ImageImageImage

Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . .

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

User avatar
steefP2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,844
And1: 9,752
Joined: Apr 25, 2011
 

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#441 » by steefP2 » Sun Jul 30, 2023 6:33 pm

Hal14 wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:I disagree with bringing back guys like Griffin and Javonte Green. The goal here is to win a championship. That’s what the organization and players should be focused on especially this year. The focus shouldn’t be on finding guys that can “hang out” with their players.

Get some guys with an edge that will help push the players in the right direction which is to focus on the goal in hand which is win a championship

Red Auerbach said gets me some agitators and instigators, not some retaliators.

First off, who said to find guys who can hang out with their players? I didn't see anyone say that. Yet you put it in quotes, which is weird. I definitely didn't say that - perhaps I missed where someone else did.

Javonte and Griffin have not only proven that they fit in with the guys on this team, are well liked by the guys on the team and are good vibes guys to have around but they would also help this team on the court, as I already explained in my previous post.

Any free agent get at this point is probably not gonna be much better than Javonte or Griffin anyways. And if they are better, they're probably gonna sign with a different team, that could offer them more minutes and/or more money.

If you add some other guy instead who hasn't been here before, you run a much bigger risk that they're not a good fit, they might mess up the chemistry in the locker room. And it's not worth taking that chance when we're talking about an end of the bench guy. Case in point, Juancho Hernangomez. We acquired him via trade a couple yrs ago. He ended up being a poor fit on the court and off the court. We traded him away the first chance we could - and after we traded him there was reports in the media about Juancho talking sh&t about the C's and saying how he didn't like it here. Case in point, Tristan Thompson. We signed him as a FA, but he was not a good fit on the court or off the court. There was all these reports about the guys on the team not liking him, it seemed like all drama with him and the Kardashians was a distraction for the team, etc.

Jabari Parker wasn't a good fit on the court or off either. He just didn't seem to fit in very well with the other guys on the Celtics - seemed like a loner.

Meanwhile, guys like J-Rich, Javonte, Griffin, Kemba. These are guys who fit in great with the Celtics, were well liked by teammates, brought good vibes AND they helped the team on the court (well, at least until Kemba's knees got all messed up).

And don't take my word for it. As I already explained in my previous post, Ashley Battle (Celtics scout) explained on the broadcast of one of the C's games last season how the C's front office team this stuff (the player's off-court fit, locker room fit, personality, character) very seriously. She said "we can't bring just anybody into this locker room.

You hear Brad talk, he often talks about what these guys are like as people, off the court. He says how it matters a lot. The way they (as a person) mesh with the guys already on the team (as people). Wyc talked about JB's character and the type of person he is at the press conference the other day when JB signed his extension.

These players aren't robots. This isn't a video game. They're real people. People with emotions, with personalities, some of them have a bad temper, some of them are too passive aggressive, some of them are selfish. Some of them don't get along with each other. Some of them get along great. And after Gabe Vincent's comments a couple weeks ago where he said that the Heat players (during the ECF) could sense that there was something not right internally with the C's, I think that now more than ever, this is something that the C's front office will take even more seriously.

You want a player with an edge, an agitator, but you don't want Blake? That's odd.


How about the way Javonte is an agitator on defense?
Read on Twitter
?s=20

The goal here is to win a championship? No kidding. We're literally the favorites to win the championship according to the latest odds. So anyone we add with the last 1 or 2 roster spots doesn't have to be a superstar player. Just someone to contribute a little bit here or there, add some depth and not mess up the locker room vibes.

Who would you sign to fill out the roster? Only suggestion I've seen from you lately is trading Brogdon for Olynyk :banghead:




Hal, why do you feel the need to make this board so unpleasant for some posters ? The poster disagreed with you and instead of just moving on (after all you’ve made your case for your views on these guys many times over in these threads), you type a lengthy post full of implications that you think this poster is stupid and is dumb for having the ideas he has. I guess I just wonder why that is. It’s not very nice.


Oh and you never answered my previous question;

A couple of weeks ago you were very adamant we should trade brown and that he wasn’t worth the contract given his play but recently, even before the extension was signed, you completely shifted that stance.

I’m very curious what caused that shift, if you wouldn’t mind elaborating. Thanks !
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,477
And1: 21,416
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#442 » by Hal14 » Sun Jul 30, 2023 7:12 pm

steefP2 wrote:Oh and you never answered my previous question;

A couple of weeks ago you were very adamant we should trade brown and that he wasn’t worth the contract given his play but recently, even before the extension was signed, you completely shifted that stance.

