ImageImageImage

Summer Trade/(OffSeason) Thread 2017

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,979
And1: 8,111
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#681 » by VeryMuchWoke » Thu Jun 8, 2017 1:52 am

Andrew McCeltic wrote:I could also see us getting out of Horford's contract agreeably at that point - send him to Washington, where he almost signed, get Gortat and Mahinmi, send Ian somewhere else for a big contract, salary chip. You could do Horford to WAS, Gortat and Butler to BOS, Mahinmi, Jaylen + to Chicago for Butler.


Andrew McCeltic wrote:
If it's giving us Gortat and Jimmy Butler? And it's replacing their one aging good player with a big contract with another aging good player with a bigger contract, and is cap neutral for them? CHI would be getting Mahinmi as salary ballast, with other assets from us/WAS going to them.


Look at the trade from Washington's perspective. It's pretty easy to see they get over on us and Chicago. They give up the two worst assets (and worst players) in the deal, and come out of it with Horford. There are 0 teams that would prefer Ian and Gortat's deal to Horford's.

It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#682 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jun 8, 2017 1:52 am

Right, except Drummond does impact our rebounding immediately. I'd also say about his scoring, you know, anyone remember the year Rondo was out and we had Avery playing point guard? Disaster. But I'm not sure you get this year's Avery, with great situational handles, without that year's Avery bottoming out.

Drummond doesn't need to become Al Jefferson with varied post moves. He needs one or two reliable go-to's, some sense of how to use his size and strength, and that's it. Then he's a competent scorer you have to at least defend against.

He's not my first choice, he has a ways to go, but with Horford, whoever else, Brad, Danny, he'd be in an environment to maximize his potential, teach him well and at the right pace, and increase the odds he gets better. He'd be a defensible gamble at the 5 spot. My only worry would be giving up the BKN 18 for him and then missing on a better center in next year's draft.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#683 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jun 8, 2017 1:54 am

iTalkToTheLord wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:I could also see us getting out of Horford's contract agreeably at that point - send him to Washington, where he almost signed, get Gortat and Mahinmi, send Ian somewhere else for a big contract, salary chip. You could do Horford to WAS, Gortat and Butler to BOS, Mahinmi, Jaylen + to Chicago for Butler.


Andrew McCeltic wrote:
If it's giving us Gortat and Jimmy Butler? And it's replacing their one aging good player with a big contract with another aging good player with a bigger contract, and is cap neutral for them? CHI would be getting Mahinmi as salary ballast, with other assets from us/WAS going to them.


Look at the trade from Washington's perspective. It's pretty easy to see they get over on us and Chicago. They give up the two worst assets (and worst players) in the deal, and come out of it with Horford. There are 0 teams that would prefer Ian and Gortat's deal to Horford's.

It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston


Those Washington picks are unlikely to be in the lottery. But I think you're overestimating how valuable that salary dump is to Washington, and underestimating how much we'd benefit in the deal.
User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,979
And1: 8,111
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#684 » by VeryMuchWoke » Thu Jun 8, 2017 1:59 am

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
iTalkToTheLord wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:I could also see us getting out of Horford's contract agreeably at that point - send him to Washington, where he almost signed, get Gortat and Mahinmi, send Ian somewhere else for a big contract, salary chip. You could do Horford to WAS, Gortat and Butler to BOS, Mahinmi, Jaylen + to Chicago for Butler.


Andrew McCeltic wrote:
If it's giving us Gortat and Jimmy Butler? And it's replacing their one aging good player with a big contract with another aging good player with a bigger contract, and is cap neutral for them? CHI would be getting Mahinmi as salary ballast, with other assets from us/WAS going to them.


Look at the trade from Washington's perspective. It's pretty easy to see they get over on us and Chicago. They give up the two worst assets (and worst players) in the deal, and come out of it with Horford. There are 0 teams that would prefer Ian and Gortat's deal to Horford's.

It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston


Those Washington picks are unlikely to be in the lottery. But I think you're overestimating how valuable that salary dump is to Washington, and underestimating how much we'd benefit in the deal.


It's an upgrade for us right now, until Gortat goes off a cliff, gets injured, or expires in 2 years. We get the best player in the deal so I don't hate it, but sacrificing young players and/or picks to make a marginal win-now move isn't optimal in my opinion.

Washington gives up a pick to dump Mahinmi, and another to upgrade Gortat to Horford. Pretty fair. It's not perfect by any stretch and I'm not advocating it by any stretch. I was only trying to illustrate the imbalance in your initial proposal.
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,191
And1: 25,971
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#685 » by Curmudgeon » Thu Jun 8, 2017 2:06 am

I'm all for trading Horford, but you ought to be able to get more than that. My target would be DeAndre Jordan. The Clippers are about to go into complete rebuild mode.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#686 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jun 8, 2017 2:44 am

If we acquired Kevin Love for Bradley+, getting Jimmy Butler (++++++) and Marcin Gortat for Horford is A+++++++, especially because you're faced with the problem of dealing your best paid player, best citizen, a year after you signed him. Which I would hate to do, honestly.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,337
And1: 61,667
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#687 » by Froob » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:06 pm

iTalkToTheLord wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:I could also see us getting out of Horford's contract agreeably at that point - send him to Washington, where he almost signed, get Gortat and Mahinmi, send Ian somewhere else for a big contract, salary chip. You could do Horford to WAS, Gortat and Butler to BOS, Mahinmi, Jaylen + to Chicago for Butler.


