redslastlaugh wrote:Hal14 wrote:I don't see us drafting 2 guys in the top 32 picks. Even if we trim some payroll this summer, we're still going to be contenders and it's hard for rookies to get mins on a contender. So it's better to just draft 1 of them that high. 
I also doubt we make both picks, 28 and 31. I dont think that's because contenders just dont have time for 2-3 rookies in general. Lots of contenders prioritize minutes for their young guys. 
You look at the Spurs with Kawhi, Tiago Splitter, Patty Mills, etc. The Spurs teams always had 2-3 rookies every year. You look at OKC and how many rookies, second- and third year players are in their rotation. You look at the playoff minutes Christian Braun and Peyton Watson have got on Denver earlier in their careers. Even the Doc Rivers Celtics found minutes Rondo, Powe, Big Baby & Avery Bradley in year 1 or 2...
I think Brad has a strong opinion about the risk/return of players drafted outside the top of the draft and he doesnt think the juice is worth the squeeze for the average guy drafted in the 20s, 30s, 40s etc... he doesnt hold it against a guy like Derrick, Brogdon about not being drafted high once theyve developed into a proven contributor, but I dont think he wants to put his eggs into the basket of guys picked 28 or 32. And when you look at his coaching experience, all those guys Danny drafted in that range either did nothing (RJ Hunter, Jordan Mickey) or did very little their first couple of years (Rob, PP)...
I bet we do a deal like we did with the Desmond Bane pick. We used the asset of #30 to clear Kanters cap number and get two future 2nds... this could the fate of #28 and Xavier Tillman contract...
 
 Although I'd like to see some fresh talent infusion this year, the 2 pick scenario evades me as well. There just isn't the space, with 14 on the roster and a few prospects in the Maine pipeline. 
To me, it looks like Davison, Tillman, Walsh, and maybe Peterson are on the bubble. 
Does the team intend to further develop Davison? Give him a contract? Or can they find another player in the draft that will slot into that pipeline and get more return in the future for backcourt bench help? Labaron Philon. Boogie Fland. Kam Jones as examples. If not a firm upgrade, why not stick with guy with 3 years of experience? Jones could probably step in quickly with his experience, but the bench shooting is pretty crowded now with the emergence of Scheierman.
As pg/sg is not a big need yet, if only one pick is used, I'd rather find a more athletic tweener 4/5 to maybe replace Tillman eventually, someone that can fill some floor time for Tatum and Horford. Yaxel Lendeborg looks like an absolute specimen. He may be ready to contribute. Not sure what the upside is, but he has an NBA body already and seems like a solid guy for that 4/5 role. JT Toppin as well, although he doesn't seem to be talked about as much as last year.
As for Walsh, like Davison he's also still very young. It makes no sense to draft a guy like that and then move on after two years of development. He could really blossom next year. OTOH, he looks out of place standing in the corner waiting for threes. He can't really initiate the offense like Scheierman can. We haven't really seen the disruptive defender in him, and probably won't until we see more of the 3 in 3&D from him.
Since Toppin came for work outs last year (and I recall the team liked him? Not sure) I'd be happy with him or Lendeborg with the one pick as our new athletic defensive big and then trade the other pick. If Brad thinks the staff can handle another young prospect to develop, Labaron Philon could be a nice find with that other pick this year. Dude is giving me some Derrick White lite vibes. He's got good length with a skinny frame at 6'4", could be a nice backcourt addition with acouple years of patience.
TLDR; I doubt the C's use both picks, but I would like to see Philon and Lendeborg selected if the team can add two players to the development pipeline.