ImageImageImage

The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#541 » by Edug27 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:26 pm

reload141 wrote:I reckon any deal for Butler/George will be in the offseason... when both Chicago actually do a review and choose their direction going forward (sell off and tank or build around Jimmy) and Indiana ask PG13 to sign an extension to which he will either say yes or no.


Exactly. Also, it prevents Boston from overpaying. At the deadline, Indy and Chicago would do the deal assuming the Nets pick is in the 3 range. If it lands top overall and Danny isn't head over heels in love with Fultz or Ball, then you won't have to include the players you'd have to include at the deadline to make a deal work.

IT, Hayward and PG are 3 players who fit the system and 3 players who can all create their own shot. Imagine that... 3 players who can create a shot?
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,323
And1: 10,526
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#542 » by darrendaye » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:27 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:Wait, so is the 2017 BKN pick on the table for either Butler and George, based on what Ainge has been saying in the media?


Well, technically he said it's open to discussion, not that it is being offered.
Member of the following organizations:
YPSS: Yes, Pritchard Should Start
RWIT: Rebounding Wing Is a Thing
AAH: All About Hugo
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#543 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:28 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:Butler needs the ball in his hands offensively-- it's why he, Wade and Rondo didn't work out. I'm not sure it's much different here with IT. George is a much better off ball player and provides much better spacing.



The major difference in that equation is that IT can shoot and those guys can't. A lot of success this season seems to come from IT initially off-ball and doing work against an already scrambling D.

I think Butler may be the better fit simply because Crowder is better than AB if that makes sense.


Yes and no. Our bigs spacing and IT's shooting definitely differentiates the situation with Chicago, but I'm still not sure he's the best fit here.

He's shooting better this year, but you still attack Butler defensively by daring him to shoot. Having a defender sagging off Butler allows for him to help and rotate quicker when Isaiah drives. Butlers game may improve but IT would be negatively impacted.

George is a much better fit. He's a different class of a shooter and would help to further space the floor. He would accentuate IT, and likely improve himself with another first option.
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,323
And1: 10,526
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#544 » by darrendaye » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:29 pm

Edug27 wrote:
reload141 wrote:I reckon any deal for Butler/George will be in the offseason... when both Chicago actually do a review and choose their direction going forward (sell off and tank or build around Jimmy) and Indiana ask PG13 to sign an extension to which he will either say yes or no.


Exactly. Also, it prevents Boston from overpaying. At the deadline, Indy and Chicago would do the deal assuming the Nets pick is in the 3 range. If it lands top overall and Danny isn't head over heels in love with Fultz or Ball, then you won't have to include the players you'd have to include at the deadline to make a deal work.

IT, Hayward and PG are 3 players who fit the system and 3 players who can all create their own shot. Imagine that... 3 players who can create a shot?


Exactly. If they can get Hayward, perhaps the conversation shifts to PG with Horford being included in a 3 team trade scenario. It's been suggested for the past couple of years that George is best used at PF, though he apparently is balking at this point.
Member of the following organizations:
YPSS: Yes, Pritchard Should Start
RWIT: Rebounding Wing Is a Thing
AAH: All About Hugo
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,192
And1: 15,058
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#545 » by 165bows » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:29 pm

Edug27 wrote:
reload141 wrote:I reckon any deal for Butler/George will be in the offseason... when both Chicago actually do a review and choose their direction going forward (sell off and tank or build around Jimmy) and Indiana ask PG13 to sign an extension to which he will either say yes or no.


Exactly. Also, it prevents Boston from overpaying. At the deadline, Indy and Chicago would do the deal assuming the Nets pick is in the 3 range. If it lands top overall and Danny isn't head over heels in love with Fultz or Ball, then you won't have to include the players you'd have to include at the deadline to make a deal work.

IT, Hayward and PG are 3 players who fit the system and 3 players who can all create their own shot. Imagine that... 3 players who can create a shot?

It also makes crowder at the four much more feasible and effective. He's been great there at times, but when the other four guys with him are all hugely undersized it blows the whole thing up. Butler-Hayward-Crowder, it should go back to working again.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#546 » by ConstableGeneva » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:31 pm

I feel like we're not talking about Gallo enough.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#547 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:32 pm

reload141 wrote:I reckon any deal for Butler/George will be in the offseason... when both Chicago actually do a review and choose their direction going forward (sell off and tank or build around Jimmy) and Indiana ask PG13 to sign an extension to which he will either say yes or no.


PG already said he wouldn't commit to an extension. If Indy wants to maximize their return, it behooves them to deal him by the deadline.
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,432
And1: 28,006
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#548 » by Green89 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:33 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:I feel like we're not talking about Gallo enough.


I'm just not sure he's a Crowder upgrade. Crowder shoots a better percentage in both 2s and 3s, and their PERs are nearly identical. Crowder is better on defense. Both are somewhat injury prone with Gallo even worse than Jae. His 3 more PPG would probably even out if he came here and he'd get about the 14 Jae gets now.
Pacino62
Analyst
Posts: 3,133
And1: 2,436
Joined: Jun 26, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#549 » by Pacino62 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:35 pm

darrendaye wrote:
Pacino62 wrote:
Shamrock wrote:Just out of curiosity, how much better do people think Butler is then Hayward?


