ImageImageImage

Sophmores, 2020-21 – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Tacko

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,083
And1: 27,946
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#81 » by Fencer reregistered » Tue Oct 8, 2019 7:17 am

cloverleaf wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:They absolutely will


There are a lot of guys who seem to absolutely deserve minutes, starting with:

Tatum, Hayward, Brown
Walker, Smart
Kanter
G. Williams and Edwards, as you say.

That's 8 before we get to Theis, Poirier or R. Williams, let alone the late-lottery rookie.


That's only three guards before you get to Edwards.


There are five guys ahead of Edwards who can comfortably play as a guard. Anybody competing for minutes at PF (e.g. Semi or G. Williams) is sort of competing for minutes with Edwards because of the natural SFs' positional versatility. That said, I don't think Stevens minds play a long rotation, especially earlier in the season, and I agree with your obvious presumption that Edwards is ahead of Langford.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,378
And1: 7,677
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#82 » by cloverleaf » Tue Oct 8, 2019 10:23 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:
cloverleaf wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:
There are a lot of guys who seem to absolutely deserve minutes, starting with:

Tatum, Hayward, Brown
Walker, Smart
Kanter
G. Williams and Edwards, as you say.

That's 8 before we get to Theis, Poirier or R. Williams, let alone the late-lottery rookie.


That's only three guards before you get to Edwards.


There are five guys ahead of Edwards who can comfortably play as a guard. Anybody competing for minutes at PF (e.g. Semi or G. Williams) is sort of competing for minutes with Edwards because of the natural SFs' positional versatility. That said, I don't think Stevens minds play a long rotation, especially earlier in the season, and I agree with your obvious presumption that Edwards is ahead of Langford.


Edwards could actually be their best rotation-commanding guard defending the fast PGs. And agree Stevens if fine with playing lots of guys.

Meanwhile, Perk wants a Tacko jersey: https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/celtics/2019/10/07/celtic-kendrick-perkins-fast-becoming-star-nba-analyst-now-for-espn-only/HtKYpNiq6t8YetGj8IRgBI/story.html
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,084
And1: 61,400
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#83 » by Parliament10 » Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:29 pm

Read on Twitter
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,646
And1: 31,129
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#84 » by 31to6 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:42 am

I'm so impressed by these guys. All of them. (well, not you Strus, **** off)

I mean Tacko's a novelty right now, and I'm all aboard that bandwagon, but Williams, Edwards and Waters can just flat out play, right now, in a good team's rotation. After watching the Dancing Bear and James Young etc. for the last few years I'd forgotten what that feels like (obviously we've been doing better at the top of the draft, but these mid-to-late guys are a welcome change of pace).

And Romeo's one highlight tonight was a **** highlight, so here's hoping on that one too.

Ditch Wannamaker for Waters yesterday, Danny. One's a decent bargain bin foreign find who doesn't fit our timeline and the other is clearly going to positively impact games and team culture.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,083
And1: 27,946
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#85 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:36 am

My excitement about Romeo is somewhat tempered by the fact that a large majority of the highlights I've seen of him have him doing the same thing -- driving to the right side of the basket and laying the ball in. Still, while I note the relative lack of evidence for the optimistic view of him, there's even less evidence supporting pessimism.

I'm very high on Edwards, and feel good about Fall, Green, Waters, G. Williams and Langford as well. I'm not bothered by the possible lack of roster space to keep Strus.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,084
And1: 61,400
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#86 » by Parliament10 » Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:05 pm

G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, & Tacko all played well.
Langford also did well for his time out there. Tough Break for the Kid = Injury Bug.

Strus, I believe will be Waived, before the Season starts.
Green & Poirier are too old for me to consider them Rookies. They've been around for awhile.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
User avatar
Bad-Thoma
Head Coach
Posts: 7,228
And1: 10,160
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: Still riding proud on the C's bandwagon

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#87 » by Bad-Thoma » Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:52 pm

I've been really impressed with Waters, he's a damned mongoose with those steals on the ball handler and he looks comfortable running an offense. I wasn't expecting much when he was drafted, my eyes were opened a little with the way he attacked ball handlers in summer league but grain of salt etc, and now playing against better competition he's still pretty impressive. Not bad for a 51st pick.
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,378
And1: 7,677
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#88 » by cloverleaf » Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:13 pm

Parliament10 wrote:G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, & Tacko all played well.
Langford also did well for his time out there. Tough Break for the Kid = Injury Bug.

