ImageImageImage

The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

bennjuiced34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,560
And1: 2,009
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#261 » by bennjuiced34 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:56 pm

Edug27 wrote:
jirrit wrote:
Afam wrote:Interesting LBF. If it is I wouldn't include the 2016 Nets pick for him. We stars that can lure other stars to the Celtics. I don't see Butler doing that.


IMO you always take Butler for just that Nets pick. The chance is way higher were not able to pick Ingram or Simmons, not even saying they havent proven anything on NBA level just yet. It's Cousins or die for you I guess ;-)


There will always be rumors and side talk from Danny, but I don't think he'd touch that deal until after the lottery. Too risky. That pick landing number 1 or 2 would be awful. I think theres an extremely short list of players he'd move that pick for.

We're talking about 3-4 or so prime years left of Butler.


Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,574
And1: 11,904
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#262 » by ddb » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:07 pm

bennjuiced34 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
jirrit wrote:
IMO you always take Butler for just that Nets pick. The chance is way higher were not able to pick Ingram or Simmons, not even saying they havent proven anything on NBA level just yet. It's Cousins or die for you I guess ;-)


There will always be rumors and side talk from Danny, but I don't think he'd touch that deal until after the lottery. Too risky. That pick landing number 1 or 2 would be awful. I think theres an extremely short list of players he'd move that pick for.

We're talking about 3-4 or so prime years left of Butler.


Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?


If it's 1 or 2 then Ainge would NOT trade the pick in a package for Butler, unless he already has an inkling that 2 max guys are also headed to Boston. Otherwise he would keep the pick and draft Simmons or Ingram.....or trade it for a better player then Butler
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#263 » by ConstableGeneva » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:12 pm

Any package for Butler would have to start with Smart and the Brooklyn pick. Bradley's only a year younger than JB. If Bulls are resetting, they'd want to get as young as possible. Well unless there's a third team involved (Bradley to 3rd team likely headed to playoffs, young prospect from 3rd team + our rookies + Brooklyn pick to Chicago).

Butler + another max guy in FA (or another trade target in offseason) + high-end value role players IT/Smart/Crowder + Stevens would be a good starting pitch to Durant IMO.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Fidel Sarcasmo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,358
And1: 3,073
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: hartford, ct.
 

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#264 » by Fidel Sarcasmo » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:17 pm

truth18 wrote:
Valid wrote:
truth18 wrote:
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but I've been saying this for years. Bulls FO is corrupt and incompetent.

Haha it wasn't sarcasm dude. I know the Bulls' front office has been below average for years, but this would just put them on a completely different level of utter ineptitude.


Maybe, but not by much. They have been very incompetent for years. Getting lucky with Rose in the draft masked a lot of their mistakes.



This is so scary true.
bennjuiced34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,560
And1: 2,009
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#265 » by bennjuiced34 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:20 pm

ddb wrote:
bennjuiced34 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
There will always be rumors and side talk from Danny, but I don't think he'd touch that deal until after the lottery. Too risky. That pick landing number 1 or 2 would be awful. I think theres an extremely short list of players he'd move that pick for.

We're talking about 3-4 or so prime years left of Butler.


Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?


If it's 1 or 2 then Ainge would NOT trade the pick in a package for Butler, unless he already has an inkling that 2 max guys are also headed to Boston. Otherwise he would keep the pick and draft Simmons or Ingram.....or trade it for a better player then Butler


If the rumors are true though, the other team backed out and put the deal on hold until the off-season. Unless the 2016 pick wasn't part of the deal.

We've heard some whispers that Jimmy is available (although unconfirmed whispers) so this wouldn't be a surprise if we are the mystery team.

I just looked up how many future picks you guys have and it's ridiculous. :lol:
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,574
And1: 11,904
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#266 » by ddb » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:25 pm

bennjuiced34 wrote:
ddb wrote:
bennjuiced34 wrote:
Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?


If it's 1 or 2 then Ainge would NOT trade the pick in a package for Butler, unless he already has an inkling that 2 max guys are also headed to Boston. Otherwise he would keep the pick and draft Simmons or Ingram.....or trade it for a better player then Butler


If the rumors are true though, the other team backed out and put the deal on hold until the off-season. Unless the 2016 pick wasn't part of the deal.

We've heard some whispers that Jimmy is available (although unconfirmed whispers) so this wouldn't be a surprise if we are the mystery team.

I just looked up how many future picks you guys have and it's ridiculous. :lol:


if our pick ended up being #3 for example...would you guys do a #3, Bradley, Jonas Jerebko (5mill team option), 16 Celts 1st for Butler deal?

That would set us up nice to go after Durant/Horford or Howard in the offseason.

