ImageImageImage

All Things 2017 Draft

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#21 » by FlatearthZorro » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:28 am

GoodVibezin wrote:What will Danny do when he selects Lonzo Ball but papa LaVar demands that either Lonzo starts or he won't sign with the team?

Frankly, I like the idea of IT coming off the bench.


You need to get real and realize IT is not coming off a freaking bench. Not after 2 all-star appearances and averaging close to 30 points a game as a starter. Not happening, he will likely want to be traded. Ball can not demand ****, once he gets picked it's a rap. Dude ain't Jordan, people need to chill. I still don't like his freaking weirdo looking shot, still like Fultz and Jackson more.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,918
And1: 17,233
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#22 » by Bar Fight » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:55 am

GoodVibezin wrote:What will Danny do when he selects Lonzo Ball but papa LaVar demands that either Lonzo starts or he won't sign with the team?

Frankly, I like the idea of IT coming off the bench.

:lol: @ thinking Lavar would be allowed to call any shots if Lonzo comes here. Dude would get tuned out until he shuts the **** up (or not, it won't matter either way). And there are two guards spots btw. They would likely start in the backcourt together.
London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#23 » by London2Boston » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:01 am

People overstate Lavar Ball's antics. Yeah, the dude is a clown who says dumb ****, but he's not going to call out the Franchise that pays his son and controls his next 8 years or so. Besides, he will be spending just as much time on the two younger brothers.
User avatar
tlee324
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,009
And1: 8,571
Joined: Jun 29, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#24 » by tlee324 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:21 am

Ainge talked about how Jaylen Brown was ranked high in his high school rankings too when he drafted him. Indicated that he takes some stock into it, maybe.
Image
User avatar
Asian Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,819
And1: 7,002
Joined: Jun 10, 2016
 

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#25 » by Asian Celtic » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:39 am

Lavar can't do ****. Lonzo with his weird shot doesn't change the fact that he's a winner and would do everything to win, and that is enough for me to think Danny wouldn't mind having that loudmouth of a father that he has.
GoodVibezin
Pro Prospect
Posts: 787
And1: 51
Joined: Dec 31, 2004

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#26 » by GoodVibezin » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:57 am

Holy cow, I was being a bit facetious. Humor is not a crime.

Seriously, I was thinking more of a future lineup. I don't expect Lonzo to start but really, does it matter? Why can't IT be a max contract player coming off the bench? Do you want your max contract player starting or do you want him to be the best 4th quarter scorer in the league?

A backcourt rotation of IT, Bradley and Ball could be dominant. IT and Bradley we already know is potent. Bradley and Ball seems formidable, as does IT and Ball where IT (you know the pun is coming!) can play off the Ball.
robdog_5
Veteran
Posts: 2,871
And1: 2,318
Joined: Feb 03, 2017
   

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#27 » by robdog_5 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:01 am

So Sully got pretty fired up at me ending the last thread. So I wanted to respond but also I wanted to not let Fultz lack of being in the national spotlight sour his ability which IMO is greatest in this draft.

Talking about his accomplishments (maybe not records) Fultz is the only G in the last 25 years to avg more than 20, 5 and 5. Fultz is the has the highest scoring avg of anybody in the Pac12 in the last 20 years. Those are just things that I looked for and found in less than 3 minutes. He had the #1 assist percentage (something Ball is giving more credit for) in the Pac12, he was #1 in the Pac12 in points produced per game and #2 in the whole NCAA as a Freshman on a bad team. #1 in player efficiency in the Pac12. The guy played with an awful team as a FR and carried them.

For what it's worth I love Ball more and more as I watch him. His feel for the game is unreal, he has a knack for big moments and really gets teammates involved. His length gives him position versatility on the defensive end. I wouldn't hate picking him (think fultz has more upside as an individual but Ball maybe a better fit with good players).

I also really like Josh Jackson, he's rugged, he's got great potential as a defender with his athleticism, strength and competitiveness. Also is a heady player (not quite Lonzo), who works well with teammates. Offensively his shot is not broken but needs work, but he can score in a variety of ways and isn't afraid to take a smaller player into the post.

Tatum is probably my #4 because he's risen for me (when before I liked Issac's potential and length more). He can score in many ways, and is very skilled and advanced with the ball in his hands. Think he improved throughout the year without the ball in his hands. He his long, can rebound well for a 3. Don't love his shot but with his ability to shoot FTs, he has tools to work on perimeter shooting.