Andrew McCeltic wrote:
If it's giving us Gortat and Jimmy Butler? And it's replacing their one aging good player with a big contract with another aging good player with a bigger contract, and is cap neutral for them? CHI would be getting Mahinmi as salary ballast, with other assets from us/WAS going to them.


Look at the trade from Washington's perspective. It's pretty easy to see they get over on us and Chicago. They give up the two worst assets (and worst players) in the deal, and come out of it with Horford. There are 0 teams that would prefer Ian and Gortat's deal to Horford's.

It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston

Better be a hell of a sweetner lol. Two late picks (and a pick swap?) for Butler? No way that's happening.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,337
And1: 61,667
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#688 » by Froob » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:07 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:I'm all for trading Horford, but you ought to be able to get more than that. My target would be DeAndre Jordan. The Clippers are about to go into complete rebuild mode.

I think Horford is better than Jordan.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,065
And1: 15,674
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#689 » by Gant » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:16 pm

Froob wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:I'm all for trading Horford, but you ought to be able to get more than that. My target would be DeAndre Jordan. The Clippers are about to go into complete rebuild mode.

I think Horford is better than Jordan.


Don't post that sentence on the Chicago board.
User avatar
jcappy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,785
And1: 515
Joined: Dec 21, 2004

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#690 » by jcappy » Thu Jun 8, 2017 3:17 pm

I came across a mock draft today (Matt Lombardo) that has us trading #1 to Philly for Okafor, Holmes, and the LA '18 pick. Then trading the #3 for the #5 and #10 and taking Jackson and Smith. Four for one or five for one actually.
Champions aren't made in the gyms. Champions are made from something they have deep inside them -- a desire, a dream, a vision.
~ Muhammad Ali
User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,979
And1: 8,111
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#691 » by VeryMuchWoke » Thu Jun 8, 2017 4:00 pm

Froob wrote:
iTalkToTheLord wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:I could also see us getting out of Horford's contract agreeably at that point - send him to Washington, where he almost signed, get Gortat and Mahinmi, send Ian somewhere else for a big contract, salary chip. You could do Horford to WAS, Gortat and Butler to BOS, Mahinmi, Jaylen + to Chicago for Butler.


Andrew McCeltic wrote:
If it's giving us Gortat and Jimmy Butler? And it's replacing their one aging good player with a big contract with another aging good player with a bigger contract, and is cap neutral for them? CHI would be getting Mahinmi as salary ballast, with other assets from us/WAS going to them.


Look at the trade from Washington's perspective. It's pretty easy to see they get over on us and Chicago. They give up the two worst assets (and worst players) in the deal, and come out of it with Horford. There are 0 teams that would prefer Ian and Gortat's deal to Horford's.

It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston

Better be a hell of a sweetner lol. Two late picks (and a pick swap?) for Butler? No way that's happening.


Definitely, but its better than the original deal for them which was Mahinmi and Jaylen for Butler. To be fair, we have a lot of sweetener.
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,293
And1: 20,755
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#692 » by djFan71 » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:07 pm

Zeller & resigned JJ or Amir for Pau Gasol as they look to shed salary for CP3? I think either of them going from Brad to Pop would work out nicely for SAS.

If you're in the Hayward camp, do this after we sign/s&t for him. Would have to come together quick with Zeller's guarantee date pretty early, I believe.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,489
And1: 33,484
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#693 » by GoCeltics123 » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:10 pm

djFan71 wrote:Zeller & resigned JJ or Amir for Pau Gasol as they look to shed salary for CP3? I think either of them going from Brad to Pop would work out nicely for SAS.

If you're in the Hayward camp, do this after we sign/s&t for him. Would have to come together quick with Zeller's guarantee date pretty early, I believe.

Eh, Gasol seems pretty cooked at this point to me
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#694 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:14 pm

jcappy wrote:I came across a mock draft today (Matt Lombardo) that has us trading #1 to Philly for Okafor, Holmes, and the LA '18 pick. Then trading the #3 for the #5 and #10 and taking Jackson and Smith. Four for one or five for one actually.


So, Okafor, Holmes, Josh Jackson, Dennis Smith, and LA '18? Jackson doesn't last to 5, and that's like trading a dollar for five quarters. In the NBA, one dollar is worth more.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#695 » by ddb » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:18 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:I'm all for trading Horford, but you ought to be able to get more than that. My target would be DeAndre Jordan. The Clippers are about to go into complete rebuild mode.


The Celtics aren't trading Horford anytime soon. He is a great fit in Boston. Why in the world would you want a Modern style big man like Horford being traded for a DJordan or Drummond type? NO THANKS. Those guys are 1 dimensional.