I’m very curious what caused that shift, if you wouldn’t mind elaborating. Thanks !

my stance didn't really shift that much on JB. Throughout the offseason, I felt like the best option was probably trading him (whether it be for someone like Trae, Siakam or Dame. But at the same time, if we weren't able to find the right deal, I'm fine with sticking with JB and signing him to the supermax. Then either keeping him or trading him in a year or 2 (possibly for someone like Giannis, Luka or Embiid).

I also feel like a JB trade was probably not that realistic. Not to mention, Dame doesn't want to come to Boston, The Hawks probably aren't trading Trae for JB, and Siakam is telling people that if he gets traded he won't extend with that team - he only wants to stay in Toronto.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,881
And1: 2,024
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#443 » by celtxman » Sun Jul 30, 2023 7:58 pm

La Flame wrote:I'd take Greg Stiemsma over Kornet all day.

Well of course!
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,881
And1: 2,024
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#444 » by celtxman » Sun Jul 30, 2023 8:09 pm

Hal14 wrote:Steefp2, my stance didn't really shift that much on JB. Throughout the offseason, I felt like the best option was probably trading him (whether it be for someone like Trae, Siakam or Dame. But at the same time, if we weren't able to find the right deal, I'm fine with sticking with JB and signing him to the supermax. Then either keeping him or trading him in a year or 2 (possibly for someone like Giannis, Luka or Embiid).

Also, I'll try to watch my tone but I don't really think what I said to CelticsPride17 was that bad. I made a point, he disagreed with it by making some counterpoints - which I disagreed with so I replied to him, reiterating some of the stuff I had already said but mostly adding some new viewpoints that were relevant to the discussion..I did just edit my post to make it sound a little nicer. that's all I'll say about that - so we can get back on topic and talk basketball, rather than critiquing each other's posting styles.

I think the moment JB qualified for the SUPERMAX he was destined to stay with the Celtics. He wasn't passing on the money. This will be revisited in a year depending on how well the Celtics do. But I think he stays for a while.
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,194
And1: 15,060
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#445 » by 165bows » Sun Jul 30, 2023 8:43 pm

I remember wondering early in the off-season if there would be a mid-season Brogdon for Jerami Grant based deal. Still seems possible if Portland bails on Lillard finally, Grant won’t have much purpose there.
bigfoot_cryptozoology
Head Coach
Posts: 6,369
And1: 5,697
Joined: Jun 21, 2002

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#446 » by bigfoot_cryptozoology » Sun Jul 30, 2023 11:11 pm

We're Number One!

Read on Twitter
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#447 » by zoyathedestroya » Sun Jul 30, 2023 11:30 pm

165bows wrote:I remember wondering early in the off-season if there would be a mid-season Brogdon for Jerami Grant based deal. Still seems possible if Portland bails on Lillard finally, Grant won’t have much purpose there.

I put it as highly unlikely. They’re not taking on more long-term salary when they’re about to pay two supermaxes. Unless maybe if it’s for a surefire superstar.
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#448 » by zoyathedestroya » Sun Jul 30, 2023 11:37 pm

Read on Twitter

Such a crime that some Celtics fans want to add someone like Lillard or KD on this team.
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#449 » by zoyathedestroya » Sun Jul 30, 2023 11:42 pm

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,194
And1: 15,060
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#450 » by 165bows » Mon Jul 31, 2023 12:33 am

zoyathedestroya wrote:
165bows wrote:I remember wondering early in the off-season if there would be a mid-season Brogdon for Jerami Grant based deal. Still seems possible if Portland bails on Lillard finally, Grant won’t have much purpose there.

I put it as highly unlikely. They’re not taking on more long-term salary when they’re about to pay two supermaxes. Unless maybe if it’s for a surefire superstar.

I think you are prob right about that with the counter point being fair to say most would have said the same this spring if it was suggested they’d full-full supermax JB than add another long term $30M guy.

I’m not sure who publicly has the best handle on their spending but imo leaning just slightly high compared to consensus has been the sweet spot for a couple years now.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,477
And1: 21,416
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#451 » by Hal14 » Mon Jul 31, 2023 12:38 am

Read on Twitter
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#452 » by zoyathedestroya » Mon Jul 31, 2023 12:44 am

165bows wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:
165bows wrote:I remember wondering early in the off-season if there would be a mid-season Brogdon for Jerami Grant based deal. Still seems possible if Portland bails on Lillard finally, Grant won’t have much purpose there.