Strus, I believe will be Waived, before the Season starts.
Green & Poirier are too old for me to consider them Rookies. They've been around for awhile.


I'm thinking Strus is the guy who could put pressure on Semi, since he seems to be the young 3&D wing with better shooting and a better feel for the game.
User avatar
AKFO
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,308
And1: 1,736
Joined: May 24, 2012
   

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#89 » by AKFO » Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:41 pm

Prolly been answered somewhere but do we have discretion to sign Tremont Waters to a two way? Or will other teams be able to pick him up
Image
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,065
And1: 15,674
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#90 » by Gant » Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:02 pm

AKFO wrote:Prolly been answered somewhere but do we have discretion to sign Tremont Waters to a two way? Or will other teams be able to pick him up


He's already signed to a 2 way, which locks him up.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#91 » by GuyClinch » Tue Oct 15, 2019 1:46 am

Bad-Thoma wrote:I've been really impressed with Waters, he's a damned mongoose with those steals on the ball handler and he looks comfortable running an offense. I wasn't expecting much when he was drafted, my eyes were opened a little with the way he attacked ball handlers in summer league but grain of salt etc, and now playing against better competition he's still pretty impressive. Not bad for a 51st pick.


Waters is killing it - looks really good for a tiny guy. Shades of IT2 with more point guard skills.. If this guy had a few more inches he would have gone very high in the draft.
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#92 » by zoyathedestroya » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:37 am

Read on Twitter

Muggsy Bogues, 20 cms shorter than Tremont, had a 14-season career.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 9,521
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#93 » by sam_I_am » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:42 am

Best off season by Ainge in a long time. It looked like it would be the worst when Kyrie dumped on team, Al bolted for Philly and we had to let Morris, Terry and Baynes go. Kemba, Edwards, Williams, Langford, Poirier, Green, Kanter and Tacko Fall. What a haul.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#94 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:31 am

Sucks losing Al to Philly, but them gifting us Edwards takes away the sting a little bit.
User avatar
Brett43
Junior
Posts: 481
And1: 170
Joined: Jul 19, 2006

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Strus, Tacko 

Post#95 » by Brett43 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 4:28 pm

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that Edwards is not going anywhere.

I don't want to jinx it by saying anything more.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,084
And1: 61,400
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Tacko 

Post#96 » by Parliament10 » Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:18 pm

Read on Twitter
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
Scarletfire81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,319
And1: 4,760
Joined: Jul 17, 2014
       

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Tacko 

Post#97 » by Scarletfire81 » Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:35 pm

I would rather have Waters on the roster over Wanamaker. Also I would keep Waters over Tacko as well.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Tacko 

Post#98 » by Darth Celtic » Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:41 pm

Scarletfire81 wrote:I would rather have Waters on the roster over Wanamaker. Also I would keep Waters over Tacko as well.

Waters is legit, but if we don't pick up a player after waivers or a trade, I kind of expect him to be signed before the playoffs at expense of Wannaaverage.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,378
And1: 7,677
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Tacko 

Post#99 » by cloverleaf » Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:00 pm

Scarletfire81 wrote:I would rather have Waters on the roster over Wanamaker. Also I would keep Waters over Tacko as well.


But the C's can convert either of them to a regular contract any time they have or make the space and decide to do so, no?
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,084
And1: 61,400
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Rookieville – Langford, G. Williams, Edwards, Waters, Tacko 

Post#100 » by Parliament10 » Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:03 pm

cloverleaf wrote:
Scarletfire81 wrote:I would rather have Waters on the roster over Wanamaker. Also I would keep Waters over Tacko as well.


But the C's can convert either of them to a regular contract any time they have or make the space and decide to do so, no?

Correct.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum

Return to Boston Celtics