Basically feel a lot better with the top 4 then I ever did. What I don't get is downgrading Fultz though based on his lack of team results. He is a bonafide stud and should be #1 overall regardless of who gets it. Now if your Boston and somebody is in love with Fultz their in a position of luxury in the fact they don't need Fultz (unless Ainge is love with him). They could trade down to 3-4 and add future picks or swing a move to help land a star.

robdog_5 wrote:
Monta Ellis to Markelle Fultz comparison is as bad as I've ever seen.

He began to get hyped after all star season in which he dominated other high ranked all stars, and in USA u18 championship run in world cup (u18). He was MVP and destroyed the tournament. That's where the hype train began. Despite the lack of wins his year at Washington with record breaking performances did little to slow it down


Sully wrote
I am talking about his games at Washington specifically in the PAC 12. Monta Ellis has had plenty of seasons in the NBA where he has put up similar numbers to what Fultz has in the PAC 12. If it is as bad a comparison as you have ever seen you should explain yourself because talking about u18 basketball doesn't mean anything. I don't give a **** about the hype train.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/e/ellismo01.html

Fultz is 6'3.5" in shoes with a freaky long wingspan. He put on a show against non conference teams and then sort of faded in conference play and then went down with a knee injury.

What record did he break?
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,918
And1: 17,233
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#28 » by Bar Fight » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:30 am

sully00 wrote:That isn't anyone's fault Fultz only played 13 games since 1/1/17 and 4 games since 2/1/17.

If your job is to cover college basketball/NBA/the Draft, you should probably watch some tape of the projected number 1 pick in the draft if you're going to be discussing this stuff on TV. Especially when you're gonna diss him on TV for his team not being good/in the tournament. Anyone who even watched a little bit of Washington this year could tell you he was playing with little to no talent.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,848
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#29 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:06 am

Sully00 wrote:

I am talking about his games at Washington specifically in the PAC 12. Monta Ellis has had plenty of seasons in the NBA where he has put up similar numbers to what Fultz has in the PAC 12. If it is as bad a comparison as you have ever seen you should explain yourself because talking about u18 basketball doesn't mean anything. I don't give a **** about the hype train.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/e/ellismo01.html

Fultz is 6'3.5" in shoes with a freaky long wingspan. He put on a show against non conference teams and then sort of faded in conference play and then went down with a knee injury.

What record did he break?


Monta Ellis is a career 32% shooter from 3. Fultz shot 41% from 3 this year. Fultz is a more natural passer, a better rebounder, projects to be a better slasher to the rim, should be a better defender and is the better shooter.

You're clearly making a comparison by looking at raw PPG-RPG-APG. It's not valid. Fultz projects to be way above Monta as a player.

His averages went down minimally in conference. Stop reaching.

And go find the last freshman to put up 20-5-5 from a major conference.
TheOGJabroni
Head Coach
Posts: 6,475
And1: 1,994
Joined: Jul 28, 2007
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#30 » by TheOGJabroni » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:10 pm

Rexperez wrote:At this rate nobody knows how DA's big board looks like. Probably might be

1)Ball
2)Jackson
3)Fultz

We never know. I just hope we land in the top 3 and i'd be happy with any.

and please no butler/george!

It's possible. Not really an amazing source because we've heard his other "rumors" or just chatter but Scal said on broadcast that he knows Ainge loves Fultz a little while ago. Not exactly a stretch but I'd put a little stock into that. I know Ainge also mentioned he doesn't put much stock into the tourney either so that supports the case. Lastly, he stated a lot can change once he brings them in and gets a feel for their game, personality, IQ, etc.

I think that last piece is especially important here because Danny often drafts guys that weren't on par with "expert" big boards. I think a ton changes here when he brings guys to Boston for workouts.

Right now I think:

1. Fultz
2. Ball
3. Jackson
4. Tatum

But a lot can change fast.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,158
And1: 15,020
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#31 » by 165bows » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:19 pm

CsBsSoxPhins wrote:
Rexperez wrote:At this rate nobody knows how DA's big board looks like. Probably might be

1)Ball
2)Jackson
3)Fultz

We never know. I just hope we land in the top 3 and i'd be happy with any.

and please no butler/george!

It's possible. Not really an amazing source because we've heard his other "rumors" or just chatter but Scal said on broadcast that he knows Ainge loves Fultz a little while ago. Not exactly a stretch but I'd put a little stock into that. I know Ainge also mentioned he doesn't put much stock into the tourney either so that supports the case. Lastly, he stated a lot can change once he brings them in and gets a feel for their game, personality, IQ, etc.