Quite a bit because of defense. However, IMO Hayward is far superior in offense and is a closer. Got to look at both ends though. Butler is in that second tier, while Hayward is one below.

Like em both.


And Butler is a tier below KG and likely PP too. Is Butler a Brown or Fultz + tier better?

This is my issue with trading for Butler now. He's closer to Ray Allen than KG. The Allen deal only made sense after Ainge knew he had an avenue to KG beforehand. Ainge already went second shoe first, signing Horford trying to lure KD. Let's not do it again. At least until you know what you are giving up. Can't want until this deadline passes. Usually eat this up, but, while I typically like Ainge's tactics in trades, I fear he might be too married to IT/Horford and do something rash.

Through back channels Ainge should have an idea whether he has a legit shot at Hayward by the draft.



Yep. Hence "the second tier" comment. No Brooklyn pics for Jimmy. Like I said, I like both players. Not comparing either to the likes of Pierce, KG or even George (who IMO is in that top tier).
“All due respect and I’m generally curious but who tf is cousin steez” ~ MagicBagley18

"i see celtics fans here are nothing but a s s holes so good bye not going to waste my time with you lowlifes." ~ HornetsFan29
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#550 » by Edug27 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:37 pm

darrendaye wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
reload141 wrote:I reckon any deal for Butler/George will be in the offseason... when both Chicago actually do a review and choose their direction going forward (sell off and tank or build around Jimmy) and Indiana ask PG13 to sign an extension to which he will either say yes or no.


Exactly. Also, it prevents Boston from overpaying. At the deadline, Indy and Chicago would do the deal assuming the Nets pick is in the 3 range. If it lands top overall and Danny isn't head over heels in love with Fultz or Ball, then you won't have to include the players you'd have to include at the deadline to make a deal work.

IT, Hayward and PG are 3 players who fit the system and 3 players who can all create their own shot. Imagine that... 3 players who can create a shot?


Exactly. If they can get Hayward, perhaps the conversation shifts to PG with Horford being included in a 3 team trade scenario. It's been suggested for the past couple of years that George is best used at PF, though he apparently is balking at this point.


I don't know about all of that. I think Horford is your ideal small ball 5. Plus it's bad business to trade away the one good free agent this franchise was able to sign after just a year. Too many assets on this team to have to include Horford.

- Sign Hayward
- Trade Fultz/Ball, and some combo of Rozier, Young, Crowder etc for George.
- Shop Avery.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#551 » by Homerclease » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm

Edug27 wrote:
darrendaye wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
Exactly. Also, it prevents Boston from overpaying. At the deadline, Indy and Chicago would do the deal assuming the Nets pick is in the 3 range. If it lands top overall and Danny isn't head over heels in love with Fultz or Ball, then you won't have to include the players you'd have to include at the deadline to make a deal work.

IT, Hayward and PG are 3 players who fit the system and 3 players who can all create their own shot. Imagine that... 3 players who can create a shot?


Exactly. If they can get Hayward, perhaps the conversation shifts to PG with Horford being included in a 3 team trade scenario. It's been suggested for the past couple of years that George is best used at PF, though he apparently is balking at this point.


I don't know about all of that. I think Horford is your ideal small ball 5. Plus it's bad business to trade away the one good free agent this franchise was able to sign after just a year. Too many assets on this team to have to include Horford.

- Sign Hayward
- Trade Fultz/Ball, and some combo of Rozier, Young, Crowder etc for George.
- Shop Avery.

This is the dream scenario.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#552 » by Edug27 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:40 pm

Green89 wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:I feel like we're not talking about Gallo enough.


I'm just not sure he's a Crowder upgrade. Crowder shoots a better percentage in both 2s and 3s, and their PERs are nearly identical. Crowder is better on defense. Both are somewhat injury prone with Gallo even worse than Jae. His 3 more PPG would probably even out if he came here and he'd get about the 14 Jae gets now.


All Crowder does is stand there and chuck 3's. he's streaky. He doesn't really provide much more offensively, and his defense is a bit overrated. Gallo (who I don't even want btw) provides so much more to the team than Crowder. It goes wayyyy beyond shooting % numbers. He can create. He can pass. He can drive. Add a different dimension to the team. Also, Gallos shooting numbers and efficiency would be better playing in our system... just as Crowder probably wouldn't have all the open looks playing in Denver.
reload141
RealGM
Posts: 11,790
And1: 23,453
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#553 » by reload141 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:42 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
darrendaye wrote:
Exactly. If they can get Hayward, perhaps the conversation shifts to PG with Horford being included in a 3 team trade scenario. It's been suggested for the past couple of years that George is best used at PF, though he apparently is balking at this point.


I don't know about all of that. I think Horford is your ideal small ball 5. Plus it's bad business to trade away the one good free agent this franchise was able to sign after just a year. Too many assets on this team to have to include Horford.

