ImageImageImage

Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
OldCeltics
Veteran
Posts: 2,723
And1: 2,787
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
   

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#21 » by OldCeltics » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:39 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
OldCeltics wrote:Celtics draft evaluation sucks. They will draft a SF that can't shoot, a backup role player, over a game changing 25ppg all-star guard.

Wrong. Fultz may put up empty stats on a losing philly team next year, that doesnt make him an sll star guard.


Fultz may have thought Celtics drafting him was a given, and maybe didn't show up for his workout with the Cs, but Magic thought his workout with Lakers was exceptional, so did Philly. All the scouts project this kid to be a super star, with a floor of an all-star in a few years.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,064
And1: 27,931
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#22 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:41 pm

Red2 wrote:I still don't get why we are building around IT. Great scorer but dominates the ball and can't defend. In the playoffs he gets shut down. Maybe they think rozier is the heir apparent but we still ahve a small backcourt. I hope to god Danny got this right because if fultz turns out to be the player that everyone else thinks he will be , we're going to look back on this as the moment we effed up. And please don't trade number 3 AND next's year brooklyn pick for butler. I'd be happy at this stage moving 3 to sactown for 5 and 10 and taking monk and collins. at least they fill needs we have. I like Jackson's motor but is danny really going to draft another guy who can't shoot? How does Jackson solve any of our needs? I get that he's versatile and can defend a bunch of positions and that he has a good motor but haven't we drafted enough of those guys? don't we need some guys with actual basketball skills? you know dribbling and shooting?


Yeah. After the first 53 points he's too exhausted to produce any more.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Scoonie
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,510
And1: 1,801
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: New Hampshire
   

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#23 » by Scoonie » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:42 pm

Red2 wrote:I like Jackson's motor but is danny really going to draft another guy who can't shoot? How does Jackson solve any of our needs? I get that he's versatile and can defend a bunch of positions and that he has a good motor but haven't we drafted enough of those guys? don't we need some guys with actual basketball skills? you know dribbling and shooting?


This. It's so strange that a guy like Danny Ainge who made his NBA career as a shooter has such a preference towards defensive players who can't shoot.
Dogen wrote:Celtics win despite Smart having -1 points for the game.
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,740
And1: 20,105
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#24 » by Ben-N1ce » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:43 pm

Harden isn't Explosive.. He sucks. Fultz was basically dribbling to FT line distance dunks in high school. Tatum is a wet firecracker if Fultz isn't considered explosive by their scouts.
User avatar
Murta
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,644
And1: 1,823
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
     

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#25 » by Murta » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:44 pm

Ben-N1ce wrote:I wonder if Patriots Scouts watch the film or look at a combine score... This is BS. They scout these players for years and a workout ain't changing that.

The Patriots and the 3-cone drill, the one NFL Combine test that seems to win over Bill Belichick
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#26 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:45 pm

OldCeltics wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
OldCeltics wrote:Celtics draft evaluation sucks. They will draft a SF that can't shoot, a backup role player, over a game changing 25ppg all-star guard.

Wrong. Fultz may put up empty stats on a losing philly team next year, that doesnt make him an sll star guard.


Fultz may have thought Celtics drafting him was a given, and maybe didn't show up for his workout with the Cs, but Magic thought his workout with Lakers was exceptional, so did Philly. All the scouts project this kid to be a super star, with a floor of an all-star in a few years.

You obviously didn't watch his philly workout all the way through. He was dreadful with nobody even guarding him.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,570
And1: 8,536
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#27 » by jmr07019 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:45 pm

I've said it before... GM's don't get paid to go with the consensus, they get paid to be right. This is going against the consensus big time. I'm happy our front office believes in their own evaluation instead of going with the consensus. They better be right though
Show Love Spread Love
User avatar
Romeiro Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,597
And1: 7,183
Joined: Jan 04, 2017
Location: Brazil
   

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#28 » by Romeiro Celtic » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:47 pm

I feel that Ainge does not see a huge difference between the top 3 PG prospects today in Fultz, Ball and Fox. Of course the playstyle changes but maybe the potential and pros and cons are balanced between them, maybe that's why he traded down to the number 3 pick.
Read on Twitter
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,740
And1: 20,105
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#29 » by Ben-N1ce » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:48 pm

Murta wrote:
Ben-N1ce wrote:I wonder if Patriots Scouts watch the film or look at a combine score... This is BS. They scout these players for years and a workout ain't changing that.

The Patriots and the 3-cone drill, the one NFL Combine test that seems to win over Bill Belichick

And they blow at drafting DBs and WR...hmmm
User avatar
AgentGreen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,940
And1: 3,481
Joined: Feb 12, 2013
Location: Greentown
     

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#30 » by AgentGreen » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:51 pm

I stated this flaw many times and i'm glad that our front office has seen this issue as well. The kid doesnt have a motor. Plus the workout video with Philly confirmed it as well. Which was quite painfull to watch.
Image
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#31 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:54 pm

AgentGreen wrote:I stated this flaw many times and i'm glad that our front office has seen this issue as well. The kid doesnt have a motor. Plus the workout video with Philly confirmed it as well. Which was quite painfull to watch.