People are sleeping on Zizic. Can't wait until summer league. You will all be salivating of the mouth over Zicic/Brown/Fultz.
CeltsfaninDC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,791
And1: 2,338
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#696 » by CeltsfaninDC » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:29 pm

iTalkToTheLord wrote:
It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston


You guys would absolutely HATE Gortat. If you think KO is inconsistent, just watch Gortat for a few games. He's maddening.
User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,979
And1: 8,111
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#697 » by VeryMuchWoke » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:36 pm

CeltsfaninDC wrote:
iTalkToTheLord wrote:
It should be more like:

Horford to Washington
Ian, Was 2018/2020 (unprotected), Bos Sweetener to Chicago
Butler, Gortat to Boston


You guys would absolutely HATE Gortat. If you think KO is inconsistent, just watch Gortat for a few games. He's maddening.


I'm not in favor of this deal. I was simply arguing against the original deal by Andrew, which was considerably worse for Chicago and Boston.
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#698 » by ddb » Thu Jun 8, 2017 5:38 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
jcappy wrote:I came across a mock draft today (Matt Lombardo) that has us trading #1 to Philly for Okafor, Holmes, and the LA '18 pick. Then trading the #3 for the #5 and #10 and taking Jackson and Smith. Four for one or five for one actually.


So, Okafor, Holmes, Josh Jackson, Dennis Smith, and LA '18? Jackson doesn't last to 5, and that's like trading a dollar for five quarters. In the NBA, one dollar is worth more.


I sure hope the contributors to this board realize that the NBA is significantly different than the NHL, NFL and MLB. Basketball above all else, is a sport where you need great players to win. There are only a handful of great players in the league at any given time.
Every single NBA champion, aside from a select few, win because they have a superstar or 2 or 3 on their team. It's a 5 on 5 sport, where in key playoff games MAYBE 8 players see meaningful rotation minutes....the stars play 40+ minus when it matters.

The trade idea listed above by Matt Lombardo is a no brainer if we were talking about the NE Patriots. But I agree that trading quarters for dollars is absolutely ridiculous in basketball.

You draft Fultz at #1 because he has a legitimate chance of becoming a superstar guard. Potentially a Top 10 player, and maybe even a Top 5 player in the league down the line.

You sign Hayward because he is an efficient All-Star entering his prime years, who also happens to have a great relationship with your head coach. He is an excellent #2 or #3 scoring option, who is versatile and won't hurt you defensively. He handles the ball, rebounds, passes, takes good shots and plays within the flow of his team. Pair him with what we already have and the Celtics become very, very difficult to beat. I'm not saying they would be the favorites, but they would have a shot at making the finals assuming Ainge can round out the roster to where it makes sense.
I am NOT sold on the Cavs being this Eastern Conference juggernaut. LeBron is amazing, but their roster isn't deep. It's old. Kyrie and Love are awesome, but not in that Top tier. They cannot do it without LeBron.

Be patient people. The Golden State Warriors started making noise with David Lee as their leader. Meanwhile Steph Curry, Klay, Barnes started emerging. Dray was drafted and fit in seamlessly. They acquired Iggy & Bogut during this transition time...by the 13-14 season they finished 51-31, 2nd in the pacific. Lost to the Clippers 4-3 in the first round.....but they were right there....A fresh coaching outlook (Kerr) and the taste of success was all it took for their young core to take over.....

Honestly, I feel like the Celtics are ahead of schedule and in an even better position then the Warriors were 5 years ago. Ainge doesn't want to screw this up by rushing things. The Celtics situation is unique in that they can be good AND draft in the top 5 because of the BK trade. Like Golden State, the Celtics have mastered the cap situation, traded well, and all that's left is Boston continuing down the path they're on.

The Warriors are insanely good. Durant signing there wasn't to the fault of the Warriors. They were in a great, great position to sign a superstar player to join a superstar team. It sucks for the league. I think Durant is lame for signing there....but you cannot fault the Warriors. The GREAT NEWS is that Boston is on that same path... The Celtics time will come where it's am embarrassment of riches and the Green team is running the league. In fact, I'm pretty confident it will be the CELTICS that eventually take down the mighty Warriors. Just give it a little time.....but also enjoy the ride!
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,416
And1: 27,983
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#699 » by Green89 » Thu Jun 8, 2017 6:15 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:Yeah, I'm ready for some rumors about real trades that could help.


A. Sherrod to the rescue! :lol:

http://www.csnne.com/boston-celtics/two-potential-boston-celtics-offers-new-york-knicks-kristaps-porzingis
OFWGKTA
General Manager
Posts: 9,014
And1: 12,141
Joined: May 20, 2011

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#700 » by OFWGKTA » Thu Jun 8, 2017 6:21 pm

Green89 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:Yeah, I'm ready for some rumors about real trades that could help.


A. Sherrod to the rescue! :lol:

http://www.csnne.com/boston-celtics/two-potential-boston-celtics-offers-new-york-knicks-kristaps-porzingis



How do I go about getting paid to write **** trade scenario articles along with **** memes to go with them?
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...


GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.

Return to Boston Celtics