sully00 wrote:I am not sure I follow what you are saying here.
I guess what I am trying to say is, the Celtics would not have the option to extend Asik because under the new CBA any deals <4 years you cannot extend. So he would become a UFA in 18 months no matter what.
sully00 wrote: He has a couple of decent years as a back up big and one good season as a starter and now is not performing at all. I like him but he is maybe a top 10 Center on the defensive side of the ball in a league where quite few teams don't even have Center.
If I say he's a top 5 defensive center (let's say no.5) and you say he's top 10 (let's say no.10) I don't see how I'm
vastly overrating him. Also, maybe you're wrong? Maybe I'm wrong? Truth is probably somewhere in between.
You use "backup" like a negative, but put into context with the teams he's been on, his stats and his usage in that small time frame stand out even more. That's why some people (hi!) were O.K with his contract when he got it when he was just a "backup" because his stats/usage would translate as a starter. And they did.
I know as a Celtic fan, we absolutely loved Perk for those few years. We defended him against other people who pointed to his stats because his stats sucked, but because we're good fans we knew/know how much value he brought. Imagine a Perk on steroids who is athletically competent and can catch the ball and that's what Asik is. We're going to love him if he is on this team.
Most importantly, If you also gave me a list of players who would pair perfectly with Sullinger, there's not many better options than Asik... given price, availability and age.