Durins Baynes wrote:Well, I'm a simple man. I believe in what I can prove, or what makes logical sense, so unless people can present evidence of this claim I'm going to assume it is untrue.
So I assume you're already googling?
I'm out. Good luck.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts

Durins Baynes wrote:Well, I'm a simple man. I believe in what I can prove, or what makes logical sense, so unless people can present evidence of this claim I'm going to assume it is untrue.
Durins Baynes wrote:People have already made my point for me. What Lebron said is pretty reasonable. Guys ripped on Ray for leaving, even though the Celtics were the ones who wouldn't show Ray any loyalty. I'm also not sure the Celtics were really still a real shot for the title when Ray booked, though of course they weren't rebuilding like they are now. KG could have retired or suffered through it, but like most players he did what was best for him. And so did Ray (and in retrospect it worked for him).
Durins Baynes wrote:For all you know I am a Celtic fan. Strictly speaking Celtic interests are best served by Doc staying on the Celtics, and not coaching a rival team into the future. I'm not sure how helping Brooklyn really serves Celtic interests, given the fairly modest return obtained for them in a trade. Lastly, OJ Mayo is not any sort of upgrade on Ray Allen. Mayo has already proven he doesn't belong on a winning team. I think a lot of Celtic fans are disappointed with sending off Pierce, KG and Doc, and the decision not to pay more to keep Allen. You could easily have tanked this year with KG and Pierce playing every 2nd game in limited minutes (and with other moves designed to artificially lower the win total). Pierce especially clearly didn't want to go elsewhere. Personally of course, I'd have traded them, or KG at least, because this is a business. But if it's a business, you can't fault Ray for leaving either. It's pretty obvious which way the wind was blowing. The Celtics wanted to replace him with Bradley, and were heading towards a rebuild. He just got out a year early.
“I’m not commenting on any more teams or players,” James said before the start of Thursday’s preseason game against the Nets, when asked an innocuous question about the Nets' chances of contending for a title.
Durins Baynes wrote:For all you know I am a Celtic fan. Strictly speaking Celtic interests are best served by Doc staying on the Celtics, and not coaching a rival team into the future. I'm not sure how helping Brooklyn really serves Celtic interests, given the fairly modest return obtained for them in a trade. Lastly, OJ Mayo is not any sort of upgrade on Ray Allen. Mayo has already proven he doesn't belong on a winning team. I think a lot of Celtic fans are disappointed with sending off Pierce, KG and Doc, and the decision not to pay more to keep Allen. You could easily have tanked this year with KG and Pierce playing every 2nd game in limited minutes (and with other moves designed to artificially lower the win total). Pierce especially clearly didn't want to go elsewhere. Personally of course, I'd have traded them, or KG at least, because this is a business. But if it's a business, you can't fault Ray for leaving either. It's pretty obvious which way the wind was blowing. The Celtics wanted to replace him with Bradley, and were heading towards a rebuild. He just got out a year early.
You have to admit they've got point here. All they talked about was loyalty, and Garnett constantly talked about "bleeding green," and yet once the rats appeared to be bailing on the good ship Celtic, he and Pierce sailed off to Brooklyn, leaving Rajon Rondo alone to go down to the sea. And that's fine. You've got to look out for your career. But to blast Allen as publicly as they did and then turn around and bail, to a division rival, when things got tough, is not a great look.
The answer will be that Pierce and Garnett were traded, they didn't leave as free agents. But Garnett had to approve the trade to make it work, and Pierce has admitted to lobbying him to do so. It was obviously hard for them to leave Boston, but it was probably also hard for Allen to do the same.
Durins Baynes wrote:Well, I'm a simple man. I believe in what I can prove, or what makes logical sense, so unless people can present evidence of this claim I'm going to assume it is untrue.

Durins Baynes wrote:For all you know I am a Celtic fan. Strictly speaking Celtic interests are best served by Doc staying on the Celtics, and not coaching a rival team into the future. I'm not sure how helping Brooklyn really serves Celtic interests, given the fairly modest return obtained for them in a trade. Lastly, OJ Mayo is not any sort of upgrade on Ray Allen. Mayo has already proven he doesn't belong on a winning team. I think a lot of Celtic fans are disappointed with sending off Pierce, KG and Doc, and the decision not to pay more to keep Allen. You could easily have tanked this year with KG and Pierce playing every 2nd game in limited minutes (and with other moves designed to artificially lower the win total). Pierce especially clearly didn't want to go elsewhere. Personally of course, I'd have traded them, or KG at least, because this is a business. But if it's a business, you can't fault Ray for leaving either. It's pretty obvious which way the wind was blowing. The Celtics wanted to replace him with Bradley, and were heading towards a rebuild. He just got out a year early.
Fiktion wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/rodboone/status/391036506133258240[/tweet]

DijonRondo wrote:
Ray owed nothing to the Celtics, but he owed everything to his brothers, KG and Pierce, and the Celtics FANS.
KG and Pierce were the ones who told Ainge to stop the Grizzlies trade, and now he turns his back on them?! (IIRC) The Celtics probably would have made the finals if they had Mayo playing sixth man too.
KG didn't only just do what was best for him, he did what was best for the Celtics organization, because without him, the Celtics wouldn't have gotten the return that they got. Lebron didn't say anything that was reasonable, and anyone who agrees with him is beyond me.
Durins Baynes wrote:My assumptions don't rely on claims I can't prove. You claim Ray asked for $12 mill a year- please provide proof if you're going to insist it's true.

Reservoirdawgs wrote:Let's assume that Allen re-signed with the Celtics last summer - he would have been on a bad team going no where and would now have been traded somewhere he did not want to be (when he could have just signed with whoever he wanted had he gone the free agent route). Do you think any of the Boston fans would bemoan Celtics management for not being loyal to Allen? Of course not, they would have wanted to get rid of him and get anything in return because "he doesn't fit with the rebuilding year".
15th overall wrote:Multiple eye witnesses are enough evidence to send a man to his death in the eyes of the law.. but when it comes to Ray Allen's contract demands that just doesn't cut the mustard.
This is probably all an elaborate ruse to make an ass out of RealGM poster Durins Baynes (and it's working!). Good detective work, gumshoe.