ImageImageImage

Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman

brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 12,984
And1: 8,285
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
     

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1881 » by brackdan70 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:53 am

CSL_1904 wrote:
rd26 wrote:
winsomme2 wrote:Mannix just confirmed that Jaylen was front and center in the In-fighting on this team and with Kyrie.

I'd be willing to bet that he's also connected to the "Hayward gets treated different" complaints as well.

My gut tells me that he is just a sour grape and needs to go. We need to sell high on him cuz IMO he's close to his ceiling but is still potentially viewed as a player with a lot of room to grow around the league.


Personally, sounds like JB might have been the only guy in the organization with enough nads to tell KI to STFU. That includes the coach and GM.

If they had done what was best for the Celtics and spent less time on their knees for Kyrie, he would have been gone at the deadline.

If anything, this article makes me like JB more.

And Jaylen showed up in the playoffs, unlike most of the other players.

I really hope we don't trade Jaylen for a pick unless it 1 or 2. I don’t really feel anyone else in this draft has his ceiling or floor.

Edit: though I do like Jaylen I could understand trading him for 3 or 4. But anything lower than that seems a step down.
Sign here
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 37,631
And1: 89,861
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1882 » by zoyathedestroya » Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:59 am

I'd trade Brown for Zion straight up, if that's on the table. Just putting it out there.
cloverleaf
General Manager
Posts: 9,134
And1: 6,377
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1883 » by cloverleaf » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:08 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:I'd trade Brown for Zion straight up, if that's on the table. Just putting it out there.

Can't for a second imagine it would be--other than maybe Danny's nighttime dreams.
User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,935
And1: 11,410
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1884 » by greenroom31 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:10 pm

sam_I_am wrote:Does anyone believe there is anything behind Jaylen Brown trade rumors? Trading him for a top 4 pick does balance roster especially if team drafts Garland to play point and with Hayward healthy. Smart plus depth from Semi/?Herro would offset the loss somewhat. I personally would rather build with him than Hayward who could opt out next year, but I do get the vibe from him that he would ditch Boston for LA in a heartbeat.


I completely believe Jaylen is in play for the 3rd or 4th pick and agree with your entire post other than the last bit ("I do get the vibe from him that he would ditch Boston for LA in a heartbeat.") I'd also prefer to build around Jaylen and Tatum over Hayward and Tatum.

The thing with Jaylen is that I've heard enough about how he is difficult and a diva to believe that the Celtics would be open to trading him despite my personal belief in his potential as a player. The challenge is that a bunch of other teams seem to want to move up to 4 as Garland is increasingly getting recognized as the 4th potential jewel in this draft.

Atlanta, Minnesota, Chicago and more have been rumored to be seeking the #4 pick (although I suspect Atlanta would be moving up to take Hunter, not Garland since they already have Trae Young). We know at last #8 and #10 are on the table -- the question is what could we offer to beat that. Would likely have to be Jaylen + 20 or something along those lines and I'm not sure if Ainge would go that far. Will be interesting to who the pick is at #4 and how things play out tonight.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,546
And1: 7,971
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1885 » by Celtics_Champs » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:13 pm

Trading Brown for youth would be a really bad idea. I won’t **** on any of these players cause I do believe Danny has something up his sleeve to get to the up the draft. But trading JB because he told Kyrie off is not a good reason to trade someone. **** Kyrie, first of all. Second of all, I am not opposed to dealing him for a vet.
cloverleaf
General Manager
Posts: 9,134
And1: 6,377
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1886 » by cloverleaf » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:13 pm

Bohemian wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Just a hunch, I think we trade Jaylen to the Knicks.. they make more sense than any of the other top teams, I can see them wanting a sure thing with a high floor, instead of the risk of Barrett or Garland..



It makes sense. But it is rare that we trade with the Knicks, right? I don´t remember the last time we did business together.


Would be some kind of karma if Kyrie signed with the Knicks--to be reunited with JB.
cloverleaf
General Manager
Posts: 9,134
And1: 6,377
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1887 » by cloverleaf » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:14 pm

Bohemian wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Just a hunch, I think we trade Jaylen to the Knicks.. they make more sense than any of the other top teams, I can see them wanting a sure thing with a high floor, instead of the risk of Barrett or Garland..



It makes sense. But it is rare that we trade with the Knicks, right? I don´t remember the last time we did business together.


Would be some kind of karma if Kyrie signed with the Knicks--to be reunited with JB.
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,429
And1: 8,974
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1888 » by sam_I_am » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:17 pm

sam_I_am wrote:Last second Hail Mary: Hayward/#14 to GS for Durant, resign Kyrie and Al. Would still be favorite in East while Durant sits depending on hits to Raptors, Bucks and Sixers. Getting delusional as draft approaches.....man this year has sucked.....except for Pats, Hoos, Sox and Bruins.


