ImageImageImage

A little Celtics buzz

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,579
And1: 101,380
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: A little Celtics buzz 

Post#2001 » by ConstableGeneva » Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:13 pm

IT-Westbrook would be a terrible defensive backcourt tandem. But that's Stevens' puzzle to solve lol.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: A little Celtics buzz 

Post#2002 » by sully00 » Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:25 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Smitty731 wrote:So there are a lot of guys here who think Westbrook to Boston is basically done. Nothing official, but enough chatter that it could be true.

On the flip side, one guy heard one Brooklyn pick to OKC for Westbrook and the other Brooklyn pick to LAC for Griffin. But I can't figure out that salary matching for the life of me. Without completely dumping all the depth of course.

Interesting if anything. Yeah, hard to see how the salaries would match up.

Amir + Crowder works for Griffin.
Smart, Jerebko, and S&T'd Zeller for Westbrook.

Won't those work?


I run stuff through the trade checker and it works all the time maybe it is broken.

I had Jerebko (5) and Bradley (8) going to LAC for Griffin (20) and Smart (3.4) and Amir (12) to OKC for Westbrook (17.8). In my trade Boston is are about 3.3 mil of the 125% rule of outgoing salary, but both OKC and Boston are starting this trade under the cap so they lots of options as far as how to structure the trade. If Boston gets the two Euro first rounders off the cap, signs Brown, and renounces Zeller they are actually at about 11 mil under the cap add that to the 28.5 mil outgoing and you have a trade.
WarriorsLakers
Junior
Posts: 387
And1: 56
Joined: Jan 13, 2016

Re: A little Celtics buzz 

Post#2003 » by WarriorsLakers » Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:34 pm

why would OKC want Zeller when they have Steve Adams and Kenter?
Why would Clippers want Zeller when they have DJ @max?
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,579
And1: 101,380
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: A little Celtics buzz 

Post#2004 » by ConstableGeneva » Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:39 pm

WarriorsLakers wrote:why would OKC want Zeller when they have Steve Adams and Kenter?
Why would Clippers want Zeller when they have DJ @max?

They wouldn't. He's salary filler. Think Bogans in the KG/Pierce to Nets trade. At best, he's emergency big man depth.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: A little Celtics buzz 

Post#2005 » by Andrew McCeltic » Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:39 pm

WarriorsLakers wrote:why would OKC want Zeller when they have Steve Adams and Kenter?
Why would Clippers want Zeller when they have DJ @max?


Someone mentioned the Clippers want another center, this was in the Gay to LAC version.. And Zeller with only one year guaranteed = cap room.
User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,989
And1: 8,117
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: A little Celtics buzz 

Post#2006 » by VeryMuchWoke » Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:40 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:IT-Westbrook would be a terrible defensive backcourt tandem. But that's Stevens' puzzle to solve lol.


Bradley would be the ideal guy to pair with Westbrook IMO. Good shooter, doesn't need the ball. Can take the bigger threat of the opposing teams 1-2. If I have to send Bradley or IT out in the deal I'm sending IT.
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley

Return to Boston Celtics