ImageImageImage

Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money"

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,617
And1: 18,713
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#601 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Fri Jul 6, 2018 2:01 pm

Froob wrote:Do you guys think they keep Love? Wouldn’t be shocked if Gilbert just wants to dump the salary. He’s kinda earned that after the lux he’s paid last few years.


I am not a cap expert but this is Love's final year (he has PO but you know he will opt out) and since the cavs are over the cap don't they have to take equal salary back?

The team with the lowest payroll is the Mavs and any trade I tried which dumps Loves salary and sends back 3m in salary JJ Barea won't work.
*Insert witty signature here.*
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#602 » by SMTBSI » Fri Jul 6, 2018 2:08 pm

The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:
Froob wrote:Do you guys think they keep Love? Wouldn’t be shocked if Gilbert just wants to dump the salary. He’s kinda earned that after the lux he’s paid last few years.

I am not a cap expert but this is Love's final year (he has PO but you know he will opt out) and since the cavs are over the cap don't they have to take equal salary back?

Nah, it only works the other way around. If you're over the cap and want to take back money, you obviously have to give away a certain amount, but if you just want to give away money, there's no requirement to take any back. You can always just dump a guy to a team with cap space, if you can find a taker.

Just becomes a "non-simultaneous" trade, and you generate a trade exception which you have a year to use.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#603 » by sully00 » Fri Jul 6, 2018 2:26 pm

Froob wrote:Do you guys think they keep Love? Wouldn’t be shocked if Gilbert just wants to dump the salary. He’s kinda earned that after the lux he’s paid last few years.


Their cap situation is set up so if they just chill and eat this year then the nightmare ends. They owe a protected '19 first to ATL so they have two roads to take on that front. Play for the post season and just give up their '19 1st rounder (top 10 protected) or plan to tank for two years so you don't have to give up the pick. The only guy that anyone is going to trade for is Love nobody else has any real positive value except the Sexton and maybe Nance. Maybe Korver because his salary is so low might pull a 1st but if Evans couldn't get one last year it doesn't seem like a great bet.

While their players don't have a lot of trade value they have the makings of a playoff team. Kevin Love isn't Lebron James but it is always going to be tough to bring FA's to CLE.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,337
And1: 61,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#604 » by Froob » Fri Jul 6, 2018 2:34 pm

sully00 wrote:
Froob wrote:Do you guys think they keep Love? Wouldn’t be shocked if Gilbert just wants to dump the salary. He’s kinda earned that after the lux he’s paid last few years.


Their cap situation is set up so if they just chill and eat this year then the nightmare ends. They owe a protected '19 first to ATL so they have two roads to take on that front. Play for the post season and just give up their '19 1st rounder (top 10 protected) or plan to tank for two years so you don't have to give up the pick. The only guy that anyone is going to trade for is Love nobody else has any real positive value except the Sexton and maybe Nance. Maybe Korver because his salary is so low might pull a 1st but if Evans couldn't get one last year it doesn't seem like a great bet.

While their players don't have a lot of trade value they have the makings of a playoff team. Kevin Love isn't Lebron James but it is always going to be tough to bring FA's to CLE.

Eh probably not with Lue as coach. Maybe the whole vibe of the team changes without the toxicity LeBron brings with him and all the expectations gone. Maybe Lue shocks us tho, who knows. He’s the actual coach now.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,571
And1: 101,360
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#605 » by ConstableGeneva » Fri Jul 6, 2018 2:36 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
ConstableGeneva wrote:
Read on Twitter

SAC is the only one dumb enough to potentially make an offer big enough we won't match.


Someone could go high on a one year offer.

They can do that? There's no minimum number of years? Like two years guaranteed?
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#606 » by sully00 » Fri Jul 6, 2018 2:41 pm

ConstableGeneva wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
ConstableGeneva wrote:
Read on Twitter

SAC is the only one dumb enough to potentially make an offer big enough we won't match.


Someone could go high on a one year offer.

They can do that? There's no minimum number of years? Like two years guaranteed?


No offer sheets have to be for 2 years not including options. They don't have to be guaranteed but I don't see how this would make the Celtics less likely to match.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,095
And1: 14,944
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#607 » by jfs1000d » Fri Jul 6, 2018 3:27 pm

sully00 wrote:
ConstableGeneva wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Someone could go high on a one year offer.

