The Comedian wrote:Dannyboy36 wrote:Could we get John Collins in a Marcus Smart centric deal?
Smart>Collins in today’s NBA.
I wouldn't want to Trade any of our core, at this point.
It would have to be for someone spectacular.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

The Comedian wrote:Dannyboy36 wrote:Could we get John Collins in a Marcus Smart centric deal?
Smart>Collins in today’s NBA.
Dannyboy36 wrote:Could we get John Collins in a Marcus Smart centric deal?


snowman wrote:djFan71 wrote:snowman wrote:I'm pretty sure that the Horford ship has sailed. He still would be the only big on the floor in Brad's system, and that was what made him leave in the first place. Plus, that contract.....I'd rather keep Hayward anyway.
I'm definitely on team keep Hayward. But if you know he's gone after next year, then try to get something. But, after some sleep I agree that something shouldn't be Al.
ok lets say Hayward opts in, but tells Danny "I'm gone after this season" or Danny just wants to move on from Hayward after next season. Which ever MAY OR MAY NOT be the case, let's just say the Celtic brass realize that this is his last year with us. Personally, I would rather offer Hayward a sign and trade option after next season, or let him walk, if he turns down an extension from us, then to take on a bad contract or a bad player. I know we get no cap relief from him leaving, and it doesn't create any more cap space if we don't get anything in return. I also realize that it doesn't give us any kind of salary slot to sign a free agent, at least not that year. What we do gain is a year away from the repeater level of the lux tax. What I'm suggesting is playing hardball with his agent. We all know he is going to pick up his option, and it's very doubtful that an agreement can be reached on a number that both sides would be satisfied with, on a longer but team friendly contract. So, After Hayward picks up his option, let him play out the season. Then offer a contract around OR SLIGHTLY BELOW what Brown is making. If he excepts great, if not then offer to sign and trade where ever his agent can work out a deal. There will not be many teams that will have the kind of money he may want, and still be in contention for the playoffs. Also, the other FA's that will be available that off season are going to be taking the lions share of that FA money, (Giannis, Davis, LeBron, George, Ayton, Abebayo, Mitchell, Morant ) as well.
Don't get me wrong, I think Hayward would be really good for this team over the next 3 or 4 years, at the right price. But, If I am Danny, I'm not going to keep this team in lux tax hell any longer than I have too.
Parliament10 wrote:The Comedian wrote:Dannyboy36 wrote:Could we get John Collins in a Marcus Smart centric deal?
Smart>Collins in today’s NBA.
I wouldn't want to Trade any of our core, at this point.
It would have to be for someone spectacular.
playa-hater wrote:Dannyboy36 wrote:Could we get John Collins in a Marcus Smart centric deal?
I for one would consider this and yet the Cap makes things so complex.. Wouldn't a trade now save Boston money this year (Smart -16 mil - Collins 4 mil) but then Collins as a RFA might get near a Max offer in 2021, therefor blowing the Cap out of the water??
MagicBagley18 wrote:Atlanta isn’t moving Collins for smart IMO...his. Value is higher than that (not saying his value to winning or intangibles) just feel they can do better in a Collins return than smart.
Then there’s the money....Collins wants his max extension. Not saying he gets it but he’s gonna get paid in excess of 20 million- not sure we want that or can do that even if they were interested in Celtics deal for Collins
Dannyboy36 wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:Atlanta isn’t moving Collins for smart IMO...his. Value is higher than that (not saying his value to winning or intangibles) just feel they can do better in a Collins return than smart.
Then there’s the money....Collins wants his max extension. Not saying he gets it but he’s gonna get paid in excess of 20 million- not sure we want that or can do that even if they were interested in Celtics deal for Collins
I wouldn’t be surprised if Smart wants that. I could see this being good for both teams. Collins is clearly the better player to me but see right on this forum there’s differing opinions on that.

MagicBagley18 wrote:Atlanta isn’t moving Collins for smart IMO...his. Value is higher than that (not saying his value to winning or intangibles) just feel they can do better in a Collins return than smart.
Then there’s the money....Collins wants his max extension. Not saying he gets it but he’s gonna get paid in excess of 20 million- not sure we want that or can do that even if they were interested in Celtics deal for Collins
SmartWentCrazy wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:Atlanta isn’t moving Collins for smart IMO...his. Value is higher than that (not saying his value to winning or intangibles) just feel they can do better in a Collins return than smart.
Then there’s the money....Collins wants his max extension. Not saying he gets it but he’s gonna get paid in excess of 20 million- not sure we want that or can do that even if they were interested in Celtics deal for Collins
Ehh— rumors were they wanted to deal him last deadline. Hes a poor fit with Trae long term for defensive purposes. I dont know who’s value is higher, but theyre within a draft pick of each other.
But I dont want Collins due to his upcoming contract. Hes gonna be overpaid and im good on him.

MagicBagley18 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:Atlanta isn’t moving Collins for smart IMO...his. Value is higher than that (not saying his value to winning or intangibles) just feel they can do better in a Collins return than smart.
Then there’s the money....Collins wants his max extension. Not saying he gets it but he’s gonna get paid in excess of 20 million- not sure we want that or can do that even if they were interested in Celtics deal for Collins
Ehh— rumors were they wanted to deal him last deadline. Hes a poor fit with Trae long term for defensive purposes. I dont know who’s value is higher, but theyre within a draft pick of each other.
But I dont want Collins due to his upcoming contract. Hes gonna be overpaid and im good on him.
I agree, I don’t want him either and I value smart higher but disagree on the value. They may even want to deal him now like they did at the deadline but they’ll get a return better than smart and I’m a huge smart fan.
I’m sure if we could find a hawk’s insider or someone who would know how they perceive him it’s higher than a smart return unless it’s a Pretty good pick but again this is a weak draft. There’s always what a team asks for and what they can get but is bet they’d do better than smart
The Corey's wrote:Parliament10 wrote:The Comedian wrote:
Smart>Collins in today’s NBA.
I wouldn't want to Trade any of our core, at this point.
It would have to be for someone spectacular.
Danny Ainge, that you?
If we just keep changing out the bottom of the barrel nobody wants players then expect the same results.
Someone is getting moved. Hayward or Smart is my guess.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Ehh— rumors were they wanted to deal him last deadline. Hes a poor fit with Trae long term for defensive purposes. I dont know who’s value is higher, but theyre within a draft pick of each other.
But I dont want Collins due to his upcoming contract. Hes gonna be overpaid and im good on him.
I agree, I don’t want him either and I value smart higher but disagree on the value. They may even want to deal him now like they did at the deadline but they’ll get a return better than smart and I’m a huge smart fan.
I’m sure if we could find a hawk’s insider or someone who would know how they perceive him it’s higher than a smart return unless it’s a Pretty good pick but again this is a weak draft. There’s always what a team asks for and what they can get but is bet they’d do better than smart
Only disagreement— there is not a better fit next to Trae in the league than Smart. Given how he is the team, that means something.


Floody100 wrote:Both Golden State & Minnesota looking to trade down for ‘win-now’ players. I don’t know if either team wants Hayward but It’s worth a call at least.


The Corey's wrote:Parliament10 wrote:The Comedian wrote:
Smart>Collins in today’s NBA.
I wouldn't want to Trade any of our core, at this point.
It would have to be for someone spectacular.
Danny Ainge, that you?
If we just keep changing out the bottom of the barrel nobody wants players then expect the same results.
Someone is getting moved. Hayward or Smart is my guess.