ImageImageImage

Summer Trade/(OffSeason) Thread 2017

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,718
And1: 8,794
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#921 » by jmr07019 » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:50 am

Trying to put together a team that can beat the Warriors.....

4 team trade lol:

NYK gets: Brooklyn 18, Rozier, Zizic
NYK Trades: Porzingis

Minnii trades: 7 pick
Minni gets: Bradley and Crowder

Indy trades: Paul George
Indy gets: picks 7, Smart, Yabs, Boston 18, Memphis pick

Boston trades: Smart, Crowder, Bradley, Rozier, Yabs, Zizic, Boston 18, Memphis pick
Boston recieves: Paul George, Porzingis

Sign Hayward.

IT ~ Hayward ~ George ~ Horford ~ Porzingis
Fultz, Brown

We have size against them at the 2, 4 and 5. They're bigger at the 1 and 3. Still a great longterm outlook.
Show Love Spread Love
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,718
And1: 8,794
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#922 » by jmr07019 » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:03 am

Stadium5 wrote:1. Draft Fultz

2. Bradley & Crowder for Minny #7 pick

3. Package IT, #7, BKN 18 Pick for Porzingis

4. Sign Blake

Fultz/Rozier/Jackson
Brown/Smart
Porzingis
Blake/Yabusele
Horford/Zizic


wouldn't you prefer Hayward over Blake if you already had Porzingis and Horford?

Fultz / Rozier
Brown / Smart
Hayward / Brown
Horford / Yabs
Pozingis / Zizic
Show Love Spread Love
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,098
And1: 27,983
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#923 » by Fencer reregistered » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:06 am

jmr07019 wrote:
Stadium5 wrote:1. Draft Fultz

2. Bradley & Crowder for Minny #7 pick

3. Package IT, #7, BKN 18 Pick for Porzingis

4. Sign Blake

Fultz/Rozier/Jackson
Brown/Smart
Porzingis
Blake/Yabusele
Horford/Zizic


wouldn't you prefer Hayward over Blake if you already had Porzingis and Horford?

Fultz / Rozier
Brown / Smart
Hayward / Brown
Horford / Yabs
Pozingis / Zizic


Even ignoring the matter of the Porzingis overpay, who is IT traded to in that scenario? Short guards aren't good fits for the triangle.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
SparringPartner
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,765
And1: 972
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
     

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#924 » by SparringPartner » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:40 am

2Mas wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
dlaflare wrote:
Smart? Gotta include him. He is going no where (I hope).



I'm hoping he does.

I'm not a "Smart" lover, but i wouldn't mind him staying on the team as a backup 1-2-3 type. Hustles, good team guy & if we can limit his offense i'd be real happy with him.

He's not what we were hoping for as a 6th pick, but if we keep IT & Fultz around, i think Smart can help them out a lot so i won't mind that as long as he knows his role & price reflects that.

Your not wanting Smart at all? Lol


What are you willing to pay Smart when the time comes?
Green_teamer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,293
And1: 3,040
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#925 » by Green_teamer » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:47 am

SparringPartner wrote:
2Mas wrote:
Edug27 wrote:

I'm hoping he does.

I'm not a "Smart" lover, but i wouldn't mind him staying on the team as a backup 1-2-3 type. Hustles, good team guy & if we can limit his offense i'd be real happy with him.

He's not what we were hoping for as a 6th pick, but if we keep IT & Fultz around, i think Smart can help them out a lot so i won't mind that as long as he knows his role & price reflects that.

Your not wanting Smart at all? Lol


What are you willing to pay Smart when the time comes?


Not op but i'd feel pretty good at about 12 million a year.
User avatar
SparringPartner
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,765
And1: 972
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
     

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#926 » by SparringPartner » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:55 am

Green_teamer wrote:
SparringPartner wrote:
2Mas wrote: I'm not a "Smart" lover, but i wouldn't mind him staying on the team as a backup 1-2-3 type. Hustles, good team guy & if we can limit his offense i'd be real happy with him.

He's not what we were hoping for as a 6th pick, but if we keep IT & Fultz around, i think Smart can help them out a lot so i won't mind that as long as he knows his role & price reflects that.

