ImageImageImage

Trade Landscape/Trade Ideas

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Devilanche
General Manager
Posts: 7,799
And1: 2,472
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#61 » by Devilanche » Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:45 pm

De Colo or Mills + Bonner for Bass?
Get you guy another PG while getting out of Bass contract for next year?
Bonner could probably be bought out at deadline or traded then.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.


meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,371
And1: 70,078
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#62 » by Celts17Pride » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:44 pm

No one on this team is untouchable. Everyone could be moved including Rondo, Bradley, Sully, Green etc. Ainge has to decide if he has any "keepers" on this team.

This season is a sham. Ainge giving people lip service just to sell tickets. The quicker the 2013-2014 season is over the better. Such a farce and a sham.

Bring on the 2014-2015 season!
achimho
Junior
Posts: 284
And1: 344
Joined: Apr 14, 2012
   

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#63 » by achimho » Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:11 pm

Boozer (PF, 2yrs/32M), Deng (SF, 1yr/14.3M) and Marquis Teague (PG, rookie deal) and our 2nd for
Wallace, Bass, Lee, Green, your 1st and 2016 Brooklyn 1st?
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#64 » by Slartibartfast » Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:51 pm

achimho wrote:Boozer (PF, 2yrs/32M), Deng (SF, 1yr/14.3M) and Marquis Teague (PG, rookie deal) and our 2nd for
Wallace, Bass, Lee, Green, your 1st and 2016 Brooklyn 1st?


Weird trade, man. That's a ton of money changing hands and a ton of uncertainty with those picks.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,162
And1: 15,025
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#65 » by 165bows » Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:30 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
achimho wrote:Boozer (PF, 2yrs/32M), Deng (SF, 1yr/14.3M) and Marquis Teague (PG, rookie deal) and our 2nd for
Wallace, Bass, Lee, Green, your 1st and 2016 Brooklyn 1st?


Weird trade, man. That's a ton of money changing hands and a ton of uncertainty with those picks.


:lol:

What is this, 2010? Maybe LeBron will opt out and sign here.
achimho
Junior
Posts: 284
And1: 344
Joined: Apr 14, 2012
   

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#66 » by achimho » Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:12 pm

I feel like the Bulls FO has to do something.
Deng wants to test FA and might demand too much, Boozer might get amnestied to bring over Mirotic for MLE.
So in my mind a nice thing to do would be trading both, get a replacement for Deng in Green.
Gibson would start a year earlier and Bass or Green (depending on the rotation) could back him up.
Lee and Wallace improve bench depth for a playoff run.

By doing this we take off a year of each bad contract.

Dream scenario prior to next draft would be to throw Bass (expiring by then), Lee and as many picks (CHI/CHA/BOS 1st) as needed to a top 5-6 drafting team with cap space (like Jazz, 76ers, Suns) and secure one of the top draft prospects.

I like playing around some scenarios in my head :D
soxfan2003
RealGM
Posts: 11,944
And1: 4,257
Joined: May 30, 2003
   

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#67 » by soxfan2003 » Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:51 am

achimho wrote:Boozer (PF, 2yrs/32M), Deng (SF, 1yr/14.3M) and Marquis Teague (PG, rookie deal) and our 2nd for
Wallace, Bass, Lee, Green, your 1st and 2016 Brooklyn 1st?


I'm someone who wants the Celtics to have a top 3 pick this year so I wouldn't even consider such a deal with the Celtics 2014 pick included and perhaps the best pick the Celtics got from Brooklyn also included.

I do think a trade of Green to the Bulls, Deng to some other team and a draft pick and bad player with 1-2 years left on his contract to the Celtics makes some sense for Chicago and Boston. Green may be a slightly younger/more affordable Deng replacement without a lot of miles on his knees etc. Chicago can then invest money elsewhere.

With Sullinger and Olynyk already on the roster, I just don't see Boozer being young enough to stunt the growth of 3 players who will probably never be as good as young Boozer but are at least worth investing in.
CelticsBizniss
Freshman
Posts: 55
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 30, 2013

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#68 » by CelticsBizniss » Tue Oct 22, 2013 6:52 am

I'd love to see us target Aldridge and Horford if we can't get Wiggens

For Horford and Wes Matthews
The better of Olynyk/Sullinger at the time. Brooklyn's three picks, Avery, and Lee

For Aldridge
Our top 5 pick, the worse of Olynyk/Sullinger and Gerald Wallace. Clippers 2015

Celtics:
Rondo/Matthews/Green/Aldridge/Horford
Vet/Crawford/MLE/Bass/ResignedHumphries or something

Blazers get a PF to replace Aldridge in the short term and a top 5 pick
Hawks get a PF to replace Horford, three nice looking picks, and Avery Bradley
User avatar
ryaningf
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,671
And1: 2,738
Joined: Jul 13, 2003
     

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#69 » by ryaningf » Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:52 pm

Zach Lowe thinks Faried might be available, among other things:

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9860683/32-bold-predictions-2013-14-nba-season

We've got too many PFs as it is but I'd move heaven and earth to get my hands on Faried.
The leaks are real...the news is fake.

