Captain_Caveman wrote:I mean to say I told you so on Rondo's trade value, but I did.
So... lemme just say that if you think "winning" a trade is more important than how a trade fits into the bigger picture, you can probably just stop reading this now, and you won't grasp any of it anyways.
Bottom line is that we are better off now than we were 24 hours ago. If you disagree, it's probably because you were delusional about what Rondo's trade value would be, what his next contract will be and whether or not it was going to be us to pay him that contract.
Ange just made the best of a bad situation, and we will be in a better spot this summer as a result, with another draft pick, a higher lottery pick, more cap room and more possibilities than we were looking at without this deal.
Take it like men. It's what had to be done.
You're just thrilled you made the right prediction on this- that doesn't mean you WERE right. This could've gone differently..
Something went down behind the scenes- possibly Rondo or his agent threatening to publicly demand a trade and announce he wouldn't re-sign in Boston. Then you are talking about losing him for nothing, or worse than nothing.



























