ImageImageImage

Romeo Langford Thread

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 19,158
And1: 27,999
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#781 » by 31to6 » Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:54 am

Romeo needs to get his driving game going.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
JediMasterRevan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,856
And1: 1,047
Joined: Nov 06, 2020

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#782 » by JediMasterRevan » Sat Apr 24, 2021 1:00 pm

return2glory wrote:Instead of showing signs of getting better, Romeo is looking more and more like a wasted pick.

He had managed to score 4 points in his last 3 games as a starter. 2 of those points was a lucky tip in.

Romeo, Nesmith, Grant and Semi are trash. It’s sad.

Pritchard is the only bright spot in the last few years of Danny’s picks.



Nesmith hasnt had enough of a chance to prove he is trash.


Romeo is just a role player 10-12 minutes a night guy
Grant is a 5-8 minutes guy

Semi shouldnt be in the nba
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 8,504
And1: 6,996
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#783 » by cl2117 » Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:41 pm

JediMasterRevan wrote:
return2glory wrote:Instead of showing signs of getting better, Romeo is looking more and more like a wasted pick.

He had managed to score 4 points in his last 3 games as a starter. 2 of those points was a lucky tip in.

Romeo, Nesmith, Grant and Semi are trash. It’s sad.

Pritchard is the only bright spot in the last few years of Danny’s picks.



Nesmith hasnt had enough of a chance to prove he is trash.


Romeo is just a role player 10-12 minutes a night guy
Grant is a 5-8 minutes guy

Semi shouldnt be in the nba

Romeo hasn't had enough of a chance either. He's only got about 10 games under his belt in his sophomore season. He's probably still only a role plyae at best, but don't see him as a right off yet.

Defensively he's been good. Offensively he's just not 3 &D, he's more Tony Allen cutting/slashing and D, but he's not playing with any true facilitators nor does he have a chance to play on ball. If we had pass first PG like CP3/Rondo/Rubio think he'd look better on that end of the floor since he moves well.

Nesmith is basically red-shirting. Grant and Semi are filler guys for lottery teams. They'll have more contracts in the NBA, but you won't hear their names ever.

Edwards/Waters are G-league.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 63,882
And1: 62,928
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#784 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Apr 24, 2021 5:22 pm

Celtics need more from Romeo Langford or he will be unplayable in the playoffs. Can’t have someone on the floor that the defense completely ignores. Romeo’s defense is not good enough to make up for his total zero on offense. Romeo has about 12 games to figure it out
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#785 » by Bleeding Green » Sat Apr 24, 2021 5:57 pm

ParticleMan wrote:since tatum, ainge's drafting has been decidedly subpar.

brad's not doing him any favors tho by requiring every draft pick become a defensive specialist before they can get minutes. i appreciate brad's thinking, but offense matters too. romeo for instance seems to have forgotten how to score.

How so? Redraft the 2018 and 2019 drafts. Ainge's picks go higher in a redraft. I'd say redraft 2020 too, but too early for that; all I know if that Pritchard isn't going 26th if they redo it in a couple years.

But yeah, if you compare the last three drafts to the one where he dunked all over the entire league, I guess they don't look that great.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
JediMasterRevan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,856
And1: 1,047
Joined: Nov 06, 2020

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#786 » by JediMasterRevan » Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:00 pm

cl2117 wrote:
JediMasterRevan wrote:
return2glory wrote:Instead of showing signs of getting better, Romeo is looking more and more like a wasted pick.

He had managed to score 4 points in his last 3 games as a starter. 2 of those points was a lucky tip in.

Romeo, Nesmith, Grant and Semi are trash. It’s sad.

Pritchard is the only bright spot in the last few years of Danny’s picks.



Nesmith hasnt had enough of a chance to prove he is trash.


Romeo is just a role player 10-12 minutes a night guy
Grant is a 5-8 minutes guy

Semi shouldnt be in the nba

Romeo hasn't had enough of a chance either. He's only got about 10 games under his belt in his sophomore season. He's probably still only a role plyae at best, but don't see him as a right off yet.

Defensively he's been good. Offensively he's just not 3 &D, he's more Tony Allen cutting/slashing and D, but he's not playing with any true facilitators nor does he have a chance to play on ball. If we had pass first PG like CP3/Rondo/Rubio think he'd look better on that end of the floor since he moves well.

