ImageImageImage

The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,191
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#221 » by 165bows » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:04 am

Read on Twitter


My idea that Boston could substantially improve their LAC pick in a Melo trade starting to look like it has a real possibility.

NY will not want a 2021 LAC pick, too far out. Boston can supply the LAC '19 pick for their use and get a better, more valuable pick later. Potentially great way to turn two seconds into a future lotto pick.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#222 » by ConstableGeneva » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:12 am

165bows wrote:
Read on Twitter


My idea that Boston could substantially improve their LAC pick in a Melo trade starting to look like it has a real possibility.

NY will not want a 2021 LAC pick, too far out. Boston can supply the LAC '19 pick for their use and get a better, more valuable pick later. Potentially great way to turn two seconds into a future lotto pick.

But then we'd have to take on salary -- Crawford or Rivers or both -- while giving up our expiring players (Amir might be literally expiring atm) since Clips are hard-capped and don't want to part with BG/CP/DJ. Is that worth it for us?
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
truth18
RealGM
Posts: 38,601
And1: 42,854
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#223 » by truth18 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:16 am

CrowderKeg wrote:
165bows wrote:
Read on Twitter


My idea that Boston could substantially improve their LAC pick in a Melo trade starting to look like it has a real possibility.

NY will not want a 2021 LAC pick, too far out. Boston can supply the LAC '19 pick for their use and get a better, more valuable pick later. Potentially great way to turn two seconds into a future lotto pick.

But then we'd have to take on salary -- Crawford or Rivers or both -- while giving up our expiring players (Amir might be literally expiring atm) since Clips are hard-capped and don't want to part with BG/CP/DJ. Is that worth it for us?


Wrong person to use that with ;)
YOU LOSE
User avatar
SparringPartner
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,765
And1: 972
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#224 » by SparringPartner » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:38 am

BOSTON

In - DeAndre Jordan, JJ Redick, Paul Pierce

Out - Amir, Avery, Zeller, Young, 2019 LAC

LAC

In - Carmelo, Amir, Avery

Out - DeAndre, JJ, Austin

NYK

In - Austin, Zeller, Young, 2019 LAC

Out - Carmelo


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#225 » by SmartWentCrazy » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:43 am

Froob wrote:Chris Mannix brought up a good point that you can't invest big money in IT, Bradley, and Smart. IT and Bradley are probably 100+ mill players and Smart could be looking at between 60-80. Somebody has to go, who will it be?


The combination of the three of them will be roughly 65-75% of the cap. That's a real tough pill to swallow.

Given the plethora of guards in the draft, I'd bet that at least one of Smart/AB will be traded this deadline.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#226 » by Andrew McCeltic » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:47 am

There's not much we can get. Reddick has value, at least, as a role player and expiring contract. But that doesn't make much sense for us unless we're adding him to add him (remember when we had Avery Bradley, Courtney Lee, and Jason Terry...), adding him as a hold-over to deal Bradley somewhere else, or adding him to flip him to another team.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,207
And1: 25,991
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#227 » by Curmudgeon » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:51 am

Reddick is just another guy you have to cover for on defense. No thanks. Once again, to make any Melo-to-the-Clippers deal work, some team has to be induced to take Jamal Crawford or Austin Rivers. I'll puke if either of those players comes to Boston, regardless of what other inducements are offered.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,115
And1: 28,001
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#228 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:54 am

Curmudgeon wrote:Reddick is just another guy you have to cover for on defense. No thanks. Once again, to make any Melo-to-the-Clippers deal work, some team has to be induced to take Jamal Crawford or Austin Rivers. I'll puke if either of those players comes to Boston, regardless of what other inducements are offered.


It would be nice if they somehow would meet Orlando's desire for an established/proven wing scorer.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,191
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#229 » by 165bows » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:40 am

CrowderKeg wrote:
165bows wrote:
Read on Twitter


My idea that Boston could substantially improve their LAC pick in a Melo trade starting to look like it has a real possibility.

NY will not want a 2021 LAC pick, too far out. Boston can supply the LAC '19 pick for their use and get a better, more valuable pick later. Potentially great way to turn two seconds into a future lotto pick.

But then we'd have to take on salary -- Crawford or Rivers or both -- while giving up our expiring players (Amir might be literally expiring atm) since Clips are hard-capped and don't want to part with BG/CP/DJ. Is that worth it for us?

Not necessarily. They have the Clippers pick that needs to be sent to NY. They can provide that and get a better one with more upside in return.

They don't need to be involved in a ton of salary. That's NY's problem.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#230 » by sully00 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:47 am

Green89 wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:I will say this: if Ainge is trading Smart, his recent outbursts are probably a big reason why


I didn't like how Smart acted last night. He needed a while to calm down. His outbursts have to be monitored because just a few days after the other issue, he had to be helped to simmer down by teammates last night.


