claycarver wrote:ConstableGeneva wrote:claycarver wrote:
I don't share your concern with outdoor activities. From everything I'm reading, it's prolonged exposure indoors that creates the risk.
It's possible that the people below got infected elsewhere (indoors), but I still wouldn't discount the likelihood they got it from the outdoor events they attended. From my standpoint, better safe than sorry so I personally would still wear a mask and practice social distancing whenever I go outside. Oh, and you wouldn't catch me in a covid party among people who think infecting themselves would make them immune.
Protestors:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-wisconsin-protests-test-positive-department-of-health-services-a9509486.html
Spring Breakers:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/least-28-texas-spring-breakers-test-positive-covid-19-after-n1173231
The college students chartered a plane together...and I'm guessing they didn't distance themselves from each other when they got to Mexico. It's surprising more of them weren't infected.
Protestors must have a higher percentage of cases among them having nothing to do with attending a rally...this is how they are living. It is highly unlikely that an outdoor protest rally is most risky activity they engaged in that day, much less the last 3 months.
Neither of these examples come close to addressing the excellent blog entry Floyd posted in this thread which explained the various threat levels for indoor and outdoor activities.
https://www.erinbromage.com/post/the-risks-know-them-avoid-them
That's my bad that I got drawn into the outdoor-vs.-indoor argument. My main point was these people seem to share that "cavalier attitude" and lack of common sense with their way of dealing with this disease. (You even made the similar point that they don't seem to care about engaging in activities that pose significant risk.) Half-jokingly, if they're going to catch the disease somehow, why not volunteer their bodies to scientific research in service of progress towards finding a cure/vaccine for this thing.
And yes, I agree with you (and the blog -- read it the other day) about which settings pose higher risk of catching the disease.























