Trade Thread, Part 4: The Hayward Game

Homerclease · Post #41 » by **Homerclease** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:36 pm

GoCeltics123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
Where did Harden and Danny eat dinner last night? Did we get logan airport confirmation?

Yeah that never happened lol

I’m right there under the red arrow ready to dive in at a moments notice

Post #42 » by **Darth Celtic** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:36 pm

R9ndo wrote:Doubt GS would do hayward and picks for the #2 and wiggins

because of contract even more so than because of play style, wiggins vs Hayward is huge, huge upgrade for the warriors.

It would put us in deep tax for like 3 years. That's a huge save for the GSW and the cost for 2nd pick.

in most drafts 2nd pick is still worth way more. This year that's about right. I'd say GH 14/ Wiggins 2.

CeltsfaninDC · Post #43 » by **CeltsfaninDC** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:37 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
CeltsfaninDC wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:Only way we get into top 3 is Hayward/14/26/30 for Wiggins/2

Wiggins is probably the tax it takes to get that pick, but if its just Hayward and picks I'm all in. Wiseman or Ball.

There's no chance Danny takes Ball. Wiseman would be the pick.

I think Wiseman would be a great pick, but at #2 you are subject to who ever chooses before you. Its one or the other

Afam · Post #44 » by **Afam** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:37 pm

Read on Twitter

The Corey's · Post #45 » by **The Corey's** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:37 pm

The Corey's wrote:If danny gets a top 3 pick without giving up brown or tatum. Crown him. It's a done deal.

That would be the cherry on top.

Watch on YouTube

chrisab123 · Post #46 » by **chrisab123** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:37 pm

The Corey's wrote:If danny gets a top 3 pick without giving up brown or tatum. Crown him. It's a done deal.

That would be the cherry on top.

Extremely unlikely but CHA and MN are run by clowns. GS has been shopping the two for an established player and Hayward is an obscene fit for what they run.

ConstableGeneva · Post #47 » by **ConstableGeneva** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:38 pm

The Comedian wrote:Hayward would be incredible in GS.

They have the style of play he's most accustomed to and comfortable in. Added bonus is having the Warriors seriously pose a challenge against the Lakers.

Post #48 » by **Darth Celtic** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:38 pm

Grooverider wrote:Is there ANY chance Hayward stays?

at this point it doesn't sound like it.

The Corey's · Post #49 » by **The Corey's** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:38 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
The Corey's wrote:If danny gets a top 3 pick without giving up brown or tatum. Crown him. It's a done deal.

That would be the cherry on top.

Extremely unlikely but CHA and MN are run by clowns. GS has been shopping the two for an established player and Hayward is an obscene fit for what they run.

Depending on if danny wants to win this year or in 3 years you still got smarts contract sitting out there.

Edug27 · Post #50 » by **Edug27** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:39 pm

greenroom31 wrote:
The Comedian wrote:
The Comedian wrote:I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I think Danny may move Marcus for a top 3 pick tonight.

Agree it's a possibility. As I posted at the end of the last thread, could see Smart + #14 for #2.

No way Smart lands you a top 3 pick.

WeLikeOurGuys · Post #51 » by **WeLikeOurGuys** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:39 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #52 » by **Feed Your Head** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:39 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:
Grooverider wrote:Is there ANY chance Hayward stays?

at this point it doesn't sound like it.

There’s a better chance of humblebum suiting up for the Celtics next year than Hayward.

Post #53 » by **Darth Celtic** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:39 pm

Afam wrote:

Read on Twitter

yeah, we saw that in the last thread.

Now we need to figure out how. I know he was offering just 2 picks to move up to 6.

Maybe 30 and 14 to get 8.

Timelord and 8 to get 5.

5, 26, and 47 for 3?

Post #54 » by **Feed Your Head** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:40 pm

Edug27 wrote:
greenroom31 wrote:
The Comedian wrote:

Agree it's a possibility. As I posted at the end of the last thread, could see Smart + #14 for #2.

No way Smart lands you a top 3 pick.

In this draft? For a team like the warriors who want established players, yes he could.

Post #55 » by **SmartWentCrazy** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:40 pm

Guys, GS has no interest in Wiggins. They got him as a piece for a star, but Giannis re-signed. They’d love to add Hayward at the expense of Wiggins.

The Corey's · Post #56 » by **The Corey's** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:41 pm

Someone PM howard. Gonna need some extra bandwidth once this **** nugget drops.

Post #57 » by **Darth Celtic** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:41 pm

R9ndo wrote:

Read on Twitter

That fits in my plans. move 2 picks for 8, then 8 and assets for 5, then 5 and assets for 3.

ConstableGeneva · Post #58 » by **ConstableGeneva** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:41 pm

Celtics calling Cavs for the #5 pick? Didn't Hayward want to play in Cleveland once upon a time? lol

Post #59 » by **sully00** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:41 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Only way we get into top 3 is Hayward/14/26/30 for Wiggins/2

Obviously Hayward can opt in at any time but until he does he can't be traded. I think what has happened is that Boston and Hayward have not agreed on an extension and Hayward would just assume opt in to his deal and discuss it further during FA. But he is rightly concerned that if he opted in yesterday he could be packaged off to wherever without any say in it. So Boston did him a huge favor but letting him get to Thursday with a chance of just taking his 34 mil still intact. The chance of an impulsive draft day trade comes off the table. Doesn't mean the minute Hayward opts he isn't going to be dealt or that if he opts out he can't resign just gets him to the other side and the new league year.

Edug27 · Post #60 » by **Edug27** » Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:42 pm

The Comedian wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
greenroom31 wrote:
Agree it's a possibility. As I posted at the end of the last thread, could see Smart + #14 for #2.

No way Smart lands you a top 3 pick.

In this draft? For a team like the warriors who want established players, yes he could.

You can get a Marcus Smart type bench player in other ways. You don’t give up a top 3 pick for hustle defenders off the bench.