I have to agree that his act recently has made a it a lot easier for Ainge to bandy his name around in rumors, sometimes you don't know what comes first there the chicken or the egg, maybe Smart knows they are discussing him in deals and he isn't to comfortable with it.
UHar_Vinnie
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,260
And1: 425
Joined: Oct 22, 2003
Location: Almost Canadian

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#231 » by UHar_Vinnie » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:00 am

I don't know the veracity of this rumor, but CBS Sports was just saying that the Celtics are in talks with Orlando for Nikolai Vucevic. They said his defense used to suck, but it has improved quite a bit this season. A true 7 footer who is only 26 and has averaged through his career 14.5 points and 9.8 boards . . . . he can block a little, too. Whaddaya guys think? Who would the Magic want in return?
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,419
And1: 27,985
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#232 » by Green89 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:03 am

I'd take Speights from the Clips.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#233 » by ConstableGeneva » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:07 am

165bows wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:
165bows wrote:
Read on Twitter


My idea that Boston could substantially improve their LAC pick in a Melo trade starting to look like it has a real possibility.

NY will not want a 2021 LAC pick, too far out. Boston can supply the LAC '19 pick for their use and get a better, more valuable pick later. Potentially great way to turn two seconds into a future lotto pick.

But then we'd have to take on salary -- Crawford or Rivers or both -- while giving up our expiring players (Amir might be literally expiring atm) since Clips are hard-capped and don't want to part with BG/CP/DJ. Is that worth it for us?

Not necessarily. They have the Clippers pick that needs to be sent to NY. They can provide that and get a better one with more upside in return.

They don't need to be involved in a ton of salary. That's NY's problem.

Okay, something like this? http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=hn9cges

NYK gets Young, Rozier*, Wes Johnson, Crawford, Brice Johnson, 2019 LAC 1st
BOS gets Pierce, 2021 unprotected LAC 1st
LAC gets Melo

*or a lesser player
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,207
And1: 25,991
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#234 » by Curmudgeon » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:10 am

If the Knicks are willing to take Jamal Crawford there is no need to involve a third team. The ESPN scenario makes no sense.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,505
And1: 33,514
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#235 » by GoCeltics123 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:13 am

Green89 wrote:I'd take Speights from the Clips.

I doubt they trade him and he's an awful defender
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#236 » by sully00 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:19 am

SparringPartner wrote:BOSTON

In - DeAndre Jordan, JJ Redick, Paul Pierce

Out - Amir, Avery, Zeller, Young, 2019 LAC

LAC

In - Carmelo, Amir, Avery

Out - DeAndre, JJ, Austin

NYK

In - Austin, Zeller, Young, 2019 LAC

Out - Carmelo


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


I don't see the Clippers moving Jordan but I think they might move Blake, why would you want Blake and Melo on the same team anyhow?

I have no interest in participating in a deal that does not land a star in Boston. I will give up draft picks, young players not named Jaylen Brown and expiring contracts to get that star.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#237 » by sully00 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:24 am

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Froob wrote:Chris Mannix brought up a good point that you can't invest big money in IT, Bradley, and Smart. IT and Bradley are probably 100+ mill players and Smart could be looking at between 60-80. Somebody has to go, who will it be?


The combination of the three of them will be roughly 65-75% of the cap. That's a real tough pill to swallow.

Given the plethora of guards in the draft, I'd bet that at least one of Smart/AB will be traded this deadline.


There is no need to look at it that way. Boston makes its FA move before their contracts end then they can spend up over the cap all they want Wyc will pay the Lux Tax. At that point you need to start signing guys and then trading them not letting them leave because your afraid to pay the going rate.

I think Smart might get dealt but only because your dealing from strength not because your the Boston Celtics and now your afraid to pay people.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#238 » by sully00 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:46 am

UHar_Vinnie wrote:I don't know the veracity of this rumor, but CBS Sports was just saying that the Celtics are in talks with Orlando for Nikolai Vucevic. They said his defense used to suck, but it has improved quite a bit this season. A true 7 footer who is only 26 and has averaged through his career 14.5 points and 9.8 boards . . . . he can block a little, too. Whaddaya guys think? Who would the Magic want in return?


Marcus Smart. I like the contract, age, and stat line. Concerned about the defense. Smart seems to be in some sort conflict with our Head Coach at the moment and that isn't good. Bottom line is that Smart is as bad on offense as Vucevic is on defense. We need a big.
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,876
And1: 7,337
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#239 » by DarkAzcura » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:46 am

If Boston ends up being the third team, I wonder if there is any chance PP comes back. Unlikely with Crowder/Brown, I know, but I'm only wondering because I wanted to buy tickets to next week's game because it was supposed to be his last here, heh. Now I'm not so sure!
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#240 » by Valid » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:46 am

Celtics_Champs wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:I will say this: if Ainge is trading Smart, his recent outbursts are probably a big reason why


Boy is he tough to root for. I like the guy but the way he acts on the court is exactly the type of player I see myself disliking with a passion if he were on a rival team.

I wouldn't mind seeing him traded but hopefully they can get to a point where they sell high.

A guy who plays his ass off every possession, doesn't take crap or back down from anybody and who shows otherworldly support for his teammates is "tough to root for?"

Why are we even talking about this anyway? Just because some rando on a message board who claims to be an "insider" says we are trying to move Smart doesn't mean it is actually happening.

Return to Boston Celtics