ConstableGeneva wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Today is the one-year anniversary of the Ime Udoka stuff coming out btw
Might be a little over the one year anniversary of that lol.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
ConstableGeneva wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Today is the one-year anniversary of the Ime Udoka stuff coming out btw
ConstableGeneva wrote:165bows wrote:ConstableGeneva wrote:
Not sure about the Hornets, but I agree with the overall point.
Don’t the Thunder already have a million guards?
Don't really know much about their roster but their team could probably use more shooting (have Isaiah Joe, added Bertans) and a few veterans.
MeanGeraldGreen wrote:ConstableGeneva wrote:
Not sure about the Hornets, but I agree with the overall point.
He makes a ton of sense for the Magic, who desperately need outside shooting.
Hal14 wrote:MeanGeraldGreen wrote:ConstableGeneva wrote:
Not sure about the Hornets, but I agree with the overall point.
He makes a ton of sense for the Magic, who desperately need outside shooting.
Maybe. But they also drafted Caleb Houstan last year and Jett Howard this year (11th pick overall) to provide that shooting. And they can afford to wait for them to develop since they're not contending anytime soon. And in the short term, they also signed Ingles.
Lakers I think make the most sense for Hield. They desperately need shooting. They're trying to maximize their roster in the short term since Lebron doesn't have much time left where he'll still be performing at an all-star level.
They can afford to pay the $ Hield wants on an extension since they only have 2 guys (AD, Lebron) making more than $20 mil long term (assuming Russell would be headed out in the deal).
Perhaps Hield to Lakers, Russell to a 3rd team and the 3rd teams sends assets to Indy..
Not sure who would want Russell, though..possibly Miami if they can't get Dame..
MeanGeraldGreen wrote:Letssss gooo, I choose to believe this joke of a Twitter account.
GoGreen wrote:I would love Hield but I don't see any way it happens unless there's 3 or 4 way team deal. Pacers won't just take Malcolm straight up and we'll need a ball handler if he goes.
Celts17Pride wrote:GoGreen wrote:I would love Hield but I don't see any way it happens unless there's 3 or 4 way team deal. Pacers won't just take Malcolm straight up and we'll need a ball handler if he goes.
Celtics have D White, Pritchard, Banton and Tatum to handle the ball. There are about 1,000 vet point guards available at the vet min.
Hal14 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:GoGreen wrote:I would love Hield but I don't see any way it happens unless there's 3 or 4 way team deal. Pacers won't just take Malcolm straight up and we'll need a ball handler if he goes.
Celtics have D White, Pritchard, Banton and Tatum to handle the ball. There are about 1,000 vet point guards available at the vet min.
Banton has basically no NBA experience, though. Pritchard is a shooter but hasn't been proven at the NBA level as a ball handler or creator off the dribble - especially not against pressure defense.
There's not as many FA point guards as you think. It's pretty much just Jon Wall (attitude concerns, possibly washed up), Ish Smith (possibly too old, washed up) and Kendrick Nunn (not that good, can't seem to stick on any team he's on, more of a 2 than a 1)..
Celts17Pride wrote:Hal14 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Celtics have D White, Pritchard, Banton and Tatum to handle the ball. There are about 1,000 vet point guards available at the vet min.
Banton has basically no NBA experience, though. Pritchard is a shooter but hasn't been proven at the NBA level as a ball handler or creator off the dribble - especially not against pressure defense.
There's not as many FA point guards as you think. It's pretty much just Jon Wall (attitude concerns, possibly washed up), Ish Smith (possibly too old, washed up) and Kendrick Nunn (not that good, can't seem to stick on any team he's on, more of a 2 than a 1)..
I could bring the ball up and pass it to Tatum, Brown, Hield or Porzingis.
Celts17Pride wrote:Hal14 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Celtics have D White, Pritchard, Banton and Tatum to handle the ball. There are about 1,000 vet point guards available at the vet min.
Banton has basically no NBA experience, though. Pritchard is a shooter but hasn't been proven at the NBA level as a ball handler or creator off the dribble - especially not against pressure defense.
There's not as many FA point guards as you think. It's pretty much just Jon Wall (attitude concerns, possibly washed up), Ish Smith (possibly too old, washed up) and Kendrick Nunn (not that good, can't seem to stick on any team he's on, more of a 2 than a 1)..
I could bring the ball up and pass it to Tatum, Brown, Hield or Porzingis.
Celts17Pride wrote:The Celtics’ social media team has posted plenty of pictures and videos of these workouts and players’ Boston arrivals. But there has been no sign of guard Malcolm Brogdon.
Brogdon, of course, was hampered by a forearm strain during the conference finals last season. Then in June he was part of the first iteration of the Kristaps Porzingis trade before that deal crumbled and Marcus Smart ended up in the three-team transaction instead.
Brogdon and his camp have been quiet this summer, and members of the Celtics front office have mostly avoided or deflected questions about the Sixth Man of the Year. Something about the situation just feels slightly off.
But the indications I’ve gotten are that the Celtics are not considering trading Brogdon any more than they are considering trading any other player. His sour ending to last year aside, it is worth remembering Brogdon’s value to the Celtics last year. And Smart’s departure figures to only increase his role.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/09/21/sports/brad-stevenss-soccer-investment-malcolm-brogdons-status-other-celtics-nuggets/
Celts17Pride wrote:Brogdon and his camp have been quiet this summer, and members of the Celtics front office have mostly avoided or deflected questions about the Sixth Man of the Year. Something about the situation just feels slightly off.
But the indications I’ve gotten are that the Celtics are not considering trading Brogdon any more than they are considering trading any other player.
MeanGeraldGreen wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Brogdon and his camp have been quiet this summer, and members of the Celtics front office have mostly avoided or deflected questions about the Sixth Man of the Year. Something about the situation just feels slightly off.
If Himmelsbach says it, then it’s the case. He’s so by far the most reputable Celtics guy there is, now that Mark Murphy is retired.
Even the next part, it’s intentionally worded in a way that is pretty vague lol. They’re not considering trading him any more than they’re considering trading Pritchard/etc? Okay lol.But the indications I’ve gotten are that the Celtics are not considering trading Brogdon any more than they are considering trading any other player.
MeanGeraldGreen wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Brogdon and his camp have been quiet this summer, and members of the Celtics front office have mostly avoided or deflected questions about the Sixth Man of the Year. Something about the situation just feels slightly off.
If Himmelsbach says it, then it’s the case. He’s so by far the most reputable Celtics guy there is, now that Mark Murphy is retired.
Even the next part, it’s intentionally worded in a way that is pretty vague lol. They’re not considering trading him any more than they’re considering trading Pritchard/etc? Okay lol.But the indications I’ve gotten are that the Celtics are not considering trading Brogdon any more than they are considering trading any other player.