They can do that? There's no minimum number of years? Like two years guaranteed?


No offer sheets have to be for 2 years not including options. They don't have to be guaranteed but I don't see how this would make the Celtics less likely to match.



Smart's a good player. I think we are underselling his ability to impact a game. His shooting isn't great, but I actually think is better than his numbers. Stat heads look only at the advanced shooting numbers, but to me he is much more dangerous than a 36% FG and 30% 3fg%. You still kinda have to guard him.

And, get him as the 30 MPG starting PG, and he's going to do real well in that role. Good ballhandler. Good rebounder, excellent in PnR and absolutely a stunning defender.

I think we will see 40% FG and 35% from 3 from him this year. That's worth $12-13 mil a year.
Fidel Sarcasmo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,358
And1: 3,073
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: hartford, ct.
 

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#608 » by Fidel Sarcasmo » Fri Jul 6, 2018 3:36 pm

Smarts worth what he can get. He’ll get the QO or a hair more. He can’t shoot. I’ve been saying this forever. Teams aren’t gonna pay starter money to a chucker.
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,528
And1: 15,366
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#609 » by celticfan42487 » Fri Jul 6, 2018 3:47 pm

Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:Smarts worth what he can get. He’ll get the QO or a hair more. He can’t shoot. I’ve been saying this forever. Teams aren’t gonna pay starter money to a chucker.


I think that's the golden combo here. Not only is he the worst shooter in the NBA but he's a HUGE chucker and has horrific basketball IQ.

Pounds the rock endlessly dribbling till there's 5 seconds left instead of running sets but he can't dribble past his man.

His approach to the game on offense is just terrible. He's basically weighing down the entire team playing a brand of basketball that is half as efficient as it would be if he just ran a set and got the ball out of his hands as soon as possible. Or made passing plays that his basic level of passing can do like for players coming off curls and picks.

And the rest of the NBA sees that.

He's just not a good ballhandler, has no penetration skill, worst shooter in the NBA, can't finish at the rim for ****... and somehow is blind to all his faults on offense and plays like he's old man Kobe out there.

A "smart" Smart would be a much different player.

And we can only assume how terrible he is to manage and in the locker room when he does things like break his own hand in a contract year because he got "angry" one night and in college punched out a fan in the stands. He has a long track history of not being the best. I won't be surprised when after this year, after he leaves for playing for the QO which is about as much as he's worth, we hear that Brad Stevens most difficult player to coach was Smart and made Rondo look like a saint by comparison. At least Rondo only got injured actually showing up for work and doing his job.
Image
User avatar
drs123310
Sophomore
Posts: 241
And1: 243
Joined: Jun 19, 2014
     

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#610 » by drs123310 » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:13 pm

Smitty, what's your weigh-in on the current situation? Saw you tweeted about the C's & Smart having some good dialogue, now reports are coming out that Smart has not received a call and that he's hurt about it. Is that story baloney?
The Truth hurts
User avatar
Taget
Analyst
Posts: 3,169
And1: 2,631
Joined: Apr 24, 2004
     

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#611 » by Taget » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:30 pm

Moose23 wrote:
Froob wrote:Do you guys think they keep Love? Wouldn’t be shocked if Gilbert just wants to dump the salary. He’s kinda earned that after the lux he’s paid last few years.


They should move Love, but is there a large market out there for him?


A better question is can you get value for him. A bad team might take him with a draft pick. Sacramento might take him as is and if he can put him some numbers maybe try to flip him themselves. But would only give you a nickel and a bag of popcorn.
[quote:545636310b="Darth Celtic"]man, these refs need to stop giving us the benefit of the doubt and start screwing us.[/quote]

Image
Infinite Llamas
RealGM
Posts: 10,701
And1: 24,330
Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Location: Land of Llamas
   

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#612 » by Infinite Llamas » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:38 pm

Smart is your classic case of overconfidence gone awry. For the life of me, I just want to see somebody coach the hell out of this guy and micromanage him until he loses all of his bad habits. Stevens hasn’t shown yet that he’s even going to try and leash him. It’s a shame. He’s such a dynamic defensive player but his value ranks the second the motion shifts to the other side of the court.

