flintsky21 wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Yeah, trading Jaylen Brown for addition by subtraction is just crazy talk.
I personally disagree. I just keep remembering how much better the offense and ball movement looked in those games that JB missed last year. Because he's such a high usage player, it actually prevents us from maximizing the impact of our best player, which is Tatum, because then Tatum turns into a spectator whenever JB is hunting for his offense. I'm not advocating for Tatum to be taking all the shots, but the offense should run through him at least 90% of the time he's on the floor, and not 50% because JB has to have his 40%.
It's similar to the White-Smart dynamic. We were never gonna be able to maximize White to the best version that he can be (the one that won POTW) because Smart, as the heart and soul of the team, just HAD to be the team's primary PG.
Watching the Nets get a gentleman sweep of Celtics with Tatum looking amazing sucked. I don’t care if the ball movement is less pretty. I’ll take deep runs in the playoffs every day and that is what we get with Brown. The Celtics agree which is why they are going to pay 305 million dollars to keep him in green.
Brown/Tatum weren’t enough so Brad needs to add not subtract. So Brad addressed our biggest needs - front court scoring/length and a replacement for an aging Al Horford.