling our big men pussies all season long. Look what Danny got you for next season...
You can't make this **** up. I think Ainge means business, guys.
ctorres wrote:wickerhd wrote:
Props for coming up with an offer to a board not known for kindness to strangers.
Right now, we're focused on one max FA signing (Hayward or Griffin) and one big trade. The trade target is expected to be George or Butler, but I would much prefer Porzingas. Think he's a perfect 5 in the Modern NBA. I'd be good with the 3 and a couple of our non premium firsts for him. What do you think you'd need if there is no Melo in the deal.
I appreciate the kindness and respectful responses from everyone here! Really, I'm just trying to assess where our respective fanbases currently value our assets.
Initially I included Melo as an alternative in the event that the Celtics would not be able to land George or Butler in a trade.
If there was no Melo in the deal, I think the Knicks would ask for the #3 and two additional future 1st round picks in exchange for Porzingis. Celtics could either absorb Porzingis' contract without sending any salaries in return, or they could pick out whatever contracts would work.
Nevertheless, I don't think the Celtics would give up anything more than the #3 and one additional 1st round pick for Porzingis.
It's also no guarantee that the Knicks would trade Porzingis to the Celtics without the Celtics taking on Melo as well.
Most likely, a trade won't happen between the Knicks and Celtics. However, I think the scenario is interesting though, because of how a potential Porzingis+Horford frontcourt can match up with either the Warriors or the Celtics. Also, I believe the Celtics are the only team with enough assets to make the Knicks at least consider trading Porzingis if they want to start with a clean slate once again.
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...
GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               OFWGKTA wrote:ctorres wrote:wickerhd wrote:
Props for coming up with an offer to a board not known for kindness to strangers.
Right now, we're focused on one max FA signing (Hayward or Griffin) and one big trade. The trade target is expected to be George or Butler, but I would much prefer Porzingas. Think he's a perfect 5 in the Modern NBA. I'd be good with the 3 and a couple of our non premium firsts for him. What do you think you'd need if there is no Melo in the deal.
I appreciate the kindness and respectful responses from everyone here! Really, I'm just trying to assess where our respective fanbases currently value our assets.
Initially I included Melo as an alternative in the event that the Celtics would not be able to land George or Butler in a trade.
If there was no Melo in the deal, I think the Knicks would ask for the #3 and two additional future 1st round picks in exchange for Porzingis. Celtics could either absorb Porzingis' contract without sending any salaries in return, or they could pick out whatever contracts would work.
Nevertheless, I don't think the Celtics would give up anything more than the #3 and one additional 1st round pick for Porzingis.
It's also no guarantee that the Knicks would trade Porzingis to the Celtics without the Celtics taking on Melo as well.
Most likely, a trade won't happen between the Knicks and Celtics. However, I think the scenario is interesting though, because of how a potential Porzingis+Horford frontcourt can match up with either the Warriors or the Celtics. Also, I believe the Celtics are the only team with enough assets to make the Knicks at least consider trading Porzingis if they want to start with a clean slate once again.
I'd do #3, 19Memphis pick, and Celtics 18 pick (not Brooklyn) for Porzingus, does NYC accept that?
fallguy wrote:What do people value more highly - the #3 pick or Jaylen?
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               The Corey's wrote:fallguy wrote:What do people value more highly - the #3 pick or Jaylen?
Danny would ofc taken brown last year number 1. He just proved that this year.
Hard decision for me since brown didn't show alot but showed enough that there's something there. Stuff a million other prospects never do.
But pick 3 has the unknkown and could be a jackpot.
Id say pick 3
GoCeltics123 wrote:OFWGKTA wrote:ctorres wrote:
I appreciate the kindness and respectful responses from everyone here! Really, I'm just trying to assess where our respective fanbases currently value our assets.
Initially I included Melo as an alternative in the event that the Celtics would not be able to land George or Butler in a trade.
If there was no Melo in the deal, I think the Knicks would ask for the #3 and two additional future 1st round picks in exchange for Porzingis. Celtics could either absorb Porzingis' contract without sending any salaries in return, or they could pick out whatever contracts would work.
Nevertheless, I don't think the Celtics would give up anything more than the #3 and one additional 1st round pick for Porzingis.
It's also no guarantee that the Knicks would trade Porzingis to the Celtics without the Celtics taking on Melo as well.
Most likely, a trade won't happen between the Knicks and Celtics. However, I think the scenario is interesting though, because of how a potential Porzingis+Horford frontcourt can match up with either the Warriors or the Celtics. Also, I believe the Celtics are the only team with enough assets to make the Knicks at least consider trading Porzingis if they want to start with a clean slate once again.
I'd do #3, 19Memphis pick, and Celtics 18 pick (not Brooklyn) for Porzingus, does NYC accept that?
Yeah they won't. That's not nearly enough for him.
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...
GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
                   
                   
                   
                                                    derblitzenator wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:fallguy wrote:
Young was like the 17th pick. What are the historical expectations for guys in that slot? He missed on the pick for sure but it's hardly a crisis. I'm sure you don't want to hear it but Ainge pretty consistently drafts guys who outperform the expected production for their draft slot.
The consensus pick on draft night was Rodney Hood, who turned out to be a fine player. Danny opted for the younger, shiner toy.
Hood has turned into a dud. He started out strong, but has become a volume shooter. He's only a .415 career shooter and looked horrid in the playoffs.
ctorres wrote:wickerhd wrote:
Props for coming up with an offer to a board not known for kindness to strangers.
Right now, we're focused on one max FA signing (Hayward or Griffin) and one big trade. The trade target is expected to be George or Butler, but I would much prefer Porzingas. Think he's a perfect 5 in the Modern NBA. I'd be good with the 3 and a couple of our non premium firsts for him. What do you think you'd need if there is no Melo in the deal.
I appreciate the kindness and respectful responses from everyone here! Really, I'm just trying to assess where our respective fanbases currently value our assets.
Initially I included Melo as an alternative in the event that the Celtics would not be able to land George or Butler in a trade.
If there was no Melo in the deal, I think the Knicks would ask for the #3 and two additional future 1st round picks in exchange for Porzingis. Celtics could either absorb Porzingis' contract without sending any salaries in return, or they could pick out whatever contracts would work.
Nevertheless, I don't think the Celtics would give up anything more than the #3 and one additional 1st round pick for Porzingis.
It's also no guarantee that the Knicks would trade Porzingis to the Celtics without the Celtics taking on Melo as well.
Most likely, a trade won't happen between the Knicks and Celtics. However, I think the scenario is interesting though, because of how a potential Porzingis+Horford frontcourt can match up with either the Warriors or the Celtics. Also, I believe the Celtics are the only team with enough assets to make the Knicks at least consider trading Porzingis if they want to start with a clean slate once again.
                                                                                                          
                                                                         
                                  The Corey's wrote:fallguy wrote:What do people value more highly - the #3 pick or Jaylen?
Danny would ofc taken brown last year number 1. He just proved that this year.
Hard decision for me since brown didn't show alot but showed enough that there's something there. Stuff a million other prospects never do.
But pick 3 has the unknkown and could be a jackpot.
Id say pick 3
                   
                   
                                     
                                  Banks2Pierce wrote:I do really like Tatum. Compares statistically to Joe Johnson and makes up for his lack of athletic burst with smoothness and skill. Liked his defense when I saw him as well, despite some of the draftheads not liking it.