Rudy gay, at best....at best and thats still saying alot
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
liveod
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,292
And1: 1,082
Joined: Mar 28, 2011

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#32 » by liveod » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:56 pm

Here we are saying we won't draft Fultz because he's not explosive. Yet, they haven't worked out Tatum or Jackson and it appears they'll draft one of those two. Uhhhhhh
Celtics_Champs wrote:Abby Chin always looks good. She blocked me on Twitter and to this day I have no idea and I never said anything to her. One day I will see her on sidelines and ask her why oh why.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,053
And1: 14,875
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#33 » by jfs1000d » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:58 pm

Ainge sucks drafting?

Why? Because he passed on Giannis? I reject this. He found Sullinger, Rondo, Jefferson after pick 15.

Ainge and the talent evaluators are fine.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,053
And1: 14,875
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#34 » by jfs1000d » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:59 pm

mattstermh wrote:Here we are saying we won't draft Fultz because he's not explosive. Yet, they haven't worked out Tatum or Jackson and it appears they'll draft one of those two. Uhhhhhh


We've worked out Tatum. Jackson, they want to get him in, there is little doubt he is explosive though.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,326
And1: 61,643
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#35 » by Froob » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:59 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:I stated this flaw many times and i'm glad that our front office has seen this issue as well. The kid doesnt have a motor. Plus the workout video with Philly confirmed it as well. Which was quite painfull to watch.

Rudy gay, at best....at best and thats still saying alot

Wouldn't his college tape be more important?
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,675
And1: 4,697
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#36 » by CptCrunch » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:02 pm

chrisab123 wrote:Heres the thing. There isn't a significant drop off from Fultz. Depending what you already have on your roster. The problem is Jackson is a clone of Brown, slightly better but same type of player. Crowder is the same type of player as both of them. So is Smart. Right now 4 of your players under contract or going to be drafted are in a sense the same damn player. One might be more explosive than the other but same player. Where does the scoring and rebounding come from if the team fails to get Hayward/Griffin? At some point one of these uber defenders that struggle to shoot need to develop a jump shot.


Jackson is a lot better than Brown as a prospect. Based on Chad Ford's survey of NBA GM tier list that gets published every year, Brown will be drafted as a 12-14 pick if both years were combined.

But I do agree that the drop off from Fultz is not that large. Fultz, Ball, Tatum, Jackson are my top 4 in that order, which seems to be the top 4 according to most NBA front offices based on Twitter rumors.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,205
And1: 10,616
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#37 » by chrisab123 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:04 pm

paulbball wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:Heres the thing. There isn't a significant drop off from Fultz. Depending what you already have on your roster. The problem is Jackson is a clone of Brown, slightly better but same type of player. Crowder is the same type of player as both of them. So is Smart. Right now 4 of your players under contract or going to be drafted are in a sense the same damn player. One might be more explosive than the other but same player. Where does the scoring and rebounding come from if the team fails to get Hayward/Griffin? At some point one of these uber defenders that struggle to shoot need to develop a jump shot.


Jackson is a lot better than Brown as a prospect. Based on Chad Ford's survey of NBA GM tier list that gets published every year, Brown will be drafted as a 12-14 pick if both years were combined.

But I do agree that the drop off from Fultz is not that large. Fultz, Ball, Tatum, Jackson are my top 4 in that order, which seems to be the top 4 according to most NBA front offices based on Twitter rumors.


True but he's the same type of player. He's a better version of Brown. Thats not really what the Celtics need.
liveod
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,292
And1: 1,082
Joined: Mar 28, 2011

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#38 » by liveod » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:04 pm

jfs1000d wrote:
mattstermh wrote:Here we are saying we won't draft Fultz because he's not explosive. Yet, they haven't worked out Tatum or Jackson and it appears they'll draft one of those two. Uhhhhhh


We've worked out Tatum. Jackson, they want to get him in, there is little doubt he is explosive though.

Alright, I'm with that. I do want Jackson to work out though... that dude's been dodging us.
Celtics_Champs wrote:Abby Chin always looks good. She blocked me on Twitter and to this day I have no idea and I never said anything to her. One day I will see her on sidelines and ask her why oh why.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,979
And1: 25,743
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#39 » by Curmudgeon » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:05 pm

Froob wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:I stated this flaw many times and i'm glad that our front office has seen this issue as well. The kid doesnt have a motor. Plus the workout video with Philly confirmed it as well. Which was quite painfull to watch.

Rudy gay, at best....at best and thats still saying alot

Wouldn't his college tape be more important?


Yes, and I reached the same conclusion about Fultz after watching a fair chunk of the publicly available film. His defensive technique sucks and he doesn't put much effort into it. He's a good shooter, but so are Ben McLemore and Josh Reddick. He's not #1 pick worthy, and the fact that his team lost and lost and lost just reinforces that.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Eaves: C's felt Fultz was NOT the best prospect 

Post#40 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:10 pm

Froob wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:I stated this flaw many times and i'm glad that our front office has seen this issue as well. The kid doesnt have a motor. Plus the workout video with Philly confirmed it as well. Which was quite painfull to watch.

Rudy gay, at best....at best and thats still saying alot

Wouldn't his college tape be more important?

the college tape isnt super useful, the best tape to watch is the USA basketball tape. thats a more accurate representation of the player. good in leakouts, better at steals than advertised, not as good in the other advertised aspects.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Return to Boston Celtics