Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
Andrew McCeltic wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
They've also sounded open to a Grant S&T where we take back Jalen Smith or Isaiah Jackson... which would give them a little more cap room.
But two "rotation players" leaves them a 45-48 win team. Mathurin has to blow up or they're boring
Hal14 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
They've also sounded open to a Grant S&T where we take back Jalen Smith or Isaiah Jackson... which would give them a little more cap room.
But two "rotation players" leaves them a 45-48 win team. Mathurin has to blow up or they're boring
Perhaps a S&T where we get either Theis/Jalen Smith/Isaiah Jackson + McConnell and IND gets Grant?
Then we trade Pritchard..
BleedGreen1989 wrote:Riverwalk2021 wrote:The Celtics don’t want Keldon Johnson. He is a poor man’s JB. Poor defender, lousy passer, low IQ, inefficient. As a Spurs fan, C’s need to pass. Not a good fit for a team with championship aspirations.
Interesting. I've always had a positive view on him. He's still only 23?
darrendaye wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:
They've also sounded open to a Grant S&T where we take back Jalen Smith or Isaiah Jackson... which would give them a little more cap room.
But two "rotation players" leaves them a 45-48 win team. Mathurin has to blow up or they're boring
Like Jalen but have strong preference for Isaiah Jackson for the roster as constituted.
Celtics_Champs wrote:We went from Tommy and Mike to Scal and Forsberg.
Now we going from Breen Jackson JVG to Breen and Doris Burke.
What happppppppennnnnnnnn
fallguy wrote:Does anyone else worry about the number of old/injured players we suddenly have on our roster?
Horford - needs major minutes/games reduction this year
Rob - made of glass
Porzingis - not exactly an iron man
Brogdon - made of glass
Grant - reliable, probably gone
With the new CBA - you pretty much have to get production out of all the guys you're paying big bucks - especially if you have multiple guys on max contracts. That makes me think we have to do more to reduce the injury risk on our roster.
Curmudgeon wrote:The Clips aren't likely to get Harden for what they were willing to pay for Brogdon. It was the Clips who screwed us, not Harden.
hugepatsfan wrote:fallguy wrote:Does anyone else worry about the number of old/injured players we suddenly have on our roster?
Horford - needs major minutes/games reduction this year
Rob - made of glass
Porzingis - not exactly an iron man
Brogdon - made of glass
Grant - reliable, probably gone
With the new CBA - you pretty much have to get production out of all the guys you're paying big bucks - especially if you have multiple guys on max contracts. That makes me think we have to do more to reduce the injury risk on our roster.
Definitely a concern. And honestly, I don't think new CBA really impacts that. When 4 of your top 7 are guys with availability questions that was a huge issue under any CBA.
Under the old CBA we probably would have been able to re-sign Grant AND use the tax payers MLE. Now, we'll likely need to pick one. So I guess the new CBA hurts our depth to some degree, but this would still be a huge concern under any CBA.
gdagod10 wrote:Looks like FVV to Houston is a done deal.
Toronto for some reason wants to remain competitive.
If Celtics were so inclined to move Brogdon you could do something like
Boucher + Otto Porter
For
Brogdon
And then send two seconds to Washington for Monte Morris.
With Boucher you can now S&T Grant for a tpe or package him and Porter for something a bit more juicy.
Not exciting, but Brad has done excellent on the fringes.