IT-Butler-Durant-Jae-Howard
Smart-Turner-Olynyk-FA or young player
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#267 » by Edug27 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:25 pm

ddb wrote:
bennjuiced34 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
There will always be rumors and side talk from Danny, but I don't think he'd touch that deal until after the lottery. Too risky. That pick landing number 1 or 2 would be awful. I think theres an extremely short list of players he'd move that pick for.

We're talking about 3-4 or so prime years left of Butler.


Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?


If it's 1 or 2 then Ainge would NOT trade the pick in a package for Butler, unless he already has an inkling that 2 max guys are also headed to Boston. Otherwise he would keep the pick and draft Simmons or Ingram.....or trade it for a better player then Butler


Right. But on the flip side, if its 5 or 6, then the Bulls likely don't make the trade as well. Too much risk involved on both sides to involve a player like Butler. Unless, other pieces are coming Chicagos way to make the risk worth it.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#268 » by Edug27 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:30 pm

ddb wrote:
bennjuiced34 wrote:
ddb wrote:
If it's 1 or 2 then Ainge would NOT trade the pick in a package for Butler, unless he already has an inkling that 2 max guys are also headed to Boston. Otherwise he would keep the pick and draft Simmons or Ingram.....or trade it for a better player then Butler


If the rumors are true though, the other team backed out and put the deal on hold until the off-season. Unless the 2016 pick wasn't part of the deal.

We've heard some whispers that Jimmy is available (although unconfirmed whispers) so this wouldn't be a surprise if we are the mystery team.

I just looked up how many future picks you guys have and it's ridiculous. :lol:


if our pick ended up being #3 for example...would you guys do a #3, Bradley, Jonas Jerebko (5mill team option), 16 Celts 1st for Butler deal?

That would set us up nice to go after Durant/Horford or Howard in the offseason.

IT-Butler-Durant-Jae-Howard
Smart-Turner-Olynyk-FA or young player


I usually pish posh those ideas of "player X" can convince KD to come. Mainly because it usually involves Cousins being the convincer. Which I'm sure players aren't dying to play with him.... but Butler... Hmm... He could be a guy that other star players would want to play with.
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,302
And1: 10,482
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#269 » by darrendaye » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:47 pm

Ben-N1ce wrote:
darrendaye wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:I'm hearing it was Butler


I would do a non-top 3 pick and Avery for Butler deal.

Why would it have to be non top 3? You have a 100% chance at a top 3 player at his position vs a maybe someday.


That's fair. Guess I'd best categorize my sentiment by saying I'd wince if they traded a top 2 for him and be slightly remorseful if they dealt #3 for him.

I'm very much sold on Ingram, especially after seeing how unselfish he's played with Duke. And I'm fairly sold on Simmons. I think he will be at least a Greek Freak like player with far superior court vision and passing. I haven't watched enough to debate his effort level and can never speak to his inner drive without having spoken to him, but, athletic skills alone give me confidence he achieves the level of success I referenced earlier.

Comes down to length of window and added salary flexibility over the next 3 offseasons in terms of why I'd prefer to roll the dice on top 2 at least. But I wouldn't cry about it being an overpay either. Love I always thought was an overpay with the #1 pick, Butler you can make a strong enough argument.
Member of the following organizations:
YPSS: Yes, Pritchard Should Start
RWIT: Rebounding Wing Is a Thing
AAH: All About Hugo
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,216
And1: 26,001
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#270 » by Curmudgeon » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:48 pm

IMHO the "mystery player" was Marc Gasol. There is no reason for the Bulls to trade Butler, but Memphis is staring at a major rebuild, especially if the Griz lose Conley.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#271 » by SmartWentCrazy » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:48 pm

bennjuiced34 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
jirrit wrote:
IMO you always take Butler for just that Nets pick. The chance is way higher were not able to pick Ingram or Simmons, not even saying they havent proven anything on NBA level just yet. It's Cousins or die for you I guess ;-)


There will always be rumors and side talk from Danny, but I don't think he'd touch that deal until after the lottery. Too risky. That pick landing number 1 or 2 would be awful. I think theres an extremely short list of players he'd move that pick for.

We're talking about 3-4 or so prime years left of Butler.


Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?


