Love in town to "see what it's like"
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Ben-N1ce
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,846
- And1: 20,255
- Joined: Jul 18, 2009
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
My biggest worry with the Love thing is that if there isn't a mystery 3rd player. I don't see Love signing long term. The team just wouldn't be good enough to warrant it if he just wants to win. It would be a playoff team in the East that can make the playoffs but do no real damage. Ainge has to pull off some magic.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
StojkoVrankovic
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,721
- And1: 9,600
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
The Kings can't afford to trade Ben/their Lotto pick when Love will simply leave next season. They can say they don't care about an extension, but it would be devastating to a team that has been garbage for a decade.
RIP texas celtic, 12/10/14 - 12/10/14
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
StojkoVrankovic wrote:The Kings can't afford to trade Ben/their Lotto pick when Love will simply leave next season. They can say they don't care about an extension, but it would be devastating to a team that has been garbage for a decade.
Exactly. other than Love and Cousins, their team will royally suck. Love will definitely not re-sign with them.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- Avalanche
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,522
- And1: 1,498
- Joined: May 21, 2007
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Ben-N1ce wrote:My biggest worry with the Love thing is that if there isn't a mystery 3rd player. I don't see Love signing long term. The team just wouldn't be good enough to warrant it if he just wants to win. It would be a playoff team in the East that can make the playoffs but do no real damage. Ainge has to pull off some magic.
Even if the only other move was to get a guy like Asik.. if we rolled out Rondo/Bradley/Green/Love/Asik with one of KO/Sully, Fav, Wallace, Bayless?, and whoever else we added to the bench.. we're a certain lock for the playoffs and really could trouble anyone
If Love came here and made a strong showing in a second round, that's already more success than he has had in Minnesota and I think it would be enough to keep him around

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- Slartibartfast
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 13,912
- And1: 10,060
- Joined: Oct 12, 2004
- Location: Medieval England, Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
jfs1000d wrote:What could the Kings offer?
Is McLemore better prospect than Sullinger?
Not in my book. Sullinger's half-decent rookie season (at the same age) was much better than McLemore's.
McLemore has shown nothing of value at the NBA level yet - doesn't do anything well.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Ben-N1ce
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,846
- And1: 20,255
- Joined: Jul 18, 2009
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Avalanche wrote:Ben-N1ce wrote:My biggest worry with the Love thing is that if there isn't a mystery 3rd player. I don't see Love signing long term. The team just wouldn't be good enough to warrant it if he just wants to win. It would be a playoff team in the East that can make the playoffs but do no real damage. Ainge has to pull off some magic.
Even if the only other move was to get a guy like Asik.. if we rolled out Rondo/Bradley/Green/Love/Asik with one of KO/Sully, Fav, Wallace, Bayless?, and whoever else we added to the bench.. we're a certain lock for the playoffs and really could trouble anyone
If Love came here and made a strong showing in a second round, that's already more success than he has had in Minnesota and I think it would be enough to keep him around
There is no lock we land Asik that's my point. Without something already laid out it lessen's the Celtics chances for sure IMO.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- Bar Fight
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,937
- And1: 17,260
- Joined: Sep 30, 2013
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
I just don't see the Kings putting together a better offer than us. We have way too many first rounders. Thank god for the Brooklyn deal last year. Danny didn't get NEARLY enough credit for pulling that off, he should have immediately been the frontrunner for executive of the year.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- Dogen
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 12,721
- Joined: Apr 23, 2004
- Location: Hugonda
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Bar Fight wrote:I just don't see the Kings putting together a better offer than us. We have way too many first rounders. Thank god for the Brooklyn deal last year. Danny didn't get NEARLY enough credit for pulling that off, he should have immediately been the frontrunner for executive of the year.
Let's see if he can bring back three first rounders in the Love trade-- THAT would get people's attention.

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Fidel Sarcasmo
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,358
- And1: 3,073
- Joined: Jul 03, 2003
- Location: hartford, ct.