Turning Tatum into somebody that can guard (or try to) guard Durant should be our top focus. Kyrie and Rozier can slow down Curry and Brown can run Thompson off of his spots. I think Smart would be effective against Golden State too, and it’s a shame we were minutes away from seeing that chance, but 12 million isn’t something I’d offer to Smart at this juncture.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gerald Green Loves LLamas!
Fidel Sarcasmo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,358
And1: 3,073
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: hartford, ct.
 

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#613 » by Fidel Sarcasmo » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:40 pm

celticfan42487 wrote:
Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:Smarts worth what he can get. He’ll get the QO or a hair more. He can’t shoot. I’ve been saying this forever. Teams aren’t gonna pay starter money to a chucker.


I think that's the golden combo here. Not only is he the worst shooter in the NBA but he's a HUGE chucker and has horrific basketball IQ.

Pounds the rock endlessly dribbling till there's 5 seconds left instead of running sets but he can't dribble past his man.

His approach to the game on offense is just terrible. He's basically weighing down the entire team playing a brand of basketball that is half as efficient as it would be if he just ran a set and got the ball out of his hands as soon as possible. Or made passing plays that his basic level of passing can do like for players coming off curls and picks.

And the rest of the NBA sees that.

He's just not a good ballhandler, has no penetration skill, worst shooter in the NBA, can't finish at the rim for ****... and somehow is blind to all his faults on offense and plays like he's old man Kobe out there.

A "smart" Smart would be a much different player.

And we can only assume how terrible he is to manage and in the locker room when he does things like break his own hand in a contract year because he got "angry" one night and in college punched out a fan in the stands. He has a long track history of not being the best. I won't be surprised when after this year, after he leaves for playing for the QO which is about as much as he's worth, we hear that Brad Stevens most difficult player to coach was Smart and made Rondo look like a saint by comparison. At least Rondo only got injured actually showing up for work and doing his job.


To Smart's Credit, He's really good at the P&R and he's a screen killer, plus killer salesman with the charge on D. but he shoots 10 threes a game and nails 3 a game. All I can think of is those shots could be going to Tatum or Irving or someone who shoots 40% from 3.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#614 » by sully00 » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:43 pm

jfs1000d wrote:
sully00 wrote:
ConstableGeneva wrote:They can do that? There's no minimum number of years? Like two years guaranteed?


No offer sheets have to be for 2 years not including options. They don't have to be guaranteed but I don't see how this would make the Celtics less likely to match.



Smart's a good player. I think we are underselling his ability to impact a game. His shooting isn't great, but I actually think is better than his numbers. Stat heads look only at the advanced shooting numbers, but to me he is much more dangerous than a 36% FG and 30% 3fg%. You still kinda have to guard him.

And, get him as the 30 MPG starting PG, and he's going to do real well in that role. Good ballhandler. Good rebounder, excellent in PnR and absolutely a stunning defender.

I think we will see 40% FG and 35% from 3 from him this year. That's worth $12-13 mil a year.


Marcus has been amazingly consistently bad since he came in the league. 4 years of the same FG% from 2 from 3 from anywhere and there is no where he is actually good from. You can make the argument that he is worst shooter in the history of the NBA nobody in these stat driven times has done so poorly with so much opportunity. You do realize he plays 30 mpg? I love Marcus I just can't talk myself into this improving.

I think while lots of people admire what Marcus brings I can't imagine viewing him as a starter at a position that by its nature demands shooting and scoring. While a valuable bench piece he is 6'4" and not particularly long and frankly whenever someone over commits to this type of player financially it results in an albatross contract that has to be bought out the, Corey Brewer sequence.

I would give Marcus a 5 year deal at 8-9 mil or a 2 year deal at 11 mil. My concern with even this approach is that his market may be 5-6 mil and we are just way over valuing him.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,337
And1: 61,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA-- 

Post#615 » by Froob » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:49 pm

Infinite Llamas wrote:Smart is your classic case of overconfidence gone awry. For the life of me, I just want to see somebody coach the hell out of this guy and micromanage him until he loses all of his bad habits. Stevens hasn’t shown yet that he’s even going to try and leash him. It’s a shame. He’s such a dynamic defensive player but his value ranks the second the motion shifts to the other side of the court.

