BostonCouchGM wrote:Darth Celtic wrote:Hard to beat the Lakers offer but not because of players. Jb smart and timelord is better than the Lakers players traded. But look at those picks.
4 this year.
Unprotected first in 21 when LeBron is 37.
Pick swap in 22 when LeBron is 38.
Unprotected first I. 23 when LeBron is 39.
Pick swap in 24 at 40.
The Lakers have Ad and an aging LeBron with 5 players and 30 million in cap room to build a team. Almost no free agent or drat help for seven years. This might end up being the nets deal all over.
If we did that we were ****.
Sure. Add in Tatum instead and we give up a lot less picks than that. Still ****.
No wonder the owners vetoed it. Is was all in for AD but had no idea what they were going to get from the Lakers in picks and swaps.
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using RealGM mobile app
Unprotected first in 21 when LeBron is 37.
they'll be coming off a likely deep playoff run from 2020 so the pick should be in the high 20s
Pick swap in 22 when LeBron is 38.
they'll still have AD and the other FA they'll land in a couple of weeks and this pick should be in the 20s
Unprotected first I. 23 when LeBron is 39.
they'll still have AD and the other FA they'll land in a couple of weeks and this pick should be in the 20s
Pick swap in 24 at 40.
maybe a lottery pick by this time
JB, Smart and Williams is NOT better than the Lakers players. But subbing in Tatum for Williams would have been. And our future picks would have been as good if not better than the Lakers. Ainge could have beaten the deal. The difference obviously is that AD wanted LA and will re-sign so you can't fault Ainge for passing on this trade one bit.
Griffin is going to look like a fool with all those picks in the 20's. He's off to a poor start in the quest to keep Zion.