I put it as highly unlikely. They’re not taking on more long-term salary when they’re about to pay two supermaxes. Unless maybe if it’s for a surefire superstar.

I think you are prob right about that with the counter point being fair to say most would have said the same this spring if it was suggested they’d full-full supermax JB than add another long term $30M guy.

I’m not sure who publicly has the best handle on their spending but imo leaning just slightly high compared to consensus has been the sweet spot for a couple years now.

Porzingis is our mid-term 30M guy right now. Before Porzingis, maybe someone like Grant (my guy was Markkanen) made sense.

I think it's one thing to add Lillard on top of the three stars we already have, but an overpaid fringe all-star may just be superfluous for our purposes. For the next couple of seasons, how much better are our chances of winning a title with Grant instead of Brogdon? Not even considering the positional overlap of Grant with Tatum/Porzingis/Horford.

EDIT: I also think White will be extended to that number or close to it maybe as soon as end of year.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,477
And1: 21,416
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#453 » by Hal14 » Mon Jul 31, 2023 12:49 am

Some of these guys could get waived....

Reggie Bullock
Usman Garuba
Victor Oladipo
Davis Bertans
Aaron Wiggins
Tyty Washington
Cedi Osman
Cam Payne
Khem Birch
Isaiah Joe
Daniel Theis
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
Dogen
RealGM
Posts: 15,900
And1: 12,930
Joined: Apr 23, 2004
Location: Hugonda
 

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#454 » by Dogen » Mon Jul 31, 2023 2:10 am

Hal14 wrote:Some of these guys could get waived....

Reggie Bullock
Usman Garuba
Victor Oladipo
Davis Bertans
Aaron Wiggins
Tyty Washington
Cedi Osman
Cam Payne
Khem Birch
Isaiah Joe
Daniel Theis


What is going on with Garuba? Already on his third team and could be on his way out. I really liked him in the draft and thought him slipping was a great pick up for Houston, but then again they had too many young players, so maybe he hasn't had a chance to develop.

He also looks a bit thicker than his draft year. Is he not keeping in shape? I'd love for him to get a chance with the Celtics this year.
:curse:
GoGreen
Analyst
Posts: 3,050
And1: 3,487
Joined: Jul 19, 2017
 

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#455 » by GoGreen » Mon Jul 31, 2023 2:47 am

I liked Garuba out of the draft too. Kid might not be NBA material?

At this point I don't think there's much anyone waived or in FA can do for us tbh. Roster wise this is it - for now.
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#456 » by zoyathedestroya » Mon Jul 31, 2023 2:56 am

Read on Twitter

Neither Jay on the list. Kristaps though! Jokic is a joke. KD can still ball. Sabonis was great for the Kings. Too bad he got manhandled in the offs.
User avatar
La Flame
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,462
And1: 2,181
Joined: Jun 21, 2017
 

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#457 » by La Flame » Mon Jul 31, 2023 8:26 am

ryan in Maine wrote:
La Flame wrote:
Dogen wrote:
So true. Send him and a second rounder to OKC for Usman Garuba and he'll feel more appreciated there amongst the 7'2" guys.


Cold :lol: I don't ever get the Kornet fascination though. Dude's a complete stiff

Underrating in action. Complete stiff? When has Kornet looked like a stiff?


Every time he steps on the court
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#458 » by zoyathedestroya » Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:57 am

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,129
And1: 98,298
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#459 » by zoyathedestroya » Mon Jul 31, 2023 11:22 am

Per Windhorst on their recent pod episode, Derrick White is eligible to be extended to 3 more years (on top of the 2 he still has) at just under 90M. Cs can offer as soon as September 30 up until October 23. Get that **** done, Brad. Hoping for less than that number of course.
User avatar
steefP2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,844
And1: 9,752
Joined: Apr 25, 2011
 

Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread 2023-24, part 10 and Counting . . . 

Post#460 » by steefP2 » Mon Jul 31, 2023 11:25 am

zoyathedestroya wrote:Per Windhorst on their recent pod episode, Derrick White is eligible to be extended to 3 more years (on top of the 2 he still has) at just under 90M. Cs can offer as soon as September 30 up until October 23. Get that **** done, Brad. Hoping for less than that number of course.



3/90 would be a good deal; not quit the steal it is now but still. Would be 18% of cap in year 1 of extension, then 17 and last year 15.5. Rough estimates ofc. He’ll be starting his age 33 season by the end of that extension but he was drafted the same class as Tatum so he doesn’t have quite the same miles on his body, as most 33’s would.

You really wanna extend him this summer before the breakout we all know is coming

Return to Boston Celtics