CelticsLV wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:We don't want Melo and O'Quinn.
Amir/LAC 1st for Koufos/Mclemore would be a nice move, btw. And if we had to get back down to max cap space by trade, I think we still could.
What's nice about this move? What Koufos does better than Amir? Get 2 more rebounds on average?

You bascially eliminate max cap room, and to get it back you have to let Olynyk go AND trade Bradley.
By the way i just checked that Koufos is noticeably worse than Amir.
You already have to let Olynyk go to have max cap room.
Koufos is a legit center, he's more physical than Amir, he's 9th in the league right now in Defensive Real Plus-Minus. (
http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/9)
Advanced stats are tricky, obviously. But he's also a cut above Amir as a rebounder - see
http://www.foxsports.com/nba/stats?season=2016&category=REBOUNDING&group=1&sort=11&time=0&pos=0&team=0&qual=1&sortOrder=0&opp=0He's 24th in the league in rebounding percentage - Amir is 41st. He's about a percentage point behind Anthony Davis, Greg Monroe and Tristan Thompson. He's not an elite rebounder, or an all-star rebounder, but he's starting-center level on the boards. You could argue he'd be a better rebounder if he didn't share time with Cousins. These things fluctuate. He's grabbed 19 percent of his rebound chances before -
http://www.foxsports.com/nba/kosta-koufos-player-stats - which would make him 12th in the league this year.
In Denver and Memphis, his Defensive ratings were really really good - 98 in 2014-15 on that Memphis team.
He's just a legit center, comparable to Amir defensively, if not better, and a better rebounder. He's 2 years younger, and has less tread on the tires, since he didn't come out of high school and start playing 82 game seasons.
And he's under contract next year for 8.3 million, with a player option the year after that. Getting a big that good for 8.3 million in free agency - even resigning Amir for that - not gonna happen.
The eye test tells you, too, that Koufos is a legit starting center. He'd be the best we've had since Perk and Kristic.
The defense of Mclemore is pretty well-established. He's been horribly developed, horribly coached in Sacramento, he doesn't get many touches, and when they call his number often enough that he can get into a rhythm, he has good scoring games.