BostonCouchGM wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:JHTruth wrote:
It's sort of like QBs int he NFL. Every year is supposed to be a "weak" QB draft it seems then the combine starts happening and guys start throwing the ball 80 yds and all the teams that need a QB start saying it's actually a good draft for QBs and 4 go on the first 10 picks. Never changes..
The 2016 draft is kind of the perfect example of this. It was supposed to be a 3 person draft between Simmons, Skal and Ingram. During the season Simmons separated himself and Skal played horrible so he fell. At the start of the season a lot of people were high on the draft, then by the middle of the season it was viewed as a horrible draft (which it was). But come the combine, Dunn was being talked about as the next Wade, Hield was Curry but bigger, Bender was better than Porzingis and so on. Drafts tend to get talked up at the start of the season and at the combine.
any draft class that includes Simmons, Ingram, Brown, Dunn, Jamal Murray, Sabonis, Prince, Hield, Siakam, Dejounte Murray, and Brogdon is a very solid draft. That's 11 above average starters. And then you have a slew of solid role players on top of that. This narrative that 2016 was a weak draft class is really played out and completely false. It's as strong as the previous 3 draft classes before it. Not excellent but definitely not horrible
And Yabusele.