Nesmith is basically red-shirting. Grant and Semi are filler guys for lottery teams. They'll have more contracts in the NBA, but you won't hear their names ever.

Edwards/Waters are G-league.



If this team is healthy there is no way that romeo will get minutes much less have plays run to get him opportunities. Team moves ball well yet he gets nothing. Im not about making excuses for someone who has over 500 nba minutes amd has been gifted playing time non stop since returning.

He is way down the pecking order.

Tatum
Brown
Kemba
Smart
Fournier
Timelord
Pritchard


And honestly, nesmith will surpase as he is capable of scoring off kickoits
JediMasterRevan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,856
And1: 1,047
Joined: Nov 06, 2020

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#787 » by JediMasterRevan » Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:05 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:Celtics need more from Romeo Langford or he will be unplayable in the playoffs. Can’t have someone on the floor that the defense completely ignores. Romeo’s defense is not good enough to make up for his total zero on offense. Romeo has about 12 games to figure it out



Romeo shpuldnt be playing in the playoffs.

Tatum
Brown
Smart
Kemba
Fournier
Pritchard

He is not above any of those guys.

Timelord
Thompson
And as much as i hate it grant williams.

Thats 9 guys.

We arent playing a 10 man rotation in the playoffs.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#788 » by Bleeding Green » Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:09 pm

They'll definitely have a 10-11 man rotation because guaranteed at least 3 players will be injured each game.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
AgentGreen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,935
And1: 3,469
Joined: Feb 12, 2013
Location: Greentown
     

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#789 » by AgentGreen » Sat Apr 24, 2021 8:49 pm

Image
Image
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 17,079
And1: 18,549
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#790 » by playa-hater » Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:12 pm

If Romeo had a left wrist injury I would be calling him a bust. but it was his right wrist which means he couldn't even work on the thing he needed the most, and that was shooting. He still has young potential, but will need to work his shooting ass off this summer. Lonzo and Melo Ball had some funky worse mechanics. They improved it. I see no reason why Romeo couldn't either. A good jump shot and every other part of his game would open up.

If after the summer he doesn't show real progress, then move on.
SHOOTERS SHOOTER SHOOTERS
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 19,080
And1: 17,156
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#791 » by Hal14 » Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:19 pm

return2glory wrote:Instead of showing signs of getting better, Romeo is looking more and more like a wasted pick.

He had managed to score 4 points in his last 3 games as a starter. 2 of those points was a lucky tip in.

Romeo, Nesmith, Grant and Semi are trash. It’s sad.

Pritchard is the only bright spot in the last few years of Danny’s picks.

Such a stupid post. Time Lord (27th pick less than 3 years ago) is top 10 in the NBA in PER, FG%, TS%, BPM, offensive rating, defensive rating, rebounding % and blocks %.

What's sad is calling guys trash who are only 21 or 22 years old. Anyone with any basketball knowledge knows it typically takes at least 3 seasons before you can actually begin to draw any meaningful conclusions about whether a player is working out or now. Unless we want to give up on all of these guys and then have it come back to bite us in the a## like it did with Billups, Joe Johnson, Bruce Bowen, etc.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
JediMasterRevan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,856
And1: 1,047
Joined: Nov 06, 2020

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#792 » by JediMasterRevan » Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:19 pm

Bleeding Green wrote:They'll definitely have a 10-11 man rotation because guaranteed at least 3 players will be injured each game.



All I now is if romeo and grant williams get extended burn in the playoffs then we are a 2nd round sweep out.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 19,080
And1: 17,156
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#793 » by Hal14 » Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:20 pm

playa-hater wrote:If Romeo had a left wrist injury I would be calling him a bust. but it was his right wrist which means he couldn't even work on the thing he needed the most, and that was shooting. He still has young potential, but will need to work his shooting ass off this summer. Lonzo and Melo Ball had some funky worse mechanics. They improved it. I see no reason why Romeo couldn't either. A good jump shot and every other part of his game would open up.

If after the summer he doesn't show real progress, then move on.

