I am more interested in letting old threads that get bumped stay open.
There's more nuance in those than you might think.
Celtics in 5.
Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
Moderators: bisme37, snowman, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
The Corey's
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,531
- And1: 7,584
- Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
31to6
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,431
- And1: 28,686
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Tatum train
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
post padding post
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
31to6
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,431
- And1: 28,686
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Tatum train
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
Post post-padding post
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
Tatumfor2
- Starter
- Posts: 2,437
- And1: 4,824
- Joined: Jan 02, 2019
-
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
djFan71 wrote:Bad-Thoma wrote:I've never made a wall of shame but I still voted to lock at 100 to keep them, just kind of fun. Plus without the wall of shame what the hell will fierce1 strive for?
This thread real-time wall of shame:
Bad-Thoma (2)
playa-hater (2)
brackdan70 (2)
Parliament10 (2)
threrf23 (1)
zoyathedestroya (1)
Froob (1)
Fencer reregistered (1)
31to6 (1)
Fierce1 (1)
shackles10 (1)
Deivork (1)
Green89 (1)
Tatumfor2 (1)
Mr_Mojo_Risin (1)
Nothing can stop me now!
Win it for Al!!! 
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
shackles10
- Forum Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 11,648
- And1: 5,935
- Joined: May 13, 2004
- Location: Indiana
-
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
31to6 wrote:Post post-padding post
Post post-padding post warning. Which is also my way of post-padding
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
31to6
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,431
- And1: 28,686
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Tatum train
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
shackles10 wrote:31to6 wrote:Post post-padding post
Post post-padding post warning. Which is also my way of post-padding
you don't want it with me, shackles!
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
31to6
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,431
- And1: 28,686
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Tatum train
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
31to6 wrote:shackles10 wrote:31to6 wrote:Post post-padding post
Post post-padding post warning. Which is also my way of post-padding
you don't want it with me, shackles!
yOU'Ll NeVeR tAKe Me aLiVE!!
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
-
shackles10
- Forum Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 11,648
- And1: 5,935
- Joined: May 13, 2004
- Location: Indiana
-
Re: Should we Lock Threads, even w/o glitches, & keep the Wall of Shame?
31to6 wrote:shackles10 wrote:31to6 wrote:Post post-padding post
Post post-padding post warning. Which is also my way of post-padding
you don't want it with me, shackles!
Grool!