ImageImageImage

The big man rotation

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,337
And1: 61,693
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#81 » by Parliament10 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 6:14 am

Think we get any Big-Men (Trade or after)?
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
ThePigeon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,790
And1: 2,909
Joined: Feb 25, 2004
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#82 » by ThePigeon » Thu Feb 6, 2025 9:52 am

Parliament10 wrote:Think we get any Big-Men (Trade or after)?


I don't think so
Barring any injury we are set with KP, Al, Kornet and Queta in a pinch
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,703
And1: 31,247
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#83 » by 31to6 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 5:26 pm

ThePigeon wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:Think we get any Big-Men (Trade or after)?


I don't think so
Barring any injury we are set with KP, Al, Kornet and Queta in a pinch


Plus Watson, and (in 6th place) Tillman:)
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,337
And1: 61,693
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#84 » by Parliament10 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 5:38 pm

31to6 wrote:
ThePigeon wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:Think we get any Big-Men (Trade or after)?


I don't think so
Barring any injury we are set with KP, Al, Kornet and Queta in a pinch


Plus Watson, and (in 6th place) Tillman:)

Watson is getting more playing time than Tillman. I could see Watson coming up to the NBA.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,263
And1: 20,703
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#85 » by djFan71 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 11:49 pm

Theis for sentimental, if not basketball, reasons could be an option. Doubt it happens though.
MrGreenRunsDeep
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,777
And1: 1,792
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
       

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#86 » by MrGreenRunsDeep » Fri Feb 7, 2025 2:19 am

Kornet is a Bum! He is useless! Quetta is much better
Just a Fan From Toronto Canada who Loves the Boston Celtics & Toronto Raptors!
Image
bigfoot_cryptozoology
Head Coach
Posts: 6,369
And1: 5,697
Joined: Jun 21, 2002

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#87 » by bigfoot_cryptozoology » Fri Feb 7, 2025 2:30 am

djFan71 wrote:Theis for sentimental, if not basketball, reasons could be an option. Doubt it happens though.


Theis has to be an upgrade over the semi-useless Tillman and limited Queta...
User avatar
Deivork
Veteran
Posts: 2,771
And1: 2,490
Joined: Apr 26, 2013

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#88 » by Deivork » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:42 am

The Tillman thing, I never understood
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,159
And1: 14,711
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#89 » by Marvel » Fri Feb 7, 2025 8:35 am

Deivork wrote:The Theis thing, I never understood

Fixed
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 3,365
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#90 » by Jammer » Fri Feb 7, 2025 10:01 am

Deivork wrote:The Tillman thing, I never understood


Tillman is the only player who'd qualify as a Banger, meaning physical type, of all the Celtic C's and PF's.

So, he is their only bruiser, even if less skilled than Baylor Scheierman.

So, that's why they got him. But he's pretty much useless on offense other than pick setting, since he's too slow to roll and can't hit a pick & pop, so Tillman is effectively unplayable at this point. But I think the reasoning was to add a Bruiser when they got him.
User avatar
VeryMuchWoke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,979
And1: 8,111
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Location: All Around
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#91 » by VeryMuchWoke » Fri Feb 7, 2025 11:14 am

Jammer wrote:
Deivork wrote:The Tillman thing, I never understood


Tillman is the only player who'd qualify as a Banger, meaning physical type, of all the Celtic C's and PF's.

So, he is their only bruiser, even if less skilled than Baylor Scheierman.

So, that's why they got him. But he's pretty much useless on offense other than pick setting, since he's too slow to roll and can't hit a pick & pop, so Tillman is effectively unplayable at this point. But I think the reasoning was to add a Bruiser when they got him.


He was a really good switch defender and they probably hoped he could eventually hit threes.
"Danny Ainge needs to shut the **** up and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner when he was playing, and I know that because I coached against him."
Pat Riley
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,768
And1: 17,193
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#92 » by Fierce1 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 11:23 am

VeryMuchWoke wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Deivork wrote:The Tillman thing, I never understood


Tillman is the only player who'd qualify as a Banger, meaning physical type, of all the Celtic C's and PF's.

So, he is their only bruiser, even if less skilled than Baylor Scheierman.

So, that's why they got him. But he's pretty much useless on offense other than pick setting, since he's too slow to roll and can't hit a pick & pop, so Tillman is effectively unplayable at this point. But I think the reasoning was to add a Bruiser when they got him.