I think that last piece is especially important here because Danny often drafts guys that weren't on par with "expert" big boards. I think a ton changes here when he brings guys to Boston for workouts.

Right now I think:

1. Fultz
2. Ball
3. Jackson
4. Tatum

But a lot can change fast.

Bulpett also claimed on Larry Russell's podcast that Fultz could be a 'transformative' player, and was the team's top target.
rmal8852
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 929
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#32 » by rmal8852 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:04 pm

truth18 wrote:Shame chamber:

SmartWentCrazy (184)
Homerclease (112)
Edug27 (78)

rmal8852 (70)
London2Boston (65)
jmr07019 (63)
jrob23 (59)
Bar Fight (58)
Fruit Pastilles (54)

Wes-J (46)
31to6 (41)
Andrew McCeltic (41)
Patsfan81 (35)
bucknersrevenge (34)
sully00 (32)
ddb (32)
Gomes3PC (30)
Shamrock (28)
Rexperez (27)
greenroom31 (27)




First time ever on the board of "honor'/shame; honored to be among such prolific and passionate posters.
lon3lytoaster
General Manager
Posts: 7,688
And1: 6,524
Joined: Oct 03, 2011

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#33 » by lon3lytoaster » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:06 pm

Really just want to fast forward to the playoffs and then to the draft. I'm a little curious about adding three or more rookies to the roster (Zizic, Yabusele and 17 BK pick) but definitely an exciting time.
rmal8852
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 929
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#34 » by rmal8852 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:12 pm

UPDATE: Tuesday March 21st


NIT Tournament


9:00 ESPN2 GA Tech Ben Lammers (44)



THE BIG DANCE CONTINUES WITH THE SWEET 16 ON THURSDAY AND Friday AND THE ELITE 8 ON SATURDAY

Like watching and rooting for the underdogs.

Nigel Hayes

Devin Robinson

Motley

Sindarius Thornwell

Walton/Wagner/Wilson= the 3 Ws from Michigan
pasfru
Starter
Posts: 2,396
And1: 2,794
Joined: Oct 05, 2011

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#35 » by pasfru » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:15 pm

Kolkmania wrote:
Fruit Pastilles wrote:The way Ball finds people reminds me of CP3. He's like a 6'6" version of Paul in that sense. Not incredibly flashy, but is really special when it comes to seeing a tiny opening and throwing a perfect pass for his teammate to score. He was literally born and bred to play basketball, and you can see it. He just makes his team better.


They're comparable in a way because of their fantastic AST/TOV ratio's, but their gamestyle isn't even remotely similar. Ball thrives around the three point line, running off screens and hitting shooters out of floppy sets, etc. Chris Paul runs a lot more P&R's and is much more of a scoring threat from midrange. Ball doesn't have the shiftiness and ability to get anywhere on the court like Paul. Both are indeed tremendous contributors for their teams though.


Obviously, yeah, they're not perfect comparisons. Two very different players. I was just comparing them in how they both make their teams better without the Magic passes or Westbrook/Harden statlines.
NormanDale
Rookie
Posts: 1,200
And1: 629
Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#36 » by NormanDale » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:21 pm

I like Ball more and more the more I see him. He's quick and he's a better athlete than I was led to believe, he can handle the ball, he's a great passer, and I'm becoming less and less concerned about his jump shot. He also has charisma and a sense of the moment.

I have only seen Fultz in highlights and he looks like a good player, but based on what I've seen I'd be very happy with Ball even with the #1 pick.
Hear you tell it, man I'm fallin/Well somebody must have caught him/Cause every fourth quarter/I like to Mike Jordan 'em.

"I think you'll find that these are the exact same dimensions as our gym back at Hickory."
User avatar
ryaningf
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,671
And1: 2,738
Joined: Jul 13, 2003
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#37 » by ryaningf » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:34 pm

Catching up from the last iteration of this thread....

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Yikes, this story keeps getting worse and worse. I couldn't justify taking him over Fultz/Ball/Tatum at this point. He was already trending towards #4 ignoring character issues. This just about seals it.


Property damage that resulted from a dispute with his teammates' ex-girlfriend in a public place, it's not cool it's certainly immature, but come on it's property damage.

Josh Jackson is EXACTLY the type of player that DA covets: intense, 2-way player with a chip on his shoulder. He's got that KG like intensity and plays his biggest during winning time. He's certainly at the top of our list and this incident changes nothing.

***

Ball continues to be the best player in college basketball. What he did in the 2nd half against Cincy was GOAT stuff.