Calling anyone a bust who's only 21, only played 1 year of college ball and less than 50 games of NBA ball is dumb. Surgery on his right wrist is the icing on the cake..
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
jpjp
Ballboy
Posts: 40
And1: 39
Joined: Nov 21, 2020

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#794 » by jpjp » Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:40 pm

I would not rule out or praise players until they have completed their rookie contract, i.e. played a minimum of 4-5 seasons.
poopship
Junior
Posts: 463
And1: 608
Joined: Jul 08, 2017
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
   

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#795 » by poopship » Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:55 am

Crazy notion but maybe he can improve if he gets to stay healthy for more than a couple of weeks. Work on his handle and finishing through contact and he may be a decent bench player even if he stays a bad outside shooter.
cloverleaf
General Manager
Posts: 9,134
And1: 6,377
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#796 » by cloverleaf » Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:08 am

JediMasterRevan wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Celtics need more from Romeo Langford or he will be unplayable in the playoffs. Can’t have someone on the floor that the defense completely ignores. Romeo’s defense is not good enough to make up for his total zero on offense. Romeo has about 12 games to figure it out



Romeo shpuldnt be playing in the playoffs.

Tatum
Brown
Smart
Kemba
Fournier
Pritchard

He is not above any of those guys.

Timelord
Thompson
And as much as i hate it grant williams.

Thats 9 guys.

We arent playing a 10 man rotation in the playoffs.


I'm hoping more Jabari than Grant by then, but at this point we've got to expect an average of a couple of players not being available for their play-in game (or more, if they win that).
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,958
And1: 8,694
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#797 » by ParticleMan » Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:45 am

^^ sure, but could we at least have it be like semi and kornet and carsen who are the guys not available, for a change? why does it always have to be our top rotation players? i beg you, basketball gods!
Krkrich
Senior
Posts: 535
And1: 419
Joined: Nov 07, 2013
     

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#798 » by Krkrich » Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:35 pm

the problem with romeo is that he barely gets any looks. His role is to stand in the corner to clear out space. I hate brads offense.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,473
And1: 9,696
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#799 » by return2glory » Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:44 pm

Hal14 wrote:
return2glory wrote:Instead of showing signs of getting better, Romeo is looking more and more like a wasted pick.

He had managed to score 4 points in his last 3 games as a starter. 2 of those points was a lucky tip in.

Romeo, Nesmith, Grant and Semi are trash. It’s sad.

Pritchard is the only bright spot in the last few years of Danny’s picks.

Such a stupid post. Time Lord (27th pick less than 3 years ago) is top 10 in the NBA in PER, FG%, TS%, BPM, offensive rating, defensive rating, rebounding % and blocks %.

What's sad is calling guys trash who are only 21 or 22 years old. Anyone with any basketball knowledge knows it typically takes at least 3 seasons before you can actually begin to draw any meaningful conclusions about whether a player is working out or now. Unless we want to give up on all of these guys and then have it come back to bite us in the a## like it did with Billups, Joe Johnson, Bruce Bowen, etc.


You know few could also mean as low as 2 right?

You must be a huge Romeo or Nesmith fan to get so upset.
Patsfan1081
RealGM
Posts: 11,991
And1: 5,491
Joined: Jan 06, 2015

Re: Romeo Langford Thread 

Post#800 » by Patsfan1081 » Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:53 pm

Hal14 wrote:
return2glory wrote:Instead of showing signs of getting better, Romeo is looking more and more like a wasted pick.

He had managed to score 4 points in his last 3 games as a starter. 2 of those points was a lucky tip in.

Romeo, Nesmith, Grant and Semi are trash. It’s sad.

Pritchard is the only bright spot in the last few years of Danny’s picks.

Such a stupid post. Time Lord (27th pick less than 3 years ago) is top 10 in the NBA in PER, FG%, TS%, BPM, offensive rating, defensive rating, rebounding % and blocks %.

What's sad is calling guys trash who are only 21 or 22 years old. Anyone with any basketball knowledge knows it typically takes at least 3 seasons before you can actually begin to draw any meaningful conclusions about whether a player is working out or now. Unless we want to give up on all of these guys and then have it come back to bite us in the a## like it did with Billups, Joe Johnson, Bruce Bowen, etc.


Those numbers are misleading when someone can’t stay on the floor. I agree with the premise of you’re argument also only Ainge used all of his picks instead of addressing his depth issue with veteran players, he’s relying on these picks to give meaningful contributions right away. It would be fine having one of the Nesmith/Langford/G Williams types to develope, but his whole bench is rookie contract guys giving you nothing. Anyway you spin it Ainge did a poor job with the roster.

Return to Boston Celtics