BK_2020 wrote:Hal14 wrote:BK_2020 wrote: Tate is having his worst season shooting ever.
Lastly, if poor shooters can become 40% three-point shooters by virtue of joining the Celtics, then why are we targeting 6'4 tweener forwards? Get a 6'10 guy who can't shoot and turn him into a 40% shooter.
Tate is having his best shooting season ever. The stats are right on basketball reference.
3 pt shooting:
20-21 season: 30%
21-22 season: 31%
22-23 season: 28%
23-24 season: 32%
While it looks like he's listed at 6'4" now, I know for a fact that earlier in his career he was listed at 6'5". And he's 230 lbs so pretty similar build to Grant Williams - except tate is quicker, more athletic, better handles, better passing, better defense, better at posting up, driving to the basket but worse shooter..
He's at 31.9% on wide open threes which is the worst since his rookie season. He shoots .357 on corner threes. He is a horrible shooter.
Having a similar build to Grant Williams is not a positive.
Yeah well Grant Williams' build has allowed him to defend 4's and 5's, despite being shorter.
So i pointed that out, since you were implying that Tate is just a 6'4" short guy who is undersized. He's not, if you've seen him play, he plays much bigger than his listed height. Kind of like how PJ Tucker plays much bigger than his.
Also, it's weird. The rest of us are bringing up possible trade targets, discussing the pros and cons of each. You're contributing nothing except negativity about every player that's brought up.
Anyone we get is gonna have flaws - we're not gonna get a perfect player, considering the financial implications, the limited assets/resources we have to make a move and how few teams right now appear to be sellers and considering the limited amount of playing time we can offer any player we might add, given how good our top 6 guys are..
