I'm just here for the memes.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#70 » by Valid » Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:33 pm

ryaningf wrote:Zach Lowe thinks Faried might be available, among other things:

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9860683/32-bold-predictions-2013-14-nba-season

We've got too many PFs as it is but I'd move heaven and earth to get my hands on Faried.

I guess Denver feels with McGee and Hickson up front, they can afford to move Faried. I still think it'd be silly for them do so, though. That being said, I don't see us being able to put together any sort of package for him that makes sense for both sides.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#71 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:39 pm

ryaningf wrote:Zach Lowe thinks Faried might be available, among other things:

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9860683/32-bold-predictions-2013-14-nba-season

We've got too many PFs as it is but I'd move heaven and earth to get my hands on Faried.


I was a big Faried booster in college, but I think his gaudy stats in the NBA have inflated his reputation/value. I think he's a very nice 3rd big to have in your rotation - great rebounder in space (though surprisingly poor at boxing out), excellent transition weapon with his hustle and athleticism and a good possession creator overall. But he's a poor defensive player and a very limited offensive player.

It would be all kinds of fun watching him play with Rondo, but he's not a building block in any way.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,162
And1: 15,025
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#72 » by 165bows » Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:44 pm

ryaningf wrote:Zach Lowe thinks Faried might be available, among other things:

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9860683/32-bold-predictions-2013-14-nba-season

We've got too many PFs as it is but I'd move heaven and earth to get my hands on Faried.


Fun article, thanks for posting.

Lowe reiterates his belief that the Celtics will trade out of any competitive scenario that may arise.

12. Boston Will Trade Itself Down the Standings

Reality has set in for Boston fans after Gerald Wallace's rant about effort over the weekend and a listless preseason overall. This is what an NBA offense looks like when every player on a team (save Rondo) tops out as "third option on a contender."

But Boston will defend, despite a glaring lack of rim protection, and it will scrap its way to enough wins that eighth-seed dreams might seem plausible after 20 games. The Celtics wouldn't mind their young guys getting to experience meaningful late-season games, but the guess here is that the front office would rather have at least one very nice first-round pick in a loaded draft. In other words, look for everyone to be on the table. Bass might be the most tradable guy, since he's a solid player with just one year left on his contract after this season. But bigger names will come up. Jeff Green has fans around the league, and Rondo's contract expires after next season. He has to prove his health again, but I've never gotten the impression Boston would be stoked to pay Rondo a max (or near-max) deal after 2015.


Also thought this was interesting about the various title contenders...

32. This Season Is Going to Be a Ton of Fun

I went into last season absolutely sure Miami would win the title, and I felt even more strongly when the playoffs opened. This season? I've no clue. It feels like the first time since the start of 2011-12 that I might take the field over the Heat. The Eastern Conference is better at the top, and whichever team survives the Western Conference — the equivalent to beating four video-game bosses in a row — will be a powerhouse. And we've no clue which team that will be. You could select any of San Antonio, Oklahoma City, Memphis, Houston, and the Clippers and I wouldn't object. Heck, you could predict another mega-leap for Golden State and I wouldn't think you were nuts.

The title feels more truly in play than it has been in a while. That unpredictability, plus what should be a fun trade market, will make this season a doozy. One more week …
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#73 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:30 pm

If Bass is our most trade-able guy, how is he still on this team? My goodness he needs to go.

Problem is I don't think he's all that trade-able. How many half-decent back-up 4s are pulling down $6.5 mil per? Speights, Hansbrough, Diaw, Scola, Arthur... those are market rates for journeyman back-up 4s. Bass is well overpaid.

The only trade I can think of is to Miami for Joel Anthony and James Jones - saves us some money, gives us a mediocre rim protector and clears up some of the logjam at the 4. Miami could use a 4 with quickness and a mid-range J - Haslem's J has been broke the last few years.
Havlicek17
Pro Prospect
Posts: 829
And1: 171
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Location: Savannah, GA

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#74 » by Havlicek17 » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:03 am

Courtesy of Grantland:

23. If Eric Gordon Stays Healthy and Plays Well, the Pelicans Will Look to Trade Him

New Orleans has said all the right things about Gordon: He loves it here! He's a nice guy! He doesn't really pout that much! He shows new players around the city! We totally believe Tyreke Evans can play a ton of minutes at small forward! I'm not quite buying it, given the Evans signing, and the fact that the Gordon-Davis-Evans–Jrue Holiday–Ryan Anderson core has these guys basically capped out through 2015-16.