Banks2Pierce wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:**** ball, if we select him ill learn to live with it but i am all **** set with him. Give me Tatum fultz or jackson or gtfo


I can see not liking his dad, but I genuinely don't know how people don't experience pure joy while watching this kid run point for such a great offensive team.


Amen. Funnest player to watch in college basketball since Magic?

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:My big fear with Ball was his ability to penetrate. However, some of those fears were quelled last night when he made a few nice plays off the dribble. Also saw him hit a nice little pull-up jumper off the dribble. His shot is ugly, but it looks like he only shoots when he has the space to get it off. As unorthodox as it is, he's got a quick release. In terms of things I value about a jumper, it's accuracy, quickness of release, then form. Reggie Miller's jumper was whack, but it worked out well for him. Ball might be able to get by with that heave. Lol.


Re: the bolded--that space isn't just given to him, he's creating that space. He's got great footwork, balance, and ball handling ability, and uses it not only to create shots for others, but to get his shooting hand free. His whack release point only really is a negative when he's going right--the very few times he's done that this year he takes a hell of a time gathering before he rises up. I think he'll eventually develop a push shot/floater to use when penetrating the lane to his right. But at the top of the key or in transition it's really not an issue.

sully00 wrote:
CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:Josh Jackson just hit a stepback 3 pointer off the dribble. All set on him if we don't land Fultz. Him or Tatum. Still not sold on Ball and his inflated stats.

EDIT: and as I was typing this, he just went behind his back off the dribble to hit a 16 footer. Yeah, give me Josh Jackson if we don't get Fultz.


The only player in the conversation with inflated stats is Fultz he put up numbers in non conference play on a loser and bailed on the second half of conference play. No player like him he as ever been taken first overall.


Yeah, the bad team/teammates excuse goes both ways. What gives me pause with Fultz is that if I imagine him switching places with Ball and projecting each team's win totals. Switch the two guys with their respective teams and I think Ball improves Washington's win total while Fultz loses more than 3 games with UCLA. Some of that is about fit/teammates/coaching, but most of it is about the ability of Ball to fit his game to his teammates and then use his extraordinary sense of timing to take over games when needed. Fultz is just out there playing, irrespective of time or situation, while Ball is just on a higher level. It's the checkers versus chess analogy. He makes guys better *and* knows when he has to just take over the game to get the W. This is what Magic and Bird did too.

sully00 wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
sully00 wrote:That is what makes Ball special if your watching. Grabs the rebound and penetrates the lane and then kicks out in rhythm to the shooter inside out. The play is about Alford not Ball but created by Ball.


I like Ball but I don't think he signs with Boston. Especially if they have the 2nd and the Lakers have the 3rd. I believe his dad will do everything in his power to force a deal to LA.


Who says the Lakers even want him or will have their pick? It doesn't matter the player has no leverage in that situation especially when the team drafting him is a playoff team. Dad is a concern but not that big of a deal.


D'Angelo Russell is in the way in LA and projects as a kind of hybrid between Ball and Fultz but who knows what the new leadership is thinking. I'm sure Magic recognizes how special Ball can be, and unlike himself Ball is a very capable off-ball shooter, so could conceivably play with Russell and Clarkson.

Let's just hope the Lakers have to convey their pick to the Sixers because they fell out of the top 3.

Shamrock wrote:With the 4th pick in the NBA draft, the Boston Celtics select... De'Aaron Fox from the University of Kentucky. Tatum is still on the board, whats everyone's reaction?


I'd be surprised, but happy. Nobody can guard Fox and his shot is getting better. This is a PG league and Fox is the best defender in the lottery, and a great athlete. He's impossible to guard, can get his own shot and create shots for others. I was worried about his shot initially, but I've warmed to it as of late. I like him better than Fultz and DSJ now, would take him after Ball and Jackson are off the board.

cl2117 wrote:What's gone on with Harry Giles? Was regarded as a top 5 pick and is slipping further and further down draft boards. DX has him at 25.

Is he still going to declare after all his surgeries and missing most of the college season and hope people just take a shot on him for his upside despite the baggage? Or is he going to go back and risk yet another injury that might lead to him not getting drafted at all?

I gotta think some team in the first round will take a shot in the hopes that he can eventually be healthy.


He was my #1 guy in this class at this point last year. If he stays another year and avoids injury he'll emerge as a top 5 pick in 2018 but if he comes out this summer I'd love to grab him post-lottery. Great character and instincts for the game, and was finally shaking some rust off when Duke got bounced. I still believe in his upside but he needs at least 2+ years of uninterrupted progress to regain that upside so I think the college life would suit him best. Hope he stays another year.