Your not wanting Smart at all? Lol


What are you willing to pay Smart when the time comes?


Not op but i'd feel pretty good at about 12 million a year.


I like that number. I wonder if teams will be willing to pay him more. With all this talent potentially coming aboard I think Smarts role stays the same or decreases. I am a big Smart fan, but he needs to take the next step.
Green_teamer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,293
And1: 3,040
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
         

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#927 » by Green_teamer » Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:02 am

SparringPartner wrote:
Green_teamer wrote:
SparringPartner wrote:
What are you willing to pay Smart when the time comes?


Not op but i'd feel pretty good at about 12 million a year.


I like that number. I wonder if teams will be willing to pay him more. With all this talent potentially coming aboard I think Smarts role stays the same or decreases. I am a big Smart fan, but he needs to take the next step.


I'd be curious at his value around the league as well. I can't see him getting much more than 12. Maybe someone gives him 15 but I can't see anyone paying him close to 20. If he somehow finds a jump shot between now and then things could change quick but until then he's kinda stuck inrole player territory as much as I like smart. A good role player but a role player none the less.
dlaflare
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 06, 2017

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#928 » by dlaflare » Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:14 am

Green_teamer wrote:
SparringPartner wrote:
Green_teamer wrote:
Not op but i'd feel pretty good at about 12 million a year.


I like that number. I wonder if teams will be willing to pay him more. With all this talent potentially coming aboard I think Smarts role stays the same or decreases. I am a big Smart fan, but he needs to take the next step.


I'd be curious at his value around the league as well. I can't see him getting much more than 12. Maybe someone gives him 15 but I can't see anyone paying him close to 20. If he somehow finds a jump shot between now and then things could change quick but until then he's kinda stuck inrole player territory as much as I like smart. A good role player but a role player none the less.



So, wait, you guys are sold on this being all Marcus Smart will be? He is still only 23 years old. He averaged 11/5/4 + 1.5 stls per game.



User avatar
SparringPartner
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,765
And1: 972
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
     

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#929 » by SparringPartner » Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:40 am

dlaflare wrote:
Green_teamer wrote:
SparringPartner wrote:
I like that number. I wonder if teams will be willing to pay him more. With all this talent potentially coming aboard I think Smarts role stays the same or decreases. I am a big Smart fan, but he needs to take the next step.


I'd be curious at his value around the league as well. I can't see him getting much more than 12. Maybe someone gives him 15 but I can't see anyone paying him close to 20. If he somehow finds a jump shot between now and then things could change quick but until then he's kinda stuck inrole player territory as much as I like smart. A good role player but a role player none the less.



So, wait, you guys are sold on this being all Marcus Smart will be? He is still only 23 years old. He averaged 11/5/4 + 1.5 stls per game.





I hope not. I just think if Hayward's coming aboard, Fultz gets drafted, Brown had a good year, someone's going to have to take a step back. I personally love Smart as a basketball player, but I also consider myself a realist.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
2Mas
Head Coach
Posts: 7,263
And1: 4,054
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#930 » by 2Mas » Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:52 am

I'd rather pay Smart his 10-12 then Bradley his 18-20 next summer. Give IT his money. Hopefully we get GH.

I think Bradley is the more obvious choice to go over Smart


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 9,022
And1: 7,676
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#931 » by cl2117 » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:11 am

I'd love to move up from #37 high enough to take a flyer on Giles. I don't feel like it's realistic because he feels like the prototype of a late riser (considered a top pick before injuries, now healthy), but I'd love to try.

If he finds himself out of the lottery do you think there are any teams that would take some combination of #37, #53, #56, Rozier, Mickey, D. Jackson so that we can move up 15-20 spots to take a shot on him?

I also like Bam Adebayo and Ike Anigbogu, but I don't think I'd trade up to get either (other than maybe trading all 3 of our seconds for whatever pick they're still available at).

Any chance Milwaukee (#17), Indiana (#18), Portland (#20), OKC (#21) would be tempted by something around #37 and Rozier with some filler thrown in on top?
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,793
And1: 70,848
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#932 » by Celts17Pride » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:04 pm

cl2117 wrote:I'd love to move up from #37 high enough to take a flyer on Giles. I don't feel like it's realistic because he feels like the prototype of a late riser (considered a top pick before injuries, now healthy), but I'd love to try.

