Andrew McCeltic wrote:jcappy wrote:I came across a mock draft today (Matt Lombardo) that has us trading #1 to Philly for Okafor, Holmes, and the LA '18 pick. Then trading the #3 for the #5 and #10 and taking Jackson and Smith. Four for one or five for one actually.
So, Okafor, Holmes, Josh Jackson, Dennis Smith, and LA '18? Jackson doesn't last to 5, and that's like trading a dollar for five quarters. In the NBA, one dollar is worth more.
I sure hope the contributors to this board realize that the NBA is significantly different than the NHL, NFL and MLB. Basketball above all else, is a sport where you need great players to win. There are only a handful of great players in the league at any given time.
Every single NBA champion, aside from a select few, win because they have a superstar or 2 or 3 on their team. It's a 5 on 5 sport, where in key playoff games MAYBE 8 players see meaningful rotation minutes....the stars play 40+ minus when it matters.
The trade idea listed above by Matt Lombardo is a no brainer if we were talking about the NE Patriots. But I agree that trading quarters for dollars is absolutely ridiculous in basketball.
You draft Fultz at #1 because he has a legitimate chance of becoming a superstar guard. Potentially a Top 10 player, and maybe even a Top 5 player in the league down the line.
You sign Hayward because he is an efficient All-Star entering his prime years, who also happens to have a great relationship with your head coach. He is an excellent #2 or #3 scoring option, who is versatile and won't hurt you defensively. He handles the ball, rebounds, passes, takes good shots and plays within the flow of his team. Pair him with what we already have and the Celtics become very, very difficult to beat. I'm not saying they would be the favorites, but they would have a shot at making the finals assuming Ainge can round out the roster to where it makes sense.
I am NOT sold on the Cavs being this Eastern Conference juggernaut. LeBron is amazing, but their roster isn't deep. It's old. Kyrie and Love are awesome, but not in that Top tier. They cannot do it without LeBron.
Be patient people. The Golden State Warriors started making noise with David Lee as their leader. Meanwhile Steph Curry, Klay, Barnes started emerging. Dray was drafted and fit in seamlessly. They acquired Iggy & Bogut during this transition time...by the 13-14 season they finished 51-31, 2nd in the pacific. Lost to the Clippers 4-3 in the first round.....but they were right there....A fresh coaching outlook (Kerr) and the taste of success was all it took for their young core to take over.....
Honestly, I feel like the Celtics are ahead of schedule and in an even better position then the Warriors were 5 years ago. Ainge doesn't want to screw this up by rushing things. The Celtics situation is unique in that they can be good AND draft in the top 5 because of the BK trade. Like Golden State, the Celtics have mastered the cap situation, traded well, and all that's left is Boston continuing down the path they're on.
The Warriors are insanely good. Durant signing there wasn't to the fault of the Warriors. They were in a great, great position to sign a superstar player to join a superstar team. It sucks for the league. I think Durant is lame for signing there....but you cannot fault the Warriors. The GREAT NEWS is that Boston is on that same path... The Celtics time will come where it's am embarrassment of riches and the Green team is running the league. In fact, I'm pretty confident it will be the CELTICS that eventually take down the mighty Warriors. Just give it a little time.....but also enjoy the ride!