truth18 wrote:Wtf is this hate on crazy hair? Y'all balding?
Watch the vid kid
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
truth18 wrote:Wtf is this hate on crazy hair? Y'all balding?
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:way to make analytics and management into a race issue ESPN....
Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.
Brad Turner of the Los Angeles Times:
Clippers reserve center Cole Aldrich will opt out of his contract that will pay him $1.2 million next season, per source.
— Brad Turner (@BA_Turner) June 2, 2016
The Clippers have Aldrich’s Non-Bird rights, which allow them to exceed the cap to sign Aldrich to up to 120% of the minimum salary. That won’t get it done. The Clippers – who are expected to stay over the cap – could also offer the mid-level exception. But even if they remain below the apron and offer the $5,628,000 non-taxpayer mid-level exception, I’d be shocked if that’s be enough.
Aldrich proved himself one of the NBA’s better backup centers last season. He’s mobile enough and does what limited big men do – rebound, protect the paint and foul too much. His scoring near the basket really improved playing in a better offense, too.
Curmudgeon wrote:My #1 trade target would be Kawhi Leonard. Bird isn't going to trade Paul George, and Butler isn't worth anything close to the packages rumored to have been offered.
The Spurs, meanwhile are an old team that needs to retool with younger players. Boston offers Johnson, Bradley and all three of its 2016 first rounders for Leonard.
Murta wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:My #1 trade target would be Kawhi Leonard. Bird isn't going to trade Paul George, and Butler isn't worth anything close to the packages rumored to have been offered.
The Spurs, meanwhile are an old team that needs to retool with younger players. Boston offers Johnson, Bradley and all three of its 2016 first rounders for Leonard.
Spurs ain't trading Leonard for everything Celtics have + NFL expansion in San Antonio + Bill Belichick.
Curmudgeon wrote:He's their only tradeable asset and it's pretty obvious from the thrashing they took from OKC in the playoffs that they need to retool.
Murta wrote:Trading either of two stars on long-term deals is a pretty pointless move.
Curmudgeon wrote:Murta wrote:Trading either of two stars on long-term deals is a pretty pointless move.
No it isn't. Right now the Spurs are stuck in the mediocre middle, with no prospect of immediate improvement. Aldridge did not distinguish himself in the playoffs and is not getting any younger either. I suppose they could sign Conley (as is rumored) but do do that they must shed salary. Same with Horford, who basically duplicates Aldridge.
Popovich and Buford aren't stupid. They will take a brutally honest look at their roster and realize they must retool. And the only asset that will bring a large enough haul to retool quickly is Leonard.
Curmudgeon wrote:Murta wrote:Trading either of two stars on long-term deals is a pretty pointless move.
No it isn't. Right now the Spurs are stuck in the mediocre middle, with no prospect of immediate improvement. Aldridge did not distinguish himself in the playoffs and is not getting any younger either. I suppose they could sign Conley (as is rumored) but do do that they must shed salary. Same with Horford, who basically duplicates Aldridge.
Popovich and Buford aren't stupid. They will take a brutally honest look at their roster and realize they must retool. And the only asset that will bring a large enough haul to retool quickly is Leonard.
Slartibartfast wrote:Why on earth would they trade their not yet 25 year old best player to "retool"?
Slartibartfast wrote:
Why on earth would they trade their not yet 25 year old best player to "retool"?
Murta wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:My #1 trade target would be Kawhi Leonard. Bird isn't going to trade Paul George, and Butler isn't worth anything close to the packages rumored to have been offered.
The Spurs, meanwhile are an old team that needs to retool with younger players. Boston offers Johnson, Bradley and all three of its 2016 first rounders for Leonard.
Spurs ain't trading Leonard for everything Celtics have + NFL expansion in San Antonio + Bill Belichick.
Curmudgeon wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Why on earth would they trade their not yet 25 year old best player to "retool"?
Because no one wants Parker or Aldridge and players like Danny Green won't bring much of a return.
SA is in a very different position from Indiana. SA is bumping up against a 90M cap, which severely inhibits their flexibility to make personnel changes. Indiana payroll is $17M less. That's why Leonard is more likely to be moved than George.
Curmudgeon wrote:Murta wrote:Trading either of two stars on long-term deals is a pretty pointless move.
No it isn't. Right now the Spurs are stuck in the mediocre middle, with no prospect of immediate improvement. Aldridge did not distinguish himself in the playoffs and is not getting any younger either. I suppose they could sign Conley (as is rumored) but do do that they must shed salary. Same with Horford, who basically duplicates Aldridge.
Popovich and Buford aren't stupid. They will take a brutally honest look at their roster and realize they must retool. And the only asset that will bring a large enough haul to retool quickly is Leonard.