celticfan42487 wrote:Big Joke Line wrote:Tyakack wrote:
A healthy hayward yeah. A hayward coming off an injury at maybe 60-70%? If he never got hurt obviously you put him in the starting lineup over smart. It's not that black and white though. We saw what happened the last time they tried to force hayward back into the starting lineup after an injury. The celtics are playing very well right now. Putting a less than 100% hayward in the starting lineup over smart I don't think is the right move.... But hey, maybe I'm wrong. Just giving my opinion. I think it depends on how healthy hayward is and how rusty he is.
I don’t really have an opinion on starting but keep in mind the lineup he came back to last year included Kyrie, Mook and Terry. And Kyrie.ConstableGeneva wrote:Kemba/Brown/Tatum/Theis with Gordo: 116.6 ORtg (92nd percentile), 104.7 DRtg (93rd percentile), +11.9 NRtg (97th percentile)
Kemba/Brown/Tatum/Theis with Smart: 105.0 ORtg (13th percentile), 100.0 DRtg (99th percentile), +5.0 NRtg (80th percentile)
That's too much of a dropoff in offense to justify the improvement in defense.
And to hugepatsfan's point, we don't use hockey 5-for-5 substitutions. Brad usually pulls out Hayward or Tatum early to bring them back before the 1Q/3Q ends so they can lead the "second unit." So not only do you maximize your starting group this way by getting them more minutes together, you also have someone to make your bench group's offense functional/more potent.
It's the same counter-argument to fans who have suggested that Kemba should come off the bench in favor of Smart.
EDIT: Smaller sample but the current starting lineup w/ Smart is scoring about the same (105.1 pts per 100 possessions) in the playoffs.
The stats take into account for that variance and aren't speaking on that.
Interesting but how does it relate to forcing Gordon back into the lineup last year vs this year which was the comment?