- Sign Hayward
- Trade Fultz/Ball, and some combo of Rozier, Young, Crowder etc for George.
- Shop Avery.

This is the dream scenario.


Agreed. Pairing George & Hayward with IT & Horford is ideal... I fully trust in Zizic and/or a Vet Min big man helping down low... we need ELITE wings and while I love Bradley (we can't be the ones to pay him) and Crowder (amazing year on such a cheap contract it's ridiculous) we can't win a title with non-elite wings.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#554 » by ConstableGeneva » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:43 pm

Green89 wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:I feel like we're not talking about Gallo enough.


I'm just not sure he's a Crowder upgrade. Crowder shoots a better percentage in both 2s and 3s, and their PERs are nearly identical. Crowder is better on defense. Both are somewhat injury prone with Gallo even worse than Jae. His 3 more PPG would probably even out if he came here and he'd get about the 14 Jae gets now.

Wow, someone bit. I was half-kidding. I was just wondering since he was among the names mentioned in the Bulpett article. Isn't he considered a "rental" or is Ainge willing to sign him in the offseason if Hayward/Griffin fell through?

He's an upgrade to Jerebko in staggered bench lineups and also an upgrade offensively (can create his own shot) from both Bradley and Crowder in crunch time lineups. He and Crowder could switch as SF/PF in the starting lineup if Stevens decides to just double down on the all-offense, no rebounding thing (think Ariza/Anderson in Houston except they're a much better rebounding team).
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#555 » by Edug27 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:43 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
darrendaye wrote:
Exactly. If they can get Hayward, perhaps the conversation shifts to PG with Horford being included in a 3 team trade scenario. It's been suggested for the past couple of years that George is best used at PF, though he apparently is balking at this point.


I don't know about all of that. I think Horford is your ideal small ball 5. Plus it's bad business to trade away the one good free agent this franchise was able to sign after just a year. Too many assets on this team to have to include Horford.

- Sign Hayward
- Trade Fultz/Ball, and some combo of Rozier, Young, Crowder etc for George.
- Shop Avery.

This is the dream scenario.


Not to get ahead of myself, but let's say all of this does happen. And next season an all star big man becomes available.. Does another team have a better possible package of Nets18 and Brown?
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 69,098
And1: 71,367
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#556 » by Celts17Pride » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:45 pm

Green89 wrote:
CrowderKeg wrote:I feel like we're not talking about Gallo enough.


I'm just not sure he's a Crowder upgrade. Crowder shoots a better percentage in both 2s and 3s, and their PERs are nearly identical. Crowder is better on defense. Both are somewhat injury prone with Gallo even worse than Jae. His 3 more PPG would probably even out if he came here and he'd get about the 14 Jae gets now.

If the Celtics do get Gallo he would not be taking Crowder's spot. Gallo would be taking Jerebko's slot along side KO
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#557 » by ConstableGeneva » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:45 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
darrendaye wrote:
Exactly. If they can get Hayward, perhaps the conversation shifts to PG with Horford being included in a 3 team trade scenario. It's been suggested for the past couple of years that George is best used at PF, though he apparently is balking at this point.


I don't know about all of that. I think Horford is your ideal small ball 5. Plus it's bad business to trade away the one good free agent this franchise was able to sign after just a year. Too many assets on this team to have to include Horford.

- Sign Hayward
- Trade Fultz/Ball, and some combo of Rozier, Young, Crowder etc for George.
- Shop Avery.

This is the dream scenario.

I thought dream scenario was the second line to be trade for Anthony Davis. Maybe just my dream.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#558 » by Edug27 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:46 pm

CrowderKeg wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
I don't know about all of that. I think Horford is your ideal small ball 5. Plus it's bad business to trade away the one good free agent this franchise was able to sign after just a year. Too many assets on this team to have to include Horford.

- Sign Hayward
- Trade Fultz/Ball, and some combo of Rozier, Young, Crowder etc for George.
- Shop Avery.

This is the dream scenario.

I thought dream scenario was the second line to be trade for Anthony Davis. Maybe just my dream.


**Realistic dreams

If you're talking fantasy, I'd rather have Lebron than AD.
jirrit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,169
And1: 4,663
Joined: Mar 01, 2011
Location: Belgium

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#559 » by jirrit » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:47 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:
London2Boston wrote:Doubt Either one joins, but who would you guys prefer out of PG or Butler? I'm torn.


It's very close for me right now. I have Butler slightly ahead because I think he is currently better and has the additional year on his contract, but George shoots better, is half a year younger, and is longer so I expect him to age more gracefully. Will ultimately come down to price.

They both seem to be sulking this season, but it's notable to me how it seems that Butler is playing better despite it.


Position wise there's also a difference, no? SG-SF vs SF-small ball PF or am I wrong?
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,165
And1: 14,719
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#560 » by Marvel » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:54 pm

Would the BKN 17, Smart, Crowder be too much for PG/Jimmy?

Return to Boston Celtics