Fencer reregistered wrote:itrsteve wrote:I am committed to find something I like about Baylor Schierman this game.
How did that work out for you?
Maybe better luck next game.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Fencer reregistered wrote:itrsteve wrote:I am committed to find something I like about Baylor Schierman this game.
How did that work out for you?
itrsteve wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:itrsteve wrote:I am committed to find something I like about Baylor Schierman this game.
How did that work out for you?
Maybe better luck next game.
ThePigeon wrote:itrsteve wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:
How did that work out for you?
Maybe better luck next game.
Patience
Nesmith all over again. Same with Walsh
They both need consistent playing time and some more experience
Would I prefer Filipowsky? Of course. But this is what we have and we should at least let them get some experience
Gant wrote:Queta only played 7 minutes, but it was eye opening compared to the last game. He was moving crisply on both ends. He was sharp with his rolls, quick with his feet, and aggressively grabbing the ball on rebounds. It's almost like he got pulled to put that in amber.
Boucher's the spiritual wise vet for this group. He pairs well with everyone and fills in where they're weakest. What an important signing. X talked before the game how he's learning the forward position from watching him. https://bsky.app/profile/bobbykrivitsky.bsky.social/post/3m2z7d5sv7k2p
Minott can freakin' play.
Hauser looked great. His lone downside continues though: after grabbing one rebound in 18 minutes in the first game, he grabbed one rebound in 17 minutes in this one.
Simons is starting to show his formidable offensive sparkle. With Tatum out, he's a guy you can hand the ball to get a crucial bucket against anyone. His defense against first line players is still to be seen.
Fun game for Brown, as he backed off from shooting and turned himself into a playmaker.
The competition has been low level in all three exhibitions. Toronto supposedly is playing their guys in the next one.
The pace is great. The defensive rebounding is not. Going forward, those two factors plus turnover rate will determine this team.
Did anyone see Joe Mazzulla's postgame press conference? He's a madman, and I say that with all affection. Gary Washburn had a story about that today. Here's the presser:
Fierce1 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:Yes, Simons was better. He's the functional equivalent of a 6-3 Sam Hauser on offense, except that Hauser shoots off the catch, while Simons shoots off the dribble. But the ball goes in in either case. Defensively Simons held his own against Cleveland's third string players.
There's just no way you can say he's an equivalent to Hauser.
Simons is more than just a shooter on offense.
Don't forget Simons is a former slam dunk champion.
That means Simons is an above the rim player
Sam is just a specialist, a pure 3pt shooter.
He even struggles dunking the ball.
Simons is also a scorer, averaged 20+ ppg in 2023 and 2024.
Sam has yet to average 10 ppg in his NBA career.
So it's apples and oranges.
DusterBuster wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:Yes, Simons was better. He's the functional equivalent of a 6-3 Sam Hauser on offense, except that Hauser shoots off the catch, while Simons shoots off the dribble. But the ball goes in in either case. Defensively Simons held his own against Cleveland's third string players.
There's just no way you can say he's an equivalent to Hauser.
Simons is more than just a shooter on offense.
Don't forget Simons is a former slam dunk champion.
That means Simons is an above the rim player
Sam is just a specialist, a pure 3pt shooter.
He even struggles dunking the ball.
Simons is also a scorer, averaged 20+ ppg in 2023 and 2024.
Sam has yet to average 10 ppg in his NBA career.
So it's apples and oranges.
As someone who watched Simons for 6 years, he's not an above the rim player. Early in his career he really showed off his athleticism and certainly isn't bad there, but he rarely rarely dunks in games or plays above the rim.
tfribs45 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:Fierce1 wrote:There's just no way you can say he's an equivalent to Hauser.
Simons is more than just a shooter on offense.
Don't forget Simons is a former slam dunk champion.
That means Simons is an above the rim player
Sam is just a specialist, a pure 3pt shooter.
He even struggles dunking the ball.
Simons is also a scorer, averaged 20+ ppg in 2023 and 2024.
Sam has yet to average 10 ppg in his NBA career.
So it's apples and oranges.
As someone who watched Simons for 6 years, he's not an above the rim player. Early in his career he really showed off his athleticism and certainly isn't bad there, but he rarely rarely dunks in games or plays above the rim.
regardless, Simons > Hauser and could easily be the C's starting Shooting guard. If not, he seems like a solid 6th man option. I think the C's keep him around, time will tell.....
Gant wrote:Hauser shot 11 free throws all last season. Simons shot 15 in one game.
Red2 wrote:Baylor takes some bad shots and he cant bring the ball up against pressure. He’s a good passer and rebounder for his size but his shooting has been poor so far
ThePigeon wrote:itrsteve wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:
How did that work out for you?
Maybe better luck next game.
Patience
Nesmith all over again. Same with Walsh
They both need consistent playing time and some more experience
Would I prefer Filipowsky? Of course. But this is what we have and we should at least let them get some experience
ParticleMan wrote:assessment through three preseason games:
Stock up:
- Boucher: Starter-caliber, plays fast and aggressive, obvious guy to hold tatum's spot.
- Minott: Solid rotation player, decent skills, incredible motor, good fundamentals.
- Gonzalez: Great feel for the game at his age, impacts the floor on both ends.
- Garza: I was expecting a towel waver but his activity and screens makes him a playable backup.
Stock flat:
- Pritch, Simons, Hauser: Doin' what they do, good to see them in regular season form.
- Williams, Shulga: Maine-bound long-term projects, as expected.
Stock down:
- JB: Need to see more creation, better ball control, better decisions. Same old is not good enough.
- Queta: Still inconsistent, still fouling too much. Another guys who needs to step up but hasn't looked any better.
- Tillman: Great guy to root for but he got nothing left, unless he suddenly starts nailing 3's at 40%.
- Walsh: Poor man's version of Minott/Boucher/Hugo, not clear he has a role on this team. End of the bench.
- Scheierman: Easily the biggest disappointment. Golden opportunity to own a rotation slot and instead has screwed the pooch.
Starters: JB, White, Boucher, PP, Queta
Rotation: Hauser, Simons, Minott, Gonzalez, Garza
Deep bench: Tillman, Baylor, Walsh, 2-ways.
Curmudgeon wrote:Simons hasn't looked good. He was terrible in his first game, decent in the second. Simons is a shooter. If his three balls didn't go in consistently he would be out of the league. It's the same for Hauser, although Hauser is 6-8 and can get a rebound once in awhile. Simons is 6-3 and although they list him at 200 lbs he looks more like 180 soaking wet.
They are both in the game to shoot and you just hope they won't embarrass themselves on defense or by turning the ball over.