Dogen wrote:What is going on?!?!? With this Walker stuff??? G-League????
Team is playing possum with this signing. G-LEAGUE???? LMFAO!
With Porzingis out, Lonnie is, what, 6th best player on the team?
Oh, right. He has to prove it, cuz there are 21 guys all trying to make it.
PUL-EEEZ! OK, yeah, Hauser, Pritchard, and maybe Tillman are going to get significant minutes off the bench. But as far as NBA talent goes? Have people seen Lonnie Walker play? He's better overall talent than those guys.
Now, whether he puts it into a package that fits the team is up to him. But I think it would be a monumental failure on his part to like, --- wait, we talkin' g-league for Lonnie? We talkin' about g-league? This dude can ball already. Talkin' about GLEAGUE?!?!??!
Anyway, they are just downplaying the signing because Brad got another steal, and he's a really good guy that wouldn't rub it in people's faces. Next man up, taking it one day at a time, playing the right way, playing within yourself. Yeah, I get it.
But when Walker gets on fire -- and you know he will at times -- it's gonna bring a new dimension to the bench. A missing piece. A very fun missing piece that just needs to working on locking down on D, which he has the skills to do.
****' G-LEAGUE?????
I think you (and many Celtics fans on Twitter) are really overrating him.
He's a ball dominant player, takes lots of shots but throughout his career has not been an efficient scorer (below league average TS% every year of his career), doesn't play defense (statistically one of the worst defenders in the league) and doesn't pass (crazy low assist % throughout his career, especially given the high usage %).
Payton Pritchard gets like 2x the rebounds, despite being way smaller than Walker.
It's nice to have talent, but efficiency is important, defense is important, playing unselfish team basketball is important when it comes to winning basketball. So is consistency, effort/hustle and playing with effort/hustle consistently. His archetype is not a valuable one in the modern NBA. He's had a BPM in the negatives each year in the league.
And it's not like he's some young guy with tons of untapped upside. He's entering his 7th year in the league, will turn 26 in December.
It's not about the Celtics playing possum or Brad trying to not rub it in the face of the other teams. The other 29 NBA teams all passed on offering him a contract this offseason. Those other teams could have had him if they wanted him. I'm sure if some other team offered him a guaranteed contract, he would have taken it over an exhibit 10 deal with the Celtics - otherwise he'd be stupid.
He was on a 1 year veterans minimum contract last season. So it shouldn't be any surprise that he's on an exhibit 10 now. Especially since last season his playing time went way down compared to the year before (went from 23 MPG on a Lakers team that went from the play-in to the WCF to last season only getting 17 MPG on a tanking Nets team. Brooklyn was one of the worst teams in the league - Walker was 11th on the team in MPG and 13th in BPM.
I agree that he has some talent. And I've said this before that probably the only thing this team was lacking in was a guy off the bench who could shoot the 3, create his own shot and had some athleticism. That's what Walker brings so I do like him as a flier for the end of the bench who is a low risk, cheap pickup who could potentially fill the only void that we had on the roster.
But at the same time, Terence davis is out of the league (and he was a better defender than Walker). Wizards and Nuggets fans hated Will Barton because he took dumb shots, was bad on D, made dumb turnovers, etc. Edmond Sumner is out of the league. Evan Fournier is out of the league and was glued to the bench for the Knicks and Pistons over the past couple of years. Jaylen Nowell is out of the league. Shake Milton is barely still in the league. Bucks fans are begging for Connaughton to get traded and they hated Beasley because he couldn't defend and couldn't do anything on offense except hit open catch and shoot 3's. Backup SG is a tough position in the modern NBA. You gotta be really good to stick - you gotta be really good to impact winning..
Walker is like Jordan Clarkson but worse, he's like Kelly Oubre but worse (and smaller). And Oubre was on a 1 year minimum contract last season.
You look at the guys in the league whio are backup SG who are actually good, who contribute to winning and stick around and are getting good contracts:
NWA - elite defender, plays with an edge/toughness to him
Bruce Brown - elite defender, plays with an edge/toughness to him
Pritchard - much more efficient offensively than Walker, much better playmaker/ball mover, much better rebounder, better defender too , plays his tail off, very high IQ player
Isaiah Joe - more efficient as a scorer than Walker, better defender, plays his tail off, very high IQ player
Seth Curry - has always been a crazy high efficiency scorer. Very high IQ player, always makes the right basketball play, not a cone on D, moves the ball to the open man
Mcbride - elite defender, plays with an edge/toughness to him
McConnell - elite at handling the ball, driving, getting to the basket, finishing at the rim, very difficult to guard, which means defenses really gotta focus on him which leaves other guys open and he has very high IQ to be able to hit the open man. Decent enough on D because of how scrappy he is and the heart he plays with, kind of like Pritchard in that regard
Josh Green - really good defender. Can shoot it. Just a solid 3&D type of guy who is also still really young so could have untapped upside to develop..
The common thread with all of the guys listed above is that they are either a) very efficient scorer or b) elite defender. And basically all of them are high IQ, good decision making/good processing on both ends of the floor. Lonnie isn't any of those things..