Page 97 of 99
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:39 pm
by Celts17Pride
zoyathedestroya wrote:Nets apparently signed Kyrie already.
Whew!
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:41 pm
by Parliament10
Celts17Pride wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Nets apparently signed Kyrie already.
Whew!
Good Riddance!!!
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:41 pm
by zoyathedestroya
Celts17Pride wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Nets apparently signed Kyrie already.
Whew!
Nah, was just hoping against hope that we could still come out with an S&T to the Nets. Would've allowed us to operate over-the-cap and retain MLE / BAE.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:42 pm
by KevinGamble34
Mook was good in the playoffs for us. If we get him cheap I am onboard.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:43 pm
by Parliament10
zoyathedestroya wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Nets apparently signed Kyrie already.
Whew!
Nah, was just hoping against hope that we could still come out with an S&T to the Nets. Would've allowed us to operate over-the-cap and retain MLE / BAE.
OK. Where are we now with the cap?
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:43 pm
by SmartWentCrazy
zoyathedestroya wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Nets apparently signed Kyrie already.
Whew!
Nah, was just hoping against hope that we could still come out with an S&T to the Nets. Would've allowed us to operate over-the-cap and retain MLE / BAE.
Using Klutch to pressure Philly has always been our best option
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:44 pm
by Bohemian
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:44 pm
by Parliament10
KevinGamble34 wrote:Mook was good in the playoffs for us. If we get him cheap I am onboard.
Same here. But, we may really not need him?
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:44 pm
by zoyathedestroya
Parliament10 wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Whew!
Nah, was just hoping against hope that we could still come out with an S&T to the Nets. Would've allowed us to operate over-the-cap and retain MLE / BAE.
OK. Where are we now with the cap?
Still over the cap with Horford, Rozier, and Morris cap holds still on the books.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:45 pm
by Parliament10
OK. If we can do it, then let's do it.
We'll figure out the Lineups, later.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:46 pm
by ParticleMan
no. just no.
let's move on from the mook show already. it's not like we're winning a title this year.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:46 pm
by winsomme2
Green89 wrote:lon3lytoaster wrote:Didn’t hate Morris (sometimes) last year but don’t want him back. We’d be running into the same issue of too many guys needing minutes 2-4. Just not a great fit roster wise.
Who do we have that's a solid 4?
I'll swap Yabs with Mook in a heartbeat.
We've got nobody at the 4. That's why Morris would be a huge signing.
Then Stevens can really think about playing Tatum and Hayward at their natural positions.
If true, this would be a nice bonus to the Kemba signing.
The tally would be Kemba for Kyrie and Kanter for Horford.
Not ideal but we still have our youngs and our picks.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:47 pm
by chrisab123
Green89 wrote:He's definitely not going to the Lakers.
Need this dude back for his toughness.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:47 pm
by KevinGamble34
Parliament10 wrote:KevinGamble34 wrote:Mook was good in the playoffs for us. If we get him cheap I am onboard.
Same here. But, we may really not need him?
I just think he gives us more.options and some veteran experience. Could be wrong, but i think that we lack some veterans and are too young. Of course you need veterans who are happy with a smaller role - like Baynes.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:47 pm
by zoyathedestroya
It says on the transaction wire Kyrie Irving has already signed. Waiting on Horford signing with Philly now.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:48 pm
by FlatearthZorro
Hell naw to the naw naw naw, Morria blew his FA cause of his lousy ass agent. We dont need him.
I prefer Semi.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:48 pm
by Parliament10
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:49 pm
by mbsnmisc
Parliament10 wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:PSA:
Al Horford still isn't signed.
Kyrie Irving still isn't signed.
Rozier still isn't signed.
Kemba still isn't signed.
Mook still isn't signed.
I don't what that means other than they still aren't signed.
Please no Mook. I wish him well, but I want the young guys to eat.
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:51 pm
by zoyathedestroya
Maybe stats.nba.com/transactions got it wrong?
Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread Pt. 9: Vet Min or Viet Minh?
Posted: Sat Jul 6, 2019 8:54 pm
by AgentGreen
Soo our second unit will be: Smart, Ojeleye, Mook, Theis, Poirier?
1st unit so far: Kemba, Brown, Hayward, Tatum, Kanter