Gordon's deal is toxic now, but it doesn't have to be if he's healthy. He has only two seasons left after this one, and the final year on the contract is Gordon's option. And max deals for guys coming off rookie contracts aren't as damaging as a $20 million cap-clogger gone bad.

Gordon inspires a ton of curious talk in rival front offices. He's not yet 25, with an impressive skill set and a disastrously bad health history. If he plays well and stays in the lineup, the Pellies might get someone to bite.
********************
That someone might be the Celtics...

The Pelican's need a starting SF and Center so Davis can play PF.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,342
And1: 13,186
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#75 » by brackdan70 » Wed Oct 23, 2013 12:54 pm

Havlicek17 wrote:Courtesy of Grantland:

23. If Eric Gordon Stays Healthy and Plays Well, the Pelicans Will Look to Trade Him

New Orleans has said all the right things about Gordon: He loves it here! He's a nice guy! He doesn't really pout that much! He shows new players around the city! We totally believe Tyreke Evans can play a ton of minutes at small forward! I'm not quite buying it, given the Evans signing, and the fact that the Gordon-Davis-Evans–Jrue Holiday–Ryan Anderson core has these guys basically capped out through 2015-16.

Gordon's deal is toxic now, but it doesn't have to be if he's healthy. He has only two seasons left after this one, and the final year on the contract is Gordon's option. And max deals for guys coming off rookie contracts aren't as damaging as a $20 million cap-clogger gone bad.

Gordon inspires a ton of curious talk in rival front offices. He's not yet 25, with an impressive skill set and a disastrously bad health history. If he plays well and stays in the lineup, the Pellies might get someone to bite.
********************
That someone might be the Celtics...

The Pelican's need a starting SF and Center so Davis can play PF.


Green and Bass for Gordon? or are hoping the would take Wallace.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Havlicek17
Pro Prospect
Posts: 829
And1: 171
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Location: Savannah, GA

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#76 » by Havlicek17 » Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:00 pm

Earlier in this thread I suggested a trade with Wallace. Wallace's contract is for 3 years at around $10 Mil/season. The Grantland article says that Gordon's contract is toxic to NO. They have a log jam at the 2 spot, desperately need a starting quality SF, and Gordon's contract is for 3 years at ~$14 Mil/season.

In the first half of the season, I believe Wallace will prove to be one of the better starting caliber SF's in the league, and in a contract swap for Gordon, saves NO ~$14 Mil over the next 3 years.

Of course, we'd have to throw someone else into the trade to make the numbers work, but that extra player would likely either fill another hole (like Vitor would do for their Center position) or be shorter term like an expiring this season (maybe Crawford).
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#77 » by Andrew McCeltic » Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:35 pm

I think Green for Gordon is more likely- they could use a young small forward to grow with their core. Don't know if they're fans of him, but wasn't Rondo/Green for CP the rumor a couple of years ago?

I think Wallace will see a resurgence, but he doesn't fit a lot of teams because of his offensive liabilities..

And I'm not sure Eric Gordon is a great fit here.. he's a huge question mark because of his contract. I would think about Humphries/Bradley for Gordon, or even Humphries/Crawford.

The more I've thought about it, the best thing we can do is trade one of our wings for a big man. Could be Bass/Lee for Asik, or Green for Greg Monroe, or Bradley for Kanter. But we could use one more promising frontcourt prospect, and I'm not sure who we can get in the next draft.. Even if we don't build around Sullinger/Olynyk/Monroe, we'd have depth for trades.

Personally I want Parker and Exum out of the draft, two potentially elite offensive players.. Rondo and Exum or Bradley and Exum, Parker at the 3, Sullinger, Olynyk, Monroe and a ton of cap room is a great start.

We could also try to low-ball the Lakers on Gasol (like they did Memphis)- Green/Lee or Green/Bradley/Bass..
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#78 » by Slartibartfast » Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:25 pm

I think a healthy Gordon's a very strong fit with Rondo and Bradley in a 3-man backcourt rotation. Excellent shooter/secondary playmaker with Rondo + good ball-handler/decent passer to match with Bradley.
zronv7
Starter
Posts: 2,437
And1: 1,191
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#79 » by zronv7 » Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:39 pm

What would it take to get Gordon Hayward on the C's?
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Landscape 

Post#80 » by Andrew McCeltic » Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:05 pm

I don't think Hayward could be pried from Utah without giving up Rondo.. Maybe Eric Gordon..

And Gordon obviously pairs ok with RR/AB but it's a small and fragile backcourt without anyone who can get to and finish at the rim..


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile app

Return to Boston Celtics