I do think Ainge would deal the pick if it's 1 or 2, but I can't see him adding much, if anything, that deal. If Butler requires the #1/2, Crowder and Bradley, that's a quick pass on our end.
PierceFan4ever
RealGM
Posts: 35,807
And1: 41,926
Joined: Dec 17, 2011

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#272 » by PierceFan4ever » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:54 pm

Lol if we get pick #1 or #2, there is no question we're going to keep it unless we heard Durant say he would come to Boston if we get someone like a Jimmy Butler on our team.
jirrit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,169
And1: 4,663
Joined: Mar 01, 2011
Location: Belgium

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#273 » by jirrit » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:55 pm

Edug27 wrote:
ddb wrote:
bennjuiced34 wrote:
Bulls fan here and this is a good point, from the Bulls side of things too. If Butler was the 'mystery player,' then it makes sense for Gar and Paxon to hold too until they see what that Brooklyn pick this year becomes.

Let's say the pick ends up being #1 or #2. Do you think Ainge pulls the trigger and what would be a fair deal? Just pick(s) or would he also include Bradley & Crowder?


If it's 1 or 2 then Ainge would NOT trade the pick in a package for Butler, unless he already has an inkling that 2 max guys are also headed to Boston. Otherwise he would keep the pick and draft Simmons or Ingram.....or trade it for a better player then Butler


Right. But on the flip side, if its 5 or 6, then the Bulls likely don't make the trade as well. Too much risk involved on both sides to involve a player like Butler. Unless, other pieces are coming Chicagos way to make the risk worth it.



Yeah, that's exactly why I'd settle for JB actually. At current situation, our odds of getting a top 2 << odds of getting out of top 2 pretty bigtime, no?
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#274 » by ConstableGeneva » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:57 pm

I would've done Smart + BKN pick for Butler. But since they're saying it's a big package, it's likely Ainge found a way to keep Smart out of it. Damn, I hope that deal can still be revisited in the summer. Something to look forward to.

Or maybe Ainge is just trolling us all.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
rickrolled
Head Coach
Posts: 6,453
And1: 2,652
Joined: Nov 12, 2011

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#275 » by rickrolled » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:00 pm

I have no doubt in my mind it was NOT Butler, there's no way he's worth the BKN pick, especially since we don't know where the pick will land. If they win the lottery i'm only trading it for Davis or Durant.

A pipe dream would be #1 pick, Plus package of players for Davis. Then sign Durant in the offseason....
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#276 » by Homerclease » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:02 pm

I'm as high on Ingram and Simmons as anyone and I'd deal the pick in a heartbeat for Jimmy Butler.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,117
And1: 28,005
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#277 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:34 pm

Some fans in the Bulls forum suggested that Butler would be shipped out because Krause wanted him gone.

The theory was that he publicly criticized the organization, and that's a huge no-no to Krause.


truth18 wrote:
Valid wrote:
truth18 wrote:
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but I've been saying this for years. Bulls FO is corrupt and incompetent.

Haha it wasn't sarcasm dude. I know the Bulls' front office has been below average for years, but this would just put them on a completely different level of utter ineptitude.


Maybe, but not by much. They have been very incompetent for years. Getting lucky with Rose in the draft masked a lot of their mistakes.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#278 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:42 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:Some fans in the Bulls forum suggested that Butler would be shipped out because Krause wanted him gone.

The theory was that he publicly criticized the organization, and that's a huge no-no to Krause.


truth18 wrote:
Valid wrote:Haha it wasn't sarcasm dude. I know the Bulls' front office has been below average for years, but this would just put them on a completely different level of utter ineptitude.


Maybe, but not by much. They have been very incompetent for years. Getting lucky with Rose in the draft masked a lot of their mistakes.


Krause still works for the Bulls? Or were they referring to Reinsdorf?
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#279 » by Homerclease » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:44 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:Some fans in the Bulls forum suggested that Butler would be shipped out because Krause wanted him gone.

The theory was that he publicly criticized the organization, and that's a huge no-no to Krause.


truth18 wrote:
Valid wrote:Haha it wasn't sarcasm dude. I know the Bulls' front office has been below average for years, but this would just put them on a completely different level of utter ineptitude.


Maybe, but not by much. They have been very incompetent for years. Getting lucky with Rose in the draft masked a lot of their mistakes.

I'd do Bradley, BRK 2016, BRK 2018 and 2 of any of our young guys/other picks. Not sure who they'd want, more picks or Young, Hunter, Rozier or Mickey
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,856
And1: 20,265
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: The Trade-Mill - Trade Thread Part Infinity 

Post#280 » by Ben-N1ce » Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:59 pm

rickrolled wrote:I have no doubt in my mind it was NOT Butler, there's no way he's worth the BKN pick, especially since we don't know where the pick will land. If they win the lottery i'm only trading it for Davis or Durant.

A pipe dream would be #1 pick, Plus package of players for Davis. Then sign Durant in the offseason....

I disagree. He is easily worth the pick. People just love to gamble on the unknown.

Return to Boston Celtics