ESPN is taliking about GS signing Durant to 5 years with promise to trade so he can get extra 51 million. Would Kyrie resign for his 5 year max if Boston offered Hayward/Brown/Memphis pick for Durant? Would Durant agree to do it if both Al and Kyrie resigned?

Obviously not....but dreaming....
Darthlukey
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 4,718
And1: 3,151
Joined: Jan 16, 2013
         

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1889 » by Darthlukey » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:18 pm

Alright, I'm going to bed. I'm hoping to wake up to some awesome league news
WeLikeOurGuys
General Manager
Posts: 9,230
And1: 7,199
Joined: May 18, 2010
       

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1890 » by WeLikeOurGuys » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:18 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:I'd trade Brown for Zion straight up, if that's on the table. Just putting it out there.

Hell I’d even throw you Yabusele.
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,676
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1891 » by Prokorov » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:19 pm

cloverleaf wrote:Just a hunch, I think we trade Jaylen to the Knicks.. they make more sense than any of the other top teams, I can see them wanting a sure thing with a high floor, instead of the risk of Barrett or Garland.


Doesn't seem like something the knicks would do.... they would be more risk averse and also going for the higher offensive upside. they would also lose a couple years of control on a rookie deal and RJ would be shinier in a trade leading up to the regular season or in-season.

Value is there, but doesnt seem like it would fit the knicks or what they are looking to do.

knicks would be more like draft RJ Barrett, max a middle of the road guy like Middleton and then overpay juilius randle
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,429
And1: 8,974
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1892 » by sam_I_am » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:33 pm

Hayward/Brown/14 to Washington for Beal if he agrees to extension. Smart/Beal/Tatum has everything you need 1-3. Can still resign Rozier and Semi and use remaining picks for depth. Maybe can convince Al to come back.
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,676
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1893 » by Prokorov » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:38 pm

sam_I_am wrote:Hayward/Brown/14 to Washington for Beal if he agrees to extension. Smart/Beal/Tatum has everything you need 1-3. Can still resign Rozier and Semi and use remaining picks for depth. Maybe can convince Al to come back.


With wall on a supermax making 38-40 million a year I cant see the Wizards trading for heyward making 32M the next 2 seasons.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,944
And1: 3,776
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1894 » by BleedGreen1989 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:46 pm

Prokorov wrote:
sam_I_am wrote:Hayward/Brown/14 to Washington for Beal if he agrees to extension. Smart/Beal/Tatum has everything you need 1-3. Can still resign Rozier and Semi and use remaining picks for depth. Maybe can convince Al to come back.


With wall on a supermax making 38-40 million a year I cant see the Wizards trading for heyward making 32M the next 2 seasons.


Pretty much.

That and I just don’t think it’s enough value for Beal.
User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,935
And1: 11,410
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1895 » by greenroom31 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:47 pm

Dear Aron, thank you for opting in. Also:

Read on Twitter
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 37,631
And1: 89,861
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1896 » by zoyathedestroya » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:49 pm

AndHereWeGoJoker.gif

I wonder what we're using the cap space for. What's the urgency?
User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,935
And1: 11,410
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1897 » by greenroom31 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:51 pm

zoyathedestroya wrote:AndHereWeGoJoker.gif

I wonder what we're using the cap space for. What's the urgency?


Also wouldn't that be $33M of cap space, not $23M? With Al and Kyrie gone I think we're currently at just under $70M committed...
User avatar
aim2please
Starter
Posts: 2,129
And1: 3,255
Joined: Mar 16, 2013
Location: Ego highway
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1898 » by aim2please » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:51 pm

greenroom31 wrote:Dear Aron, thank you for opting in. Also:

Read on Twitter


Lets stop acting like Baynes had offers higher than $5.5m. Nice guy, hope he finds a place he can play.
User avatar
ILC
Starter
Posts: 2,298
And1: 1,918
Joined: Apr 15, 2014
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1899 » by ILC » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:52 pm

What happened to the promise he won't be traded? And why the rush now to create more space?
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Redemption. Water into wine....rondo is Jesus
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Celtics General Offseason Thread, 2019 – Welcome to the Party, #2 

Post#1900 » by SmartWentCrazy » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:53 pm

Prokorov wrote:
cloverleaf wrote:Just a hunch, I think we trade Jaylen to the Knicks.. they make more sense than any of the other top teams, I can see them wanting a sure thing with a high floor, instead of the risk of Barrett or Garland.


Doesn't seem like something the knicks would do.... they would be more risk averse and also going for the higher offensive upside. they would also lose a couple years of control on a rookie deal and RJ would be shinier in a trade leading up to the regular season or in-season.

Value is there, but doesnt seem like it would fit the knicks or what they are looking to do.

knicks would be more like draft RJ Barrett, max a middle of the road guy like Middleton and then overpay juilius randle


The only thing that makes me feel like theyre trying to move the pick is that theyre leaking like crazy about Garland— feels like theyre really trying to drum up trade interest in the pick.

Return to Boston Celtics