jfs1000d wrote:exculpatory wrote:https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766117
HQ + azithromycin = not efficacious in seriously ill COVID-19 patients.
Await the results of optimally designed studies.
Don’t you think we are chasing our tail here with HQ?
Early results arent promising, and the only reason it has this visibility is that the president pushes it. If there wasn’t a political reason to pursue, would we have cut bait on the studies?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There was a very large amount of anecdotal evidence that HQ + azithromycin was indeed efficacious.
Anecdotal evidence, however, as has been known forever, can be EXTREMELY misleading.
All things considered, IMO, it is worthwhile to let the ongoing, prospective, randomized trials play out & see what they show - in BOTH severely ill patients (where observational studies like the one just reported in JAMA have so far not demonstrated efficacy) & also in mild-moderately Ill patients.
And the **** QTc interval should be determined prior to treatment & carefully monitored during treatment in ALL patients in EVERY **** study (as per my other recent HQ post that you also responded to).
When non-medical people run their mouths about medical stuff (especially dangerously stupid jackwads with the insight of a mother **** ameba), it makes my head explode. His tongue should be glued to his palate.
Gotta run - time for my daily IV Lysol infusion.






