He was a really good switch defender and they probably hoped he could eventually hit threes.

That can still happen.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 3,365
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#93 » by Jammer » Fri Feb 7, 2025 11:51 am

VeryMuchWoke wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Deivork wrote:The Tillman thing, I never understood


Tillman is the only player who'd qualify as a Banger, meaning physical type, of all the Celtic C's and PF's.

So, he is their only bruiser, even if less skilled than Baylor Scheierman.

So, that's why they got him. But he's pretty much useless on offense other than pick setting, since he's too slow to roll and can't hit a pick & pop, so Tillman is effectively unplayable at this point. But I think the reasoning was to add a Bruiser when they got him.


He was a really good switch defender and they probably hoped he could eventually hit threes.


Excellent point & True.
phincsfan
Analyst
Posts: 3,567
And1: 2,976
Joined: May 27, 2024
   

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#94 » by phincsfan » Fri Feb 7, 2025 2:17 pm

I think XMan is definitely hobbled and playing him a ton may have hurt any possible chance of trading him when it came to passing the physical. So was Stevens and Joe keeping him on the bench hoping that a team would inquire? Now since a phone call wasn't made for him, maybe he magically starts to appear in games? Would have been nice to see that start last night but since they were playing from behind all night it wouldn't have made sense.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,337
And1: 61,693
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#95 » by Parliament10 » Sat Feb 8, 2025 9:13 pm

Is it possible that Tilman is still hampered by that off-season surgery?
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,694
And1: 24,563
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#96 » by playa-hater » Sun Feb 9, 2025 12:45 am

Parliament10 wrote:Is it possible that Tilman is still hampered by that off-season surgery?


No way he moves the Same this year as last year. He looks very heavy legged and slow. Last year he was surprising able to switch on quicker players often.
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
redslastlaugh
Analyst
Posts: 3,664
And1: 4,802
Joined: Aug 13, 2011
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#97 » by redslastlaugh » Sun Feb 9, 2025 4:09 pm

31to6 wrote:
ThePigeon wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:Think we get any Big-Men (Trade or after)?


I don't think so
Barring any injury we are set with KP, Al, Kornet and Queta in a pinch


Plus Watson, and (in 6th place) Tillman:)

I’d love to see Anton Watson for a few minutes.
The thing about drafting older rookies like Watson and Scheierman is that you should be able to play them spot minutes as a rookie. If you are 23 or 24, why do you need a full redshirt year in Maine?
Did you know, just a deep pull here, that Brian Shaw played 40 minutes a game in the playoffs his rookie year? Even Delonte West played 14 minutes per game in the Playoffs as a rook. I saw Ty Lue say over the 82 games he wants to get every rostered player some time so he, as coach, can see what he has, but also to generate lineup data for the analytics dept/backbench coaches…. And the Celtics don’t seem to care about that…

Anyway, play Anton Watson, is the point!
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,566
And1: 101,358
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#98 » by ConstableGeneva » Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:05 pm

Read on Twitter
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,566
And1: 101,358
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#99 » by ConstableGeneva » Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:52 pm

Optionality is good when you're likely to face different types of lineups in the postseason. Celtics can go double big (quite a few combos they can use) or go small and switchable esp now with the addition of Torrey Craig. Their starting lineup who will likely cover at least 18 mins per game in the playoffs is a single-big lineup already. Their main second unit which is usually led by Tatum already has Hauser, PP, and Horford. They can go big with the 5th guy (Kornet/Queta/Porzingis) or small (Craig/Holiday/White). Brown-led lineups usually contain more starters but can also go either way (big/small).
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,725
And1: 70,741
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: The big man rotation 

Post#100 » by Celts17Pride » Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:03 pm

ConstableGeneva wrote:Optionality is good when you're likely to face different types of lineups in the postseason. Celtics can go double big (quite a few combos they can use) or go small and switchable esp now with the addition of Torrey Craig. Their starting lineup who will likely cover at least 18 mins per game in the playoffs is a single-big lineup already. Their main second unit which is usually led by Tatum already has Hauser, PP, and Horford. They can go big with the 5th guy (Kornet/Queta/Porzingis) or small (Craig/Holiday/White). Brown-led lineups usually contain more starters but can also go either way (big/small).

Now just hope everyone stays healthy including Craig.

Return to Boston Celtics