ImageImageImage

Omer Asik Trade - Updated link pg.109

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,586
And1: 12,327
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#501 » by FlatearthZorro » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:38 pm

gocelts wrote:When you hear Houston asking for Milsap whos better than Green, you start getting back to earth that Houston isnt going to cough up Asik for peanuts.

The guy that intrigues me that's been brought up in all these scenerios is actually Hawes...it would be awesome to get him. I'd put together a package to Houston to make that work and let the Sixers have Asik...



Hawes is basically a slightly better version of Favs, who probably plays worse defense, why wouldn u want that?
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#502 » by FakeScreenName123 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:48 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
gocelts wrote:When you hear Houston asking for Milsap whos better than Green, you start getting back to earth that Houston isnt going to cough up Asik for peanuts.

The guy that intrigues me that's been brought up in all these scenerios is actually Hawes...it would be awesome to get him. I'd put together a package to Houston to make that work and let the Sixers have Asik...



Hawes is basically a slightly better version of Favs, who probably plays worse defense, why wouldn u want that?



Probably because Hawes is a proven, legitimate NBA commodity of the you know what-you're-getting variety on a 'cheap' deal. I love Fav, but there's a reason why he's getting paid 2 mil a year and playing ~15 mins.


All in all, I would totally be OK with trading Jeff Green for Asik. Asik is a top 5 defensive center in the league. Those guys are very rare and you don't often get a chance to nab one of those guys. We also get out of some long-term salary with Green's deal.

The one thing that I feel is a little unreported is that after Asik becomes a F.A in 18 months he immediately becomes a UFA with no rights what-so-ever being held onto him. He's gunna get paid $$$$ if his trajectory maintains it's current course.
CollegeToPros
Celtics Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 1,557
And1: 455
Joined: Jun 24, 2010
     

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#503 » by CollegeToPros » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:49 pm

Atlanta will likely get him. Their GM is a dumbass and will handover 1st round pick and millsap.

Bass, Lee, Brooks, and try to keep a 1st but if u have to include it, then Asik had better be part of the future and not a rental.
Celtics Fan. Trust Danny Ainge.

Banner 18 pursuit.

2017 Celtics Forum Mock Draft Champ!
SirTankalot
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 87
Joined: Nov 28, 2013

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#504 » by SirTankalot » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:12 pm

humblebum wrote:Green is a bit better than you give him credit for and Asik a bit worse. Green still has the ability to kick into a higher gear from time to time (and has shown a penchant for making big plays down the stretch of games) while Asik can't defend PF's out to three point line (with a ton of those types masquerading as 5's around the league) and offensively he's a dud.

Jeff is a good basketball player. Not great. And good small forwards are replaceable. Asik is not a PF so who cares. He is a center who defends centers and the rim. And his value as a defensive-center significantly outweighs what you perceive as his negative offensive contributions (which by the way aren't as terrible as you think - 10 PPG on 54% shooting in 30 mins last year). Centers who can alter shots at the rim without picking up fouls are incredibly valuable commodities in today's game and Asik is one of those guys.

it seems evident the Celtics organization feels the same based on multiple reports.

Who do you think leaked out that the Celtics would say "no way" to trading Green? Rockets are trying to leverage draft picks from Celtics and Ainge uses the media to build up Jeff's trade value.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#505 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:12 pm

Isn't Asik just a rich man's Kendrick Perkins? I would be against trading Jeff Green for him, and I assume Danny would feel the same way.
User avatar
GreenMachine
Head Coach
Posts: 6,416
And1: 998
Joined: Jun 05, 2003

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#506 » by GreenMachine » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:13 pm

humblebum wrote:
GreenMachine wrote:
humblebum wrote:Why are the Celtics necessarily avoiding the tax when it seems they're looking to contend? I would imagine that Asik would signal an all-in to win with this group for the next this and next season.

Also gotta think that this has something to do with keeping Rondo happy and willing to sign on that dotted line.


You are kidding right? We are obviously not trying to contend this year. Maybe next year and definitely the year after... and with the new repeater tax and other penalties for tax teams (no S&Ts etc) it will be easier to contend the next couple years if we DON'T go into the tax this year.


I understand the issues surrounding the repeater tax and why the owners will look to avoid it. My point is that the team could be in a position to contend in the weak East and it would be a shame if they came up short over this and next season because they came up short in terms of what they're willing to spend.

I don't want to get too far out ahead of this thing here but adding Rondo/Asik to what this team is doing now could put the Celtics in a position to be neck and neck with Miami and Indy.