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
The Sac rumor could just be a rumor floated out by Timberwolves brass to try and get the celtics to offer more than what they're currently slated to offer. I dont believe for a second that Sacramento would trade the farm for one year of K Love.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
PaulGaston
- Junior
- Posts: 366
- And1: 157
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
FingerRoll wrote:PaulGaston wrote:I'm sure Boston is one possible destination, but there are teams that can outbid them. Don't get your hopes up.
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:PaulGaston wrote:I'm sure Boston is one possible destination, but there are teams that can outbid them. Don't get your hopes up.
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
What team are you a fan Of ?
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
PaulGaston
- Junior
- Posts: 366
- And1: 157
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Afam wrote:PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
What team are you a fan Of ?
If you were a real Celtic fan, my ironic username would be an obvious clue. What team are you a fan of?
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- RondoToKG
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,767
- And1: 1,589
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
- Location: Delta Quadrant
-
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:PaulGaston wrote:I'm sure Boston is one possible destination, but there are teams that can outbid them. Don't get your hopes up.
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
I know a lot of people like Jackie but she will always be the journalist who claimed KG was going to retire 892374829342 times the season before he reupped for a couple more years. To me, that's sounds like someone who didn't have a clue what they were talking about and just assumed things putting rumors out there.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
PaulGaston
- Junior
- Posts: 366
- And1: 157
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
RondoToKG wrote:PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
I know a lot of people like Jackie but she will always be the journalist who claimed KG was going to retire 892374829342 times the season before he reupped for a couple more years. To me, that's sounds like someone who didn't have a clue what they were talking about and just assumed things putting rumors out there.
That's a fair point... but I don't remember her ever conclusively saying that KG was going to retire... just that he was strongly considering it. Which he was by his own admission...
I think she's well respected and has sources.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- Slartibartfast
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 13,912
- And1: 10,060
- Joined: Oct 12, 2004
- Location: Medieval England, Iowa
- Contact:
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:PaulGaston wrote:I'm sure Boston is one possible destination, but there are teams that can outbid them. Don't get your hopes up.
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
When/where did Jackie weigh in? I haven't seen it.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
PaulGaston wrote:Afam wrote:PaulGaston wrote:That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
What team are you a fan Of ?
If you were a real Celtic fan, my ironic username would be an obvious clue. What team are you a fan of?
Nvm. My logo clearly says what team I rep. You didn't have to be so snappy. I was jus asking a simple question but nvm. Btw I have no idea who you are referring to on your username. I probably wasn't even born in that era:
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
PaulGaston
- Junior
- Posts: 366
- And1: 157
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Slartibartfast wrote:PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
When/where did Jackie weigh in? I haven't seen it.
Her comments were on Around the Horn.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
PaulGaston
- Junior
- Posts: 366
- And1: 157
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Afam wrote:PaulGaston wrote:Afam wrote:
What team are you a fan Of ?
If you were a real Celtic fan, my ironic username would be an obvious clue. What team are you a fan of?
Nvm. My logo clearly says what team I rep. You didn't have to be so snappy. I was jus asking a simple question but nvm. Btw I have no idea who you are referring to on your username. I probably wasn't even born in that era:
Lol no worries. I understand a lot of Celtics fans didn't exist prior to 2007. I didn't mean to come off so snappy.
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
- GreenMachine
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,416
- And1: 998
- Joined: Jun 05, 2003
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
RondoToKG wrote:PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
I know a lot of people like Jackie but she will always be the journalist who claimed KG was going to retire 892374829342 times the season before he reupped for a couple more years. To me, that's sounds like someone who didn't have a clue what they were talking about and just assumed things putting rumors out there.
She also claimed just a few weeks before last year's draft that we were going after Milsap or Josh Smith to give KG/PP/Rondo one final run at a chip. She said this not as opinion... she claimed to have sources... so...
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
-
Afam
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,148
- And1: 8,437
- Joined: Nov 29, 2011
Re: Love in town to "see what it's like"
Slartibartfast wrote:PaulGaston wrote:FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.
That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.
As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.
Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.
When/where did Jackie weigh in? I haven't seen it.
6:30 on early edition. They're going to show a re run of it at 7:30.







