I still think they do better than thatzoyathedestroya wrote:
55 wins would tie a Stevens-era high.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
I still think they do better than thatzoyathedestroya wrote:
55 wins would tie a Stevens-era high.
KGboss wrote:I still think they do better than thatzoyathedestroya wrote:
55 wins would tie a Stevens-era high.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Parliament10 wrote:KGboss wrote:I still think they do better than thatzoyathedestroya wrote:
55 wins would tie a Stevens-era high.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Agreed. Winning this game, would keep us on pace to win 62 Games.
So 60 Games, is a reasonable hope.
hickfromfrenchlick wrote:Why did the "international" thread get locked?
Hayward is a big loss tho. All that success to start the year had a big piece to do with him.keevsnick1 wrote:So at the 20 game mark 3 guys have played all 20 games those being Tatum, Semi, Wanamaker. 3 guys have played 19 of 20 those are Kemba, Smart, GWill and 4 guys have played 17/18 of 20 those are Brown, Theis, RWill, Edwards. So really besides Hayward the Celtics have been fairly healthy.
KGboss wrote:Hayward is a big loss tho. All that success to start the year had a big piece to do with him.keevsnick1 wrote:So at the 20 game mark 3 guys have played all 20 games those being Tatum, Semi, Wanamaker. 3 guys have played 19 of 20 those are Kemba, Smart, GWill and 4 guys have played 17/18 of 20 those are Brown, Theis, RWill, Edwards. So really besides Hayward the Celtics have been fairly healthy.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
KGboss wrote:Brown doesnt need you to clean his jock strap for him
Captain_Caveman wrote:You are perfectly welcome to never read or respond to my posts ever again. I don't find you particularly knowledgeable or insightful from anything I have read to date.
Fencer reregistered wrote:So which Celtics could actually sing? Two examples come to mind, but after that I haven't a clue.
Oh yeah -- Shaq was a Celtic at one point and an attempted rapper at some others. Who else?
zoyathedestroya wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:So which Celtics could actually sing? Two examples come to mind, but after that I haven't a clue.
Oh yeah -- Shaq was a Celtic at one point and an attempted rapper at some others. Who else?
Dunno if they're any good...
During his appearance on WEEI.com’s 5 Out, ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski gave Celtics fans reason to think the wing would want to stick around.
“I’ve had no indication he’s been anything but really happy with being in Boston,” Woj said. “I think it’s a question of, I think, his health, what happens between now and the end of the year, and is there an ability to do a longer deal where he is? Or, he plays it out at that number.”
Another thing that could play in the Celtics’ favor: Hayward’s injury history.
“I think, normally, without the injuries, you would’ve expected he would’ve opted out and did a new deal that would’ve been worth more money,” Woj said on 5 Out. “But I think, because of his injuries, that dictates it a little bit.”
Ironic that what’s kept Hayward off the court is what could inevitably keep him in Boston.