Turning Tatum into somebody that can guard (or try to) guard Durant should be our top focus. Kyrie and Rozier can slow down Curry and Brown can run Thompson off of his spots. I think Smart would be effective against Golden State too, and it’s a shame we were minutes away from seeing that chance, but 12 million isn’t something I’d offer to Smart at this juncture.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Should sit Smart the rest of the night when he goes full Marcus.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
Scoonie
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,511
And1: 1,801
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: New Hampshire
   

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#616 » by Scoonie » Fri Jul 6, 2018 4:54 pm

I've said this before, but the ideal way to use Marcus would be to play him 20 MPG to guard the opposing team's best player. On the offensive end, limit him to no more than 8 field goal attempts per game and mainly use him to post up and run the pick and roll. He should only be taking outside shot when he's completely wide open.

He's a niche player, not a complete player that should play big minutes. If he could ever know his role he would be dynamite.
Dogen wrote:Celtics win despite Smart having -1 points for the game.
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,528
And1: 15,366
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA-- 

Post#617 » by celticfan42487 » Fri Jul 6, 2018 5:02 pm

Froob wrote:
Infinite Llamas wrote:Smart is your classic case of overconfidence gone awry. For the life of me, I just want to see somebody coach the hell out of this guy and micromanage him until he loses all of his bad habits. Stevens hasn’t shown yet that he’s even going to try and leash him. It’s a shame. He’s such a dynamic defensive player but his value ranks the second the motion shifts to the other side of the court.

Turning Tatum into somebody that can guard (or try to) guard Durant should be our top focus. Kyrie and Rozier can slow down Curry and Brown can run Thompson off of his spots. I think Smart would be effective against Golden State too, and it’s a shame we were minutes away from seeing that chance, but 12 million isn’t something I’d offer to Smart at this juncture.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Should sit Smart the rest of the night when he goes full Marcus.


I find it hard to believe Stevens doesn't want Smart to play with intelligence. I just don't think Smart is coachable. So Stevens plays the player's he's given.

As someone above posted he's made almost no material improvement since coming into the league, might be the worst shooter in NBA history, and his best season very well could have been his rookie year.

Honestly, it wouldn't be great for Smart financially, but the best thing might be if he receives no offers this offseason and no offers next off season and is finally humbled. Then hopefully he'd be open to making what is very obvious and easy changes to play away from his weaknesses on the court and just focus on what he can do as a situational roleplaying type.

He's a Lindsey Hunter type on a winning team in a league that really demands it's guards and wings to be able to hit the 3 and get by their man with the ball in their hands. It's a tough fit for any team but he still has a role to play in this league.
Image
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,791
And1: 70,835
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#618 » by Celts17Pride » Fri Jul 6, 2018 5:12 pm

Sorry but Marcus Smart is the most overrated Celtic of all time. No one comes close. Good player but much ado about nothing.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,097
And1: 27,981
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#619 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Jul 6, 2018 5:14 pm

celticfan42487 wrote:
And we can only assume how terrible he is to manage and in the locker room when he does things like break his own hand in a contract year because he got "angry" one night and in college punched out a fan in the stands. He has a long track history of not being the best. I won't be surprised when after this year, after he leaves for playing for the QO which is about as much as he's worth, we hear that Brad Stevens most difficult player to coach was Smart and made Rondo look like a saint by comparison. At least Rondo only got injured actually showing up for work and doing his job.


How do you explain the video in which Stevens pretty much says Smart is the most valuable personality he's coached in the pros?



That said, "most" might be a slight overstatement.

Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
rickrolled
Head Coach
Posts: 6,453
And1: 2,652
Joined: Nov 12, 2011

Re: Jackie Mac on Marcus Smart's RFA--"He's going for the money" 

Post#620 » by rickrolled » Fri Jul 6, 2018 5:31 pm

Looks like Kings are not looking to add money past this year.

The Sacramento Kings have explored the free agency market but are determined to avoid signing any multiyear contracts that would impact next year's cap.

The Kings will instead focus on the trade market and pursue absorbing contracts in exchange for a first round pick in 2019 or a veteran small forward.

Sacramento Bee

Return to Boston Celtics