With the new CBA it's not about what you are "willing" to spend... It's about spending prudently. It would be a true shame if we couldn't add that final piece next year or the year after because we foolishly went into tax land this year. Forget the tax... I'm equally concerned about the penalties.
Red2
RealGM
Posts: 14,665
And1: 4,588
Joined: Aug 04, 2003

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#507 » by Red2 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:25 pm

how does trading jeff green ( if that's the deal) for asik, make us better? who plays small forward for us? All you do there is trade one hole for another.
"Now, there's a steal by Bird..!"
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#508 » by sully00 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:31 pm

FakeScreenName123 wrote:The one thing that I feel is a little unreported is that after Asik becomes a F.A in 18 months he immediately becomes a UFA with no rights what-so-ever being held onto him. He's gunna get paid $$$$ if his trajectory maintains it's current course.


I am not sure I follow what you are saying here. Boston would have Asik's bird rights and he is already making 8.375 mil a year on the cap where do you think his salary is going? Every time someone reaches for a defensive center salary wise it goes bad. Your also vastly overrating his performance. He has a couple of decent years as a back up big and one good season as a starter and now is not performing at all. I like him but he is maybe a top 10 Center on the defensive side of the ball in a league where quite few teams don't even have Center.

Asik is getting paid roughly 10 mil this season he got paid 5 mil last season and will get 15 mil next season his actual cap number is the average of these 3 years.

PHI is not going to give up a pick for Asik they are looking to flip him to get a pick.

CLE makes me nervous they are clearly anti-tank and have a treasure chest of picks themselves. If they come with a deal built around Waiters and a pick for Green you have to wonder what Ainge decides to do. Still think Jeff just leaves too big of a hole in the line up but I am not really sure how much Ainge cares.
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#509 » by humblebum » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:32 pm

SirTankalot wrote:
humblebum wrote:Green is a bit better than you give him credit for and Asik a bit worse. Green still has the ability to kick into a higher gear from time to time (and has shown a penchant for making big plays down the stretch of games) while Asik can't defend PF's out to three point line (with a ton of those types masquerading as 5's around the league) and offensively he's a dud.

Jeff is a good basketball player. Not great. And good small forwards are replaceable. Asik is not a PF so who cares. He is a center who defends centers and the rim. And his value as a defensive-center significantly outweighs what you perceive as his negative offensive contributions (which by the way aren't as terrible as you think - 10 PPG on 54% shooting in 30 mins last year). Centers who can alter shots at the rim without picking up fouls are incredibly valuable commodities in today's game and Asik is one of those guys.

it seems evident the Celtics organization feels the same based on multiple reports.

Who do you think leaked out that the Celtics would say "no way" to trading Green? Rockets are trying to leverage draft picks from Celtics and Ainge uses the media to build up Jeff's trade value.


Asik can score on dunks. That's it. He has mediocre to poor hands and he can't shoot free throws. He's a liability at the end of games and likely wouldn't play in close games during the 4th quarter. What happens when you play the Heat and Asik has to play Bosh? He becomes a liability there because he can't defend in space. He's excellent around the rim on both ends and I love his physicality but he, like Green, is far from a great player.

Green for all his flaws plays a crucial position in today's NBA. Look at the top players on the top teams and nearly all of them play the 3 or perimeter 4. That's the evolution of the game. You have 6'8" guys playing like shooting guards. Jeff Green gives you vital production and solid defense at the spot. Throw in his ability to have big scorig nights and his clutch ability and it becomes quite clear why he's not likely to included in a deal for Asik.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,395
And1: 70,124
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#510 » by Celts17Pride » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:33 pm

Red2 wrote:how does trading jeff green ( if that's the deal) for asik, make us better?

It doesn't. That's why it won't happen.
SirTankalot
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 87
Joined: Nov 28, 2013

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#511 » by SirTankalot » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:36 pm

Red2 wrote:All you do there is trade one hole for another.

Not all holes are equal and you have to prioritize when filling them. Sometimes when you have an opportunity to fill a hole that is hard to find, you just have to make it happen. You might be in a tight spot for awhile and it might get a little messy but it's worth it.
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#512 » by FakeScreenName123 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:42 pm

sully00 wrote:I am not sure I follow what you are saying here.


I guess what I am trying to say is, the Celtics would not have the option to extend Asik because under the new CBA any deals <4 years you cannot extend. So he would become a UFA in 18 months no matter what.

sully00 wrote: He has a couple of decent years as a back up big and one good season as a starter and now is not performing at all. I like him but he is maybe a top 10 Center on the defensive side of the ball in a league where quite few teams don't even have Center.



If I say he's a top 5 defensive center (let's say no.5) and you say he's top 10 (let's say no.10) I don't see how I'm vastly overrating him. Also, maybe you're wrong? Maybe I'm wrong? Truth is probably somewhere in between.

You use "backup" like a negative, but put into context with the teams he's been on, his stats and his usage in that small time frame stand out even more. That's why some people (hi!) were O.K with his contract when he got it when he was just a "backup" because his stats/usage would translate as a starter. And they did.

I know as a Celtic fan, we absolutely loved Perk for those few years. We defended him against other people who pointed to his stats because his stats sucked, but because we're good fans we knew/know how much value he brought. Imagine a Perk on steroids who is athletically competent and can catch the ball and that's what Asik is. We're going to love him if he is on this team.

