Hal14 wrote:
Minus the Houston game he’s been good from 3 since his 0-fer slump too. Granted only a 4 game sample size, but his confidence looks better on them and he’s not leaning back like many noticed during the cold spell.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Hal14 wrote:
Bostondave wrote:Not a fan of D White. I can see some things he could do, that he does in brief flashes. But his game is too passive, too tentative. Which fits right into the "net rating". He's always looiking just to do nothing bad or wrong, ever.
Didn't escape my attention that nobody attempted to explain how this "net rationg" makes for an "impactful" player also.
Bostondave wrote:Not that interested in the defiintion of "net rating". Have been asking how it makes for an "impactful" player. D White, nor other of his fellow highly rated "net rating" fellows make much of a noticeable "impact" on their teams or the game from what I can see. Certainly not D White who plays soft, tentative and scared for the most part. With some small flashes of aggression. I'll give him props for his D. But not much else from him. He's tentative. Looks to do no harm. Just think what his "net rating" would be if he were more assertive on O and kept the same D.
Bostondave wrote:Not a fan of D White. I can see some things he could do, that he does in brief flashes. But his game is too passive, too tentative. Which fits right into the "net rating". He's always looiking just to do nothing bad or wrong, ever.
Didn't escape my attention that nobody attempted to explain how this "net rationg" makes for an "impactful" player also.
Bostondave wrote:Not that interested in the defiintion of "net rating". Have been asking how it makes for an "impactful" player. D White, nor other of his fellow highly rated "net rating" fellows make much of a noticeable "impact" on their teams or the game from what I can see. Certainly not D White who plays soft, tentative and scared for the most part. With some small flashes of aggression. I'll give him props for his D. But not much else from him. He's tentative. Looks to do no harm. Just think what his "net rating" would be if he were more assertive on O and kept the same D.

Bostondave wrote:Not that interested in the defiintion of "net rating". Have been asking how it makes for an "impactful" player. D White, nor other of his fellow highly rated "net rating" fellows make much of a noticeable "impact" on their teams or the game from what I can see. Certainly not D White who plays soft, tentative and scared for the most part. With some small flashes of aggression. I'll give him props for his D. But not much else from him. He's tentative. Looks to do no harm. Just think what his "net rating" would be if he were more assertive on O and kept the same D.


zoyathedestroya wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:Tentative White up to first among NBA guards in total blocks.

zoyathedestroya wrote:Halfway thru the season, DWhite’s current block percentage is 3.0%. DWade, considered among the best shotblocking guards of all-time, eclipsed that only once in his career (2011-12).
EDIT: Jrue Holiday, one of the best active shotblocking guards, has never reached 2.0% block percentage.
Dogen wrote:Celtics win despite Smart having -1 points for the game.