ryaningf wrote:Putting a guy who struggles with defensive intensity and awareness, a guy who goes through long stretches of passiveness, at a position that--due to his current body type--would require intense focus, intensity, and physicality to even break even seems like a huge project initially. Draymond would EAT HIM ALIVE and probably STEAL HIS SOUL. Think the time KG made Big Baby cry, only worse.
How would Draymond eat him alive at center? His advantage at the 5 is due to his unique combination of length/strength/quickness, and, Ben Simmons is a bad matchup for him in all three elements.
Draymond is not a world beater offensively, and is not going to beat Simmons off the dribble. If he wants to try to back him down, that's fine by me-- it's like when the Patriots run, anytime you take the ball out of your best players hands, it's a win for the opponent.
On the other end of the court, Simmons is quicker, taller and has a better handle. He's relentless is attacking the hoop, and I'd take him, 6'10 with supperior quickness, 1 on 1 vs the slower 6'6 center every time. He may not win the majority of the battles, but Draymond will end up in foul trouble.
ryaningf wrote:I'm all for putting smaller guys at center and spreading the court, but with Simmons I'd rather play him at PG than watch him be destroyed at center. Given the long strides he need to make on defense, developing him as a perimeter defender first seems like the best path forward. Centers and PFs need to direct the defense, talk constantly, and be adept help defenders and I really don't see Simmons doing any of that for a long time (if ever).
You're arguing his offensive position vs his defensive position. You stick him at the 5 to counter the look from a team like GS, otherwise you leave him as a face-up 4, much like Giannis or LeBron.
ryaningf wrote:The guys who match up well with Draymond would be Millsap/Diaw right now and Aaron Gordon within 1-2 years. Simmons needs to play PG (on offense) a la Giannis to get his immense talent to flower IMO. Then hide him on the weakest perimeter threat on defense.
Given that Simmons is taller, stronger and more athletic than Gordon, I don't find it a stretch to say he could be an effective counter as a small ball center. He has the tools, he just needs focus. With a good coach and a defined role, he will definitely be serviceable on that end from the get go.
This next part isn't directed at you, but more in general, so my apology if I appear to be directing it at you:
I have no idea when it happened, but Simmons went from being criminally overrated (he's not LeBron) to being criminally underrated. The guy will be 1 of the three most athletic PF's in the league from day 1, with an elite first step and awesome second leap. He's a Russell Westbrook caliber athlete, where he just wont compare to the majority of his peers at the NBA level.
And for all the crap about him not being able to shoot, the guy scored 19 a game in conference due to his handle/first step combination. I mean, defenses absolutely camped out in the paint (which can't happen in the NBA) and he still found creases and went to the line 11 times a game in conference.
He's a relentless rebounder, which, in combination with his FTA's, show me that he's not afraid to get physical at the next level. His vision is elite, and he will average more than 5 a game from his rookie year on.
He's not the best prospect since LeBron (Oden). He's not the best prospect since Oden (Davis). But he's a tantalizing talent that I guarantee you Stevens is salivating to coach. He's an elite athlete with the ability to play multiple positions, and really everything you could ask for from a top draft pick. Good coaching will absolutely turn him into a superstar in this league-- he's built to dominate the modern pace and space game. He will be a nightmare in transition.