Most importantly, If you also gave me a list of players who would pair perfectly with Sullinger, there's not many better options than Asik... given price, availability and age.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#513 » by Captain_Caveman » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:54 pm

sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#514 » by sully00 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:57 pm

FakeScreenName123 wrote:
sully00 wrote:I am not sure I follow what you are saying here.


I guess what I am trying to say is, the Celtics would not have the option to extend Asik because under the new CBA any deals <4 years you cannot extend. So he would become a UFA in 18 months no matter what.

sully00 wrote: He has a couple of decent years as a back up big and one good season as a starter and now is not performing at all. I like him but he is maybe a top 10 Center on the defensive side of the ball in a league where quite few teams don't even have Center.



If I say he's a top 5 defensive center (let's say no.5) and you say he's top 10 (let's say no.10) I don't see how I'm vastly overrating him. Also, maybe you're wrong? Maybe I'm wrong? Truth is probably somewhere in between.

You use "backup" like a negative, but put into context with the teams he's been on, his stats and his usage in that small time frame stand out even more. That's why some people (hi!) were O.K with his contract when he got it when he was just a "backup" because his stats/usage would translate as a starter. And they did.

I know as a Celtic fan, we absolutely loved Perk for those few years. We defended him against other people who pointed to his stats because his stats sucked, but because we're good fans we knew/know how much value he brought. Imagine a Perk on steroids who is athletically competent and can catch the ball and that's what Asik is. We're going to love him if he is on this team.

Most importantly, If you also gave me a list of players who would pair perfectly with Sullinger, there's not many better options than Asik... given price, availability and age.


Okay but veteran extensions are going to be extremely rare under the new CBA. Why would he take a 3 year deal this off season instead of a 5 year deal next off season even if he could be extended?

I like Asik the player I am simply saying this is not a guy teams are clearing cap space for in a year. He is already making 8 and change sure it might go to 10 or 11 on his next deal if he plays well but right now he isn't do anything for his value and he will be 29 at the start of his next deal.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#515 » by Captain_Caveman » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:06 pm

SirTankalot wrote:Not all holes are equal and you have to prioritize when filling them. Sometimes when you have an opportunity to fill a hole that is hard to find, you just have to make it happen. You might be in a tight spot for awhile and it might get a little messy but it's worth it.


LOL
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,739
And1: 20,103
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#516 » by Ben-N1ce » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:12 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
SirTankalot wrote:Not all holes are equal and you have to prioritize when filling them. Sometimes when you have an opportunity to fill a hole that is hard to find, you just have to make it happen. You might be in a tight spot for awhile and it might get a little messy but it's worth it.


LOL


:D
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#517 » by klemen4 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:16 pm

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,172
And1: 15,037
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#518 » by 165bows » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:18 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:Latest from Bulpett:

http://bostonherald.com/sports/celtics_ ... es_for_now


This quote was awesome:

So there was more logic than substance when a general manager told us, “It looks like Danny (Ainge) doesn’t want anything to happen in the league until he gets a chance to see if he can find something in it for Boston. I think he’s got his fingers in a lot of pies.”


I could definitely see Ainge just gumming up the works with a bunch of these trade scenarios until it comes out his way. :lol:
User avatar
ryaningf
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,671
And1: 2,738
Joined: Jul 13, 2003
     

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#519 » by ryaningf » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:26 pm

SirTankalot wrote:
Red2 wrote:All you do there is trade one hole for another.

Not all holes are equal and you have to prioritize when filling them. Sometimes when you have an opportunity to fill a hole that is hard to find, you just have to make it happen. You might be in a tight spot for awhile and it might get a little messy but it's worth it.


Seems DA's on the same wavelength.

“It looks like Danny (Ainge) doesn’t want anything to happen in the league until he gets a chance to see if he can find something in it for Boston. I think he’s got his fingers in a lot of pies.”
The leaks are real...the news is fake.

I'm just here for the memes.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Omer Asik Trade 

Post#520 » by Valid » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:57 pm

SirTankalot wrote:
klemen4 wrote:- Cleveland is out cause they are not getting Green

Enough with Jeff Green. He is a nice player. He is a solid player. He is not a player you build around as top-3 guy. He has a 15.41 PER and ranks 14th among starting SFs. That makes him league average. He is a solid defender, not a great one. Celtics have a chance to acquire a premier defensive center for an average SF and average PF without giving up any picks.

A "premier" defensive center who can't defend stretch bigs, can't play offense worth a lick, who is a prime Hack-a-Shaq candidate at the end of games and is already 27 years old (meaning he doesn't have much more room to grow) and overpaid?

Yeah! Let's trade Green for him even though the Celtics struggle offensively as it is! Sign me up!!!

Return to Boston Celtics