Andrew McCeltic wrote:This write-up surprised me:
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/celtics-midseason-report-card-kemba-walker-has-changed-everything-jayson-tatum-jaylen-brown-becoming-stars/ -
Kemba and Kyrie play similarly -- heavy pick-and-roll, a lot of individual, dribbling-display creation. Walker, in fact, is holding the ball for longer per touch this season (5.13 seconds, per NBA.com) than Kyrie did with Boston last season (4.27 seconds), while also dribbling more times per touch (4.71) than Kyrie did last season (3.91).
So the theory about Kyrie being too ball dominant for the other Celtics to feel involved doesn't necessarily hold water, at least not statistically. In fact, last year's Celtics, on average, made 16 more passes per game than this year's team does.
Is that description missing something? My own eye test would have said Kemba is less ball dominant.. but does he hold the ball in a "different" way than Kyrie did?
Dribbles/touch stats are among the more misleading stats publicly available. Does that take into account bringing down the ball full court? Kemba bringing the ball across half court more than Kyrie alone would skew his stats. Which he does quite often compared to Kyrie, who had Smart as his backcourt mate for most of last season.
Kemba iso frequency this season = 6.9%
Kyrie iso frequency last season = 13.2%
That's more indicative of their preferred style of play and fit within Stevens' offense.
Kemba's frequency in taking 7+ dribbles before a FGA is indeed higher than Kyrie's last season -- 35.3% vs. 26.2%.
But I think this is due to the fact that we've been running more PnR for Kemba compared to Kyrie last season -- 47.9% vs. 29.4%.
I don't know what the exact stats are concerning PnR vs iso. I do know that the former can create more efficient shots and I think it can set up more opportunities for your teammates.