Wes-J wrote:I would take Bridges over Tatum.


Me too. Better body, more positional versatility on defense, and more varied offensive skillset. Tatum is better in the post and in midrange however, and is a safer pick to project and slot into your lineup.

165bows wrote:
CsBsSoxPhins wrote:
Rexperez wrote:At this rate nobody knows how DA's big board looks like. Probably might be

1)Ball
2)Jackson
3)Fultz

We never know. I just hope we land in the top 3 and i'd be happy with any.

and please no butler/george!

It's possible. Not really an amazing source because we've heard his other "rumors" or just chatter but Scal said on broadcast that he knows Ainge loves Fultz a little while ago. Not exactly a stretch but I'd put a little stock into that. I know Ainge also mentioned he doesn't put much stock into the tourney either so that supports the case. Lastly, he stated a lot can change once he brings them in and gets a feel for their game, personality, IQ, etc.

I think that last piece is especially important here because Danny often drafts guys that weren't on par with "expert" big boards. I think a ton changes here when he brings guys to Boston for workouts.

Right now I think:

1. Fultz
2. Ball
3. Jackson
4. Tatum

But a lot can change fast.

Bulpett also claimed on Larry Russell's podcast that Fultz could be a 'transformative' player, and was the team's top target.


Yeah, I think the whispers have proven to be true before and those whispers are saying Fultz is their #1 target. Danny doesn't put much stock in chemistry, charisma, or intangibles, so the things that make Ball special just aren't going to turn his crank much. I think his board is probably Fultz/Jackson/Ball so obviously let's hope we get the #3 pick and the draft breaks right for us because I think this will be known as the Ball draft when it's all said and done.
The leaks are real...the news is fake.

I'm just here for the memes.
pasfru
Starter
Posts: 2,396
And1: 2,794
Joined: Oct 05, 2011

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#38 » by pasfru » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:45 pm

The gap between Ball and Fultz is negligible as far as I see it. They're both terrific players in their own right. Either way, I'll be happy. Same with Jackson.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,848
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#39 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:47 pm

ryaningf wrote:Catching up from the last iteration of this thread....

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Yikes, this story keeps getting worse and worse. I couldn't justify taking him over Fultz/Ball/Tatum at this point. He was already trending towards #4 ignoring character issues. This just about seals it.


Property damage that resulted from a dispute with his teammates' ex-girlfriend in a public place, it's not cool it's certainly immature, but come on it's property damage.

Josh Jackson is EXACTLY the type of player that DA covets: intense, 2-way player with a chip on his shoulder. He's got that KG like intensity and plays his biggest during winning time. He's certainly at the top of our list and this incident changes nothing.


Look up what LaGerald Vick did to that woman. Jackson threatened to beat her. That's not property damage, that's an ****. He can change, and perhaps this is a wake up call, but this isn't 'property damage'. Don't undersell it.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,532
And1: 8,447
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#40 » by jmr07019 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:15 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
ryaningf wrote:Catching up from the last iteration of this thread....

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Yikes, this story keeps getting worse and worse. I couldn't justify taking him over Fultz/Ball/Tatum at this point. He was already trending towards #4 ignoring character issues. This just about seals it.


Property damage that resulted from a dispute with his teammates' ex-girlfriend in a public place, it's not cool it's certainly immature, but come on it's property damage.

Josh Jackson is EXACTLY the type of player that DA covets: intense, 2-way player with a chip on his shoulder. He's got that KG like intensity and plays his biggest during winning time. He's certainly at the top of our list and this incident changes nothing.


Look up what LaGerald Vick did to that woman. Jackson threatened to beat her. That's not property damage, that's an ****. He can change, and perhaps this is a wake up call, but this isn't 'property damage'. Don't undersell it.


You where not there and don't really know what happened. You know that woman and her friends said that Jackson made a threat. People lie all the time. Who knows exactly what happened. It's a bad look for Jackson unquestionably but is it's also entirely possible that:

- jackson is a 19/20 year old getting drunk for the first handful of times and doesn't know how to handle himself
- he kicks car
- the female ball players dislike the male players and especially jackson because of all the extra attention they get
- they decide to teach this kid a lesson and make this up, knowing that the victim had already had domestic violence problems and this would carry more weight in the media
- jacksons really a good kid who is hanging out with the wrong crowd

I'm not saying Josh is or isn't a good kid but let's not hang him yet.
Show Love Spread Love

Return to Boston Celtics