sam_I_am wrote:DusterBuster wrote:FlatearthZorro wrote:
Nope. Not at all, both are worse players than Hayward at 70% if he can come back to that I'm comfortable with keeping Hayward. We need playmakers, I like Hayward more as a point forward than Turner, even. We will see tho. No idea if Danny dumps him or not. It might be likely at this point.
The idea obviously isn't about getting Boston equal player value, it's about getting them out of Haywards deal early so they can retool the roster faster.
That said, you're also selling both guys a bit short. Harkless is a high level defender for the Blazers, he's just inconsistent offensively. And Turner is well Turner, but he's had a lot of success in Boston before, so I don't see why Stevens couldn't replicate that again.
Hayward is an expiring deal. He will opt out. He was good enough in last month of season and without Kyrie and Horford here will assert himself. There is no need to take other teams trash to “get out”. Just an illogical idea.
The reason to trade him is that we have 3 really good SFs and only need 2 and now have big holes to fill at C, PF and PG.
The only thing that's illogical is the idea of Hayward opting out of over 30million dollars.... He's not getting that level of money ever again. He'd be insane to opt out of that.