Captain_Caveman wrote:Tyakack wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:
That's framing it exactly wrong. However flimsy and unenforced they have been, lockdowns and mask mandates have already saved hundreds of thousands of lives in the US, and will continue to save several hundreds thousands more by the end of this. They will also prevent hundreds of thousands of people from having long-term or permanently debilitating impacts.
It should never have been viewed as a choice between lockdowns and saving the economy. Not only would the economic impacts be far, far greater without them, the real conversation is why the richest country on Earth did not provide sufficient stimulus to their citizens and small businesses to help us ride this out.
There is nothing about what I said that is framing it wrong if you believe in what america is supposed to stand for. Which is NOT letting the government tell you if you are allowed to spend time with your family for the holidays or not or if you are allowed to keep your business open. You don't shut down the entire country over a virus. Especially one where you stand a 99% chance of surviving. That is not a sustainable or reasonable. The lockdown is also ruining the lives of many small business owners at the moment. Alot of them won't be able to recover after this..
Regardless of rather you feel lockdowns are the way to go, it is completely 100% anti american. Anti freedom. If people want to go out to a restaurant they should be able to go out to a restaurant. That is their right as an american citizen. Regardless how YOU or I feel about it. People know the risks. They should be allowed to make choices for themselves and not be forced by the government to stay in the house.
Well, this isn't the place to get political. Unlike the highly ideological and political statement that lockdowns infringe upon one's freedoms, I don't believe that I was getting political when pointing that these lockdowns during the height of a deadly global pandemic will save lives, and ultimately, benefit the national economy. Those are just statements of facts, tbh. We have case studies all over the world of places that handled this correctly (Japan, Germany, South Korea) vs ones that definitely did not (Sweden, the US).
I don't even think the notion of stimulus is really that political, especially given that George W Bush once gave out stimulus checks for literally no reason at all, to everyone, without means-testing.
I would just note here that we are fans of a team that plays in a city that was logging over a thousand dead people per day during the height of the 1918 pandemic. All four of my grandparents were born into families that were decimated by that virus. Both of my grandfathers were later subject to a mandatory draft, in which they were compelled to experience heavy combat in overseas wars with exactly no say in the matter. Did this infringe upon their individual freedoms, do you think?
Because if we are going to have a conversation about what is American or not, throughout our history, it is has been completely common to sacrifice individual freedoms during periods of national crisis in the name of the national interest. From food and supply rationing and military drafts during wartime to lockdowns and mask mandates during pandemics, it has always been part of being an American to act in the name of the greater good when called upon. Not a political take, just another statement of fact.
If acting in the name of individual freedoms is going to cost an additional 500k-1m lives, leave an additional hundreds of thousands debilitated, and do significant additional and needless damages to our economy, it is in no way somehow more "American".
In sum, no one has the "freedom" to kill other people's loved ones during a time of crisis, and that has nothing at all to do with being an American. That "right" was never granted to any of us at any point.