Triple7 wrote:Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:Triple7 wrote:
I don’t like Ime at all as a human being. I’ve moved on from him a long time. Joe is sometimes so stubborn its **** frustrating. Not calling timeouts and setting up a play on crucial times is something i can’t understand about him.
His timeouts this year have improved and there are a lot of good signs about the way we are starting to play.
Joe has admitted he didn't have the right feel for timeouts at times in the playoffs but still doesn't subscribe to timeouts to stop runs in every instance. For the record statistics support Joe on that front. Joe thinking differently doesn't make him stubborn, but in reality most elite coaches and players are pretty stubborn, because the good side to stubbornness is persistence which is a requirement for most to get to that level.
I just don’t trust him yet. Still have doubts he has anything in his bag at all during end of games plays. That end of regulation against the Wolves is a classic example. Game is tied, should have called a time out there and designed a play. Instead he let Jaylen put up a horrible shot. The reasoning you don’t want the other team to set up their defense are bs. Also, you can’t compare him to coaches like Pop and phil, who are as stubborn as you can get. Those guys have proven themselves already. and most of us wanted to strangle Joe for not calling timeouts last year to break opposing teams momentum.
Most plays are drawn up to get a good open shot, something Jaylen had because the defense wasn't set up, so that's not a good example to support your argument IMO. Which ever way you go it will pay off sometimes, sometimes not.
Ime and the Cs got so much credit for trust in each other not to call a timeout at the end of game 1 Vs Brooklyn, round 1 2022. How is that different?
Having said all that, I do hope that Joe will have the sense to do it at times if he feels the Cs offense needs settling down first.