If he finds himself out of the lottery do you think there are any teams that would take some combination of #37, #53, #56, Rozier, Mickey, D. Jackson so that we can move up 15-20 spots to take a shot on him?

I also like Bam Adebayo and Ike Anigbogu, but I don't think I'd trade up to get either (other than maybe trading all 3 of our seconds for whatever pick they're still available at).

Any chance Milwaukee (#17), Indiana (#18), Portland (#20), OKC (#21) would be tempted by something around #37 and Rozier with some filler thrown in on top?

Giles is going to be a late lottery pick because of his upside and because after about 10 picks this draft drops off dramatically.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#933 » by Homerclease » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:08 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
cl2117 wrote:I'd love to move up from #37 high enough to take a flyer on Giles. I don't feel like it's realistic because he feels like the prototype of a late riser (considered a top pick before injuries, now healthy), but I'd love to try.

If he finds himself out of the lottery do you think there are any teams that would take some combination of #37, #53, #56, Rozier, Mickey, D. Jackson so that we can move up 15-20 spots to take a shot on him?

I also like Bam Adebayo and Ike Anigbogu, but I don't think I'd trade up to get either (other than maybe trading all 3 of our seconds for whatever pick they're still available at).

Any chance Milwaukee (#17), Indiana (#18), Portland (#20), OKC (#21) would be tempted by something around #37 and Rozier with some filler thrown in on top?

Giles is going to be a late lottery pick because of his upside and because after about 10 picks this draft drops off dramatically.

Agree with this. Around pick 9 is when it really starts to take a hit depending on how you feel about Markkanen and Ntilikina. Baffles me why Miles Bridges went back to school when he would've been superb value around this slot
galipeautim
Rookie
Posts: 1,082
And1: 498
Joined: Feb 22, 2016
     

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#934 » by galipeautim » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:20 pm

If I'm the Cavs my #1 agenda this offseason is to trade for Avery Bradley. The formula to beat the Dubs is defense and shooting and that is exactly what Bradley brings to the table. Would the Celtics ever make that move with a rival and what would it require is another story.
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 21,217
And1: 10,097
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: RE: Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#935 » by KGboss » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:29 pm

galipeautim wrote:If I'm the Cavs my #1 agenda this offseason is to trade for Avery Bradley. The formula to beat the Dubs is defense and shooting and that is exactly what Bradley brings to the table. Would the Celtics ever make that move with a rival and what would it require is another story.

But what do the Cavs have to offer the Celtics? Kevin Love? I dont think that scenario makes sense.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#936 » by ddb » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:36 pm

why a Fultz, Hayward, Love, Zizic offseason could happen.

The first part is easy. Celts have the #1 pick. Draft Fultz

The 2nd part could be easy as well. Sign Hayward in free agency. Bring Zizic over as planned

Bradley/Crowder for Love is the next step. Cavs may prefer Melo over Bradley/Crowder which could be done still via a 3 team deal

you can knock Love all you want, but at the end of the day he's still a 20/11 All-Star PF in his prime. No, he isn't much of a defender, but he rebounds and stretches the floor at an elite level which fits in seamlessly with what the Celtics do.

IT-Smart-Hayward-Love-Horford
Fultz-Rozier-Brown-FA-Zizic

not a bad plan. Plus we keep the BK18
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,793
And1: 70,848
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#937 » by Celts17Pride » Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:42 pm

ddb wrote:Bradley/Crowder for Love is the next step.


I would pass on this trade and here is the reason why. Part of Cleveland's issue with Golden State and part of why Boston has had success against GS is wing defense. Cleveland doesn't have the wings to play defense against Golden State.

If the Celtics move players like Bradley, Crowder, Smart etc. for Kevin Love it's like we are acquiring Cleveland's problem in my opinion.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#938 » by ddb » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:04 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
ddb wrote:Bradley/Crowder for Love is the next step.


I would pass on this trade and here is the reason why. Part of Cleveland's issue with Golden State and part of why Boston has had success against GS is wing defense. Cleveland doesn't have the wings to play defense against Golden State.

If the Celtics move players like Bradley, Crowder, Smart etc. for Kevin Love it's like we are acquiring Cleveland's problem in my opinion.


So I agree with you to a certain extent, but here's my rebuttal. Danny Ainge cannot possibly sign a max, or near max FA this summer PLUS resign IT, AB & Smart next summer. The tax bill would be ridiculous.
Secondly, if the Celtics draft Fultz AND sign Hayward, that's a minimum of 60 minutes out the door that would normally go to guys like Bradley & Crowder.

Fultz/Hayward > Bradley/Crowder. Especially, if you add Love into the equation and it's essentially Fultz/Hayward/Love VS Bradley/Crowder. Celtics would still have Marcus Smart as a shut down defender.

So this is all in theory. Technically, we probably wouldnt want to send both Crowder & Bradley to the Cavs to join LeBron & Kyrie. That's a great mix of players...

Kyrie-Bradley-Crowder-LeBron-Thompson is a great lineup

but in theory, Love at the price of Bradley/Crowder, especially if Bradley isn't in the long-term plans, is a fair deal that would make sense for both Boston and Cleveland.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#939 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:34 pm

ddb wrote:why a Fultz, Hayward, Love, Zizic offseason could happen.

The first part is easy. Celts have the #1 pick. Draft Fultz

The 2nd part could be easy as well. Sign Hayward in free agency. Bring Zizic over as planned

Bradley/Crowder for Love is the next step. Cavs may prefer Melo over Bradley/Crowder which could be done still via a 3 team deal

you can knock Love all you want, but at the end of the day he's still a 20/11 All-Star PF in his prime. No, he isn't much of a defender, but he rebounds and stretches the floor at an elite level which fits in seamlessly with what the Celtics do.

IT-Smart-Hayward-Love-Horford
Fultz-Rozier-Brown-FA-Zizic

not a bad plan. Plus we keep the BK18


I had a similar idea - draft Fultz, max Hayward, then see what happens if you stack Bradley, Crowder, Rozier, YABU and/or the 37th pick (not on the rookie salary scale, could get some of the MLE) to match salary. My idea was Drummond - the Smash Brother for the Splash Brothers. But you could theoretically get Love, or Drummond, or Deandre, or get Melo and then flip him for Blake.

You can't overrate Bradley and Crowder for sentimental reasons. Dealing them as a pair does them right, so you're not sending Jae to Sacramento to languish. We can't pay IT and Avery and Smart. And Smart, Fultz and Brown can all play some 2, so Bradley is the loss you can replace the most painlessly.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Summer Trade Thread 2017 

Post#940 » by ddb » Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:42 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
ddb wrote:why a Fultz, Hayward, Love, Zizic offseason could happen.

The first part is easy. Celts have the #1 pick. Draft Fultz

The 2nd part could be easy as well. Sign Hayward in free agency. Bring Zizic over as planned

Bradley/Crowder for Love is the next step. Cavs may prefer Melo over Bradley/Crowder which could be done still via a 3 team deal

you can knock Love all you want, but at the end of the day he's still a 20/11 All-Star PF in his prime. No, he isn't much of a defender, but he rebounds and stretches the floor at an elite level which fits in seamlessly with what the Celtics do.

IT-Smart-Hayward-Love-Horford
Fultz-Rozier-Brown-FA-Zizic

not a bad plan. Plus we keep the BK18




I had a similar idea - draft Fultz, max Hayward, then see what happens if you stack Bradley, Crowder, Rozier, YABU and/or the 37th pick (not on the rookie salary scale, could get some of the MLE) to match salary. My idea was Drummond - the Smash Brother for the Splash Brothers. But you could theoretically get Love, or Drummond, or Deandre, or get Melo and then flip him for Blake.

You can't overrate Bradley and Crowder for sentimental reasons. Dealing them as a pair does them right, so you're not sending Jae to Sacramento to languish. We can't pay IT and Avery and Smart. And Smart, Fultz and Brown can all play some 2, so Bradley is the loss you can replace the most painlessly.


I'm not a big Drummond fan. We would need a bunch of shooting around him to make it work. It could work, but I struggle to see the